核酸扩增-侧流免疫法(NAA-LFIA)快速鉴别伊氏锥虫和装备锥虫。

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Veterinary journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106306
Didik T. Subekti , Sulinawati Fong , Dyah A. Kurniawati , Nur Jannah , Ichwan Yuniarto , Lucia T. Suwanti , Sunarno Sunarno , Mufasirin Mufasirin , Ali Rohman
{"title":"核酸扩增-侧流免疫法(NAA-LFIA)快速鉴别伊氏锥虫和装备锥虫。","authors":"Didik T. Subekti ,&nbsp;Sulinawati Fong ,&nbsp;Dyah A. Kurniawati ,&nbsp;Nur Jannah ,&nbsp;Ichwan Yuniarto ,&nbsp;Lucia T. Suwanti ,&nbsp;Sunarno Sunarno ,&nbsp;Mufasirin Mufasirin ,&nbsp;Ali Rohman","doi":"10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Trypanosoma evansi</em> and <em>Trypanosoma equiperdum</em> are very difficult to distinguish morphologically. However, molecular identification algorithms sequentially using Mini and Maxi primers can distinguish the two species. Duplex polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) facilitates simultaneous amplification but is difficult to visualize with gel electrophoresis because it produces overlapping amplicons. Meanwhile, recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) samples using two pairs of primers must be incubated separately due to differences in incubation temperature. This study aimed to evaluate the initial use of duplex lateral flow immunoassay (dLFIA) to distinguish <em>T. evansi</em> and <em>T. equiperdum</em>. The dPCR was performed by mixing two pairs of primers with the DNA template in one master mix tube, while for RPA, the Mini primer was incubated at 40 °C for 30 minutes and the Maxi at 42 °C for 60 minutes. The dPCR product was diluted and dropped onto the sample pad of dLFIA, while the RPA products were diluted and mixed before being dropped onto the sample pad. The results showed that dPCR had a limit of detection for nucleic acids of 10<sup>2</sup> trypanosomes/mL, while that of RPA was only 10<sup>3</sup> trypanosomes/mL. The highest agreement coefficient for trypanosome detection between dPCR-dLFIA and RPA-dLFIA was 0.875, while that for trypanosome identification and differentiation was 0.571. dLFIA revealed separate bands of the two amplicons from dPCR using Mini and Maxi primers, unlike agarose gel electrophoresis. Thus, dPCR-dLFIA successfully identified <em>T. evansi</em> and <em>T. equiperdum</em>. On the other hand, RPA-dLFIA needs further improvement to reduce species misidentification and increase its agreement with dPCR-dLFIA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23505,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary journal","volume":"310 ","pages":"Article 106306"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nucleic acid amplification–lateral flow immunoassay (NAA-LFIA) for the rapid differentiation of Trypanosoma evansi and Trypanosoma equiperdum\",\"authors\":\"Didik T. Subekti ,&nbsp;Sulinawati Fong ,&nbsp;Dyah A. Kurniawati ,&nbsp;Nur Jannah ,&nbsp;Ichwan Yuniarto ,&nbsp;Lucia T. Suwanti ,&nbsp;Sunarno Sunarno ,&nbsp;Mufasirin Mufasirin ,&nbsp;Ali Rohman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>Trypanosoma evansi</em> and <em>Trypanosoma equiperdum</em> are very difficult to distinguish morphologically. However, molecular identification algorithms sequentially using Mini and Maxi primers can distinguish the two species. Duplex polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) facilitates simultaneous amplification but is difficult to visualize with gel electrophoresis because it produces overlapping amplicons. Meanwhile, recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) samples using two pairs of primers must be incubated separately due to differences in incubation temperature. This study aimed to evaluate the initial use of duplex lateral flow immunoassay (dLFIA) to distinguish <em>T. evansi</em> and <em>T. equiperdum</em>. The dPCR was performed by mixing two pairs of primers with the DNA template in one master mix tube, while for RPA, the Mini primer was incubated at 40 °C for 30 minutes and the Maxi at 42 °C for 60 minutes. The dPCR product was diluted and dropped onto the sample pad of dLFIA, while the RPA products were diluted and mixed before being dropped onto the sample pad. The results showed that dPCR had a limit of detection for nucleic acids of 10<sup>2</sup> trypanosomes/mL, while that of RPA was only 10<sup>3</sup> trypanosomes/mL. The highest agreement coefficient for trypanosome detection between dPCR-dLFIA and RPA-dLFIA was 0.875, while that for trypanosome identification and differentiation was 0.571. dLFIA revealed separate bands of the two amplicons from dPCR using Mini and Maxi primers, unlike agarose gel electrophoresis. Thus, dPCR-dLFIA successfully identified <em>T. evansi</em> and <em>T. equiperdum</em>. On the other hand, RPA-dLFIA needs further improvement to reduce species misidentification and increase its agreement with dPCR-dLFIA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary journal\",\"volume\":\"310 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090023325000103\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090023325000103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伊氏锥虫和装备锥虫在形态学上很难区分。然而,依次使用Mini和Maxi引物的分子识别算法可以区分这两个物种。双聚合酶链反应(dPCR)有利于同时扩增,但由于其产生重叠扩增子,难以用凝胶电泳可视化。同时,使用两对引物的重组酶聚合酶扩增(recombinase polymerase amplification, RPA)样品由于孵育温度的差异,必须分开孵育。本研究旨在评价双侧流免疫分析法(dLFIA)在区分伊氏弓形虫和装备弓形虫中的初步应用。dPCR将两对引物与DNA模板在一个主混合管中混合,而RPA则将Mini引物在40°C下孵育30分钟,Maxi在42°C下孵育60分钟。将dPCR产物稀释后滴入dLFIA样品垫上,将RPA产物稀释混合后滴入样品垫上。结果表明,dPCR的核酸检出限为102个锥虫/mL,而RPA的检出限仅为103个锥虫/mL。dPCR-dLFIA与RPA-dLFIA对锥虫检测的最高一致系数为0.875,对锥虫鉴定与分化的最高一致系数为0.571。与琼脂糖凝胶电泳不同,dLFIA使用Mini和Maxi引物从dPCR中显示两个扩增子的独立条带。因此,dPCR-dLFIA成功鉴定了伊瓦氏T.和装备T.。另一方面,RPA-dLFIA还需要进一步改进,以减少物种误认,并增加其与dPCR-dLFIA的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nucleic acid amplification–lateral flow immunoassay (NAA-LFIA) for the rapid differentiation of Trypanosoma evansi and Trypanosoma equiperdum
Trypanosoma evansi and Trypanosoma equiperdum are very difficult to distinguish morphologically. However, molecular identification algorithms sequentially using Mini and Maxi primers can distinguish the two species. Duplex polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) facilitates simultaneous amplification but is difficult to visualize with gel electrophoresis because it produces overlapping amplicons. Meanwhile, recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) samples using two pairs of primers must be incubated separately due to differences in incubation temperature. This study aimed to evaluate the initial use of duplex lateral flow immunoassay (dLFIA) to distinguish T. evansi and T. equiperdum. The dPCR was performed by mixing two pairs of primers with the DNA template in one master mix tube, while for RPA, the Mini primer was incubated at 40 °C for 30 minutes and the Maxi at 42 °C for 60 minutes. The dPCR product was diluted and dropped onto the sample pad of dLFIA, while the RPA products were diluted and mixed before being dropped onto the sample pad. The results showed that dPCR had a limit of detection for nucleic acids of 102 trypanosomes/mL, while that of RPA was only 103 trypanosomes/mL. The highest agreement coefficient for trypanosome detection between dPCR-dLFIA and RPA-dLFIA was 0.875, while that for trypanosome identification and differentiation was 0.571. dLFIA revealed separate bands of the two amplicons from dPCR using Mini and Maxi primers, unlike agarose gel electrophoresis. Thus, dPCR-dLFIA successfully identified T. evansi and T. equiperdum. On the other hand, RPA-dLFIA needs further improvement to reduce species misidentification and increase its agreement with dPCR-dLFIA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary journal
Veterinary journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
79
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The Veterinary Journal (established 1875) publishes worldwide contributions on all aspects of veterinary science and its related subjects. It provides regular book reviews and a short communications section. The journal regularly commissions topical reviews and commentaries on features of major importance. Research areas include infectious diseases, applied biochemistry, parasitology, endocrinology, microbiology, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, molecular biology, immunogenetics, surgery, ophthalmology, dermatology and oncology.
期刊最新文献
In vivo transcriptomic profiling of colonic mucosa during Brachyspira hyodysenteriae infection in pigs Oral interferon alpha treatment significantly reduces halitosis and Porphyromonas gulae growth in dogs with periodontal disease Feline panleukopenia: Analysis of possible survival biomarkers Evaluation of large language models for clinical sign-based oral assessment in dogs compared with veterinary practitioners Detection, isolation and molecular characterization of Senecavirus A in porcine semen: Implications for control programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1