生物质和煤共烧气化与燃烧前碳捕获:混合原料对使用物理溶剂吸收二氧化碳的影响

IF 5.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104300
Kathryn H. Smith , Joshua J. Stanislowski , Michael L. Swanson , Nicholas S. Siefert
{"title":"生物质和煤共烧气化与燃烧前碳捕获:混合原料对使用物理溶剂吸收二氧化碳的影响","authors":"Kathryn H. Smith ,&nbsp;Joshua J. Stanislowski ,&nbsp;Michael L. Swanson ,&nbsp;Nicholas S. Siefert","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advances in co-gasification of coal and biomass are resulting in more interest in poly-generation facilities that can produce hydrogen rich syngas for producing chemicals, fuels and energy, with much lower carbon emissions. When biomass is blended with hydrocarbon feedstocks like coal (biomass cofiring) and when the carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) produced during the gasification process is captured using pre-combustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture technologies, it is possible to emit less CO<sub>2</sub> into the atmosphere than it took to grow the biomass material, resulting in net negative or low CO<sub>2</sub> emissions.</div><div>Here, we present the first carbon capture pilot plant data for CO<sub>2</sub> removal from coal and biomass derived syngas using physical solvent absorption. The physical solvent (DEPG at 35.0 L·<em>h</em><sup>−1</sup> and 10.5 °C) was tested in a packed absorption column under pre-combustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture conditions using the biomass derived syngas mixtures (3.54 MPa at 3.4 std. m<sup>3</sup>·<em>h</em><sup>−1</sup> and 53.1 °C) to assess any changes in the absorption process resulting from co-gasification. Overall, the CO<sub>2</sub> absorption performance of the solvent did not appear to be impacted by the varying feedstock compositions as indicated by average CO<sub>2</sub> removal efficiency of 97.3 % with a standard deviation of 1.6 % across all trials. Despite minor accumulation of organic gas species in the solvent and gas streams exiting the absorber, there did not appear to be any strong correlations between CO<sub>2</sub> capture performance and coal type or biomass type or mixture concentration. These results indicate traditional physical solvent absorption processes can be used with minimal impact from novel gasification feedstock mixtures including coal, wood and corn stover mixtures, but longer term testing is recommended to fully assess the impact of accumulating inorganic and organic species from biomass feedstock.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 104300"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomass and coal cofiring gasification with pre-combustion carbon capture: Impact of mixed feedstocks on CO2 absorption using a physical solvent\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn H. Smith ,&nbsp;Joshua J. Stanislowski ,&nbsp;Michael L. Swanson ,&nbsp;Nicholas S. Siefert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Advances in co-gasification of coal and biomass are resulting in more interest in poly-generation facilities that can produce hydrogen rich syngas for producing chemicals, fuels and energy, with much lower carbon emissions. When biomass is blended with hydrocarbon feedstocks like coal (biomass cofiring) and when the carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) produced during the gasification process is captured using pre-combustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture technologies, it is possible to emit less CO<sub>2</sub> into the atmosphere than it took to grow the biomass material, resulting in net negative or low CO<sub>2</sub> emissions.</div><div>Here, we present the first carbon capture pilot plant data for CO<sub>2</sub> removal from coal and biomass derived syngas using physical solvent absorption. The physical solvent (DEPG at 35.0 L·<em>h</em><sup>−1</sup> and 10.5 °C) was tested in a packed absorption column under pre-combustion CO<sub>2</sub> capture conditions using the biomass derived syngas mixtures (3.54 MPa at 3.4 std. m<sup>3</sup>·<em>h</em><sup>−1</sup> and 53.1 °C) to assess any changes in the absorption process resulting from co-gasification. Overall, the CO<sub>2</sub> absorption performance of the solvent did not appear to be impacted by the varying feedstock compositions as indicated by average CO<sub>2</sub> removal efficiency of 97.3 % with a standard deviation of 1.6 % across all trials. Despite minor accumulation of organic gas species in the solvent and gas streams exiting the absorber, there did not appear to be any strong correlations between CO<sub>2</sub> capture performance and coal type or biomass type or mixture concentration. These results indicate traditional physical solvent absorption processes can be used with minimal impact from novel gasification feedstock mixtures including coal, wood and corn stover mixtures, but longer term testing is recommended to fully assess the impact of accumulating inorganic and organic species from biomass feedstock.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624002433\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624002433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

煤和生物质共气化技术的进步使人们对多联产设施产生了更大的兴趣,这种多联产设施可以生产富氢合成气,用于生产化学品、燃料和能源,碳排放要低得多。当生物质与煤等碳氢化合物原料混合(生物质共燃),并使用燃烧前二氧化碳捕获技术捕获气化过程中产生的二氧化碳(CO2)时,向大气中排放的二氧化碳可能少于生长生物质材料所需的二氧化碳,从而导致净负或低二氧化碳排放。在这里,我们提出了第一个碳捕获中试工厂数据,用于利用物理溶剂吸收从煤和生物质衍生合成气中去除二氧化碳。在燃烧前CO2捕获条件下,利用生物质衍生合成气混合物(3.54 MPa, 3.4 std. m3·h−1,53.1°C)在填充吸收柱中测试物理溶剂(DEPG在35.0 L·h−1和10.5°C下),以评估共气化引起的吸收过程的任何变化。总的来说,溶剂的CO2吸收性能似乎没有受到不同原料组成的影响,所有试验的平均CO2去除率为97.3%,标准差为1.6%。尽管在溶剂和流出吸收器的气流中有少量的有机气体积累,但CO2捕获性能与煤类型或生物质类型或混合物浓度之间似乎没有任何强相关性。这些结果表明,使用传统的物理溶剂吸收工艺可以对新型气化原料混合物(包括煤、木材和玉米秸秆混合物)产生最小的影响,但建议进行更长期的测试,以充分评估生物质原料中积累的无机和有机物种的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biomass and coal cofiring gasification with pre-combustion carbon capture: Impact of mixed feedstocks on CO2 absorption using a physical solvent
Advances in co-gasification of coal and biomass are resulting in more interest in poly-generation facilities that can produce hydrogen rich syngas for producing chemicals, fuels and energy, with much lower carbon emissions. When biomass is blended with hydrocarbon feedstocks like coal (biomass cofiring) and when the carbon dioxide (CO2) produced during the gasification process is captured using pre-combustion CO2 capture technologies, it is possible to emit less CO2 into the atmosphere than it took to grow the biomass material, resulting in net negative or low CO2 emissions.
Here, we present the first carbon capture pilot plant data for CO2 removal from coal and biomass derived syngas using physical solvent absorption. The physical solvent (DEPG at 35.0 L·h−1 and 10.5 °C) was tested in a packed absorption column under pre-combustion CO2 capture conditions using the biomass derived syngas mixtures (3.54 MPa at 3.4 std. m3·h−1 and 53.1 °C) to assess any changes in the absorption process resulting from co-gasification. Overall, the CO2 absorption performance of the solvent did not appear to be impacted by the varying feedstock compositions as indicated by average CO2 removal efficiency of 97.3 % with a standard deviation of 1.6 % across all trials. Despite minor accumulation of organic gas species in the solvent and gas streams exiting the absorber, there did not appear to be any strong correlations between CO2 capture performance and coal type or biomass type or mixture concentration. These results indicate traditional physical solvent absorption processes can be used with minimal impact from novel gasification feedstock mixtures including coal, wood and corn stover mixtures, but longer term testing is recommended to fully assess the impact of accumulating inorganic and organic species from biomass feedstock.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
期刊最新文献
CESAR1 solvent degradation in pilot and laboratory scale Editorial Board Reassessing historical gas occurrences considering CO2 geological storage, a case study of the Cuiabá Paulista occurrence, Brazil Steady-state simulation of large-scale pipeline networks for CCUS applications Geochemical framework for CO2 mineralization in coastal aquifers: Lessons from the Coda Terminal project, Iceland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1