去增长的能源社区:民主、减少、维持和替代

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103946
Daniel Petrovics , Federico Savini
{"title":"去增长的能源社区:民主、减少、维持和替代","authors":"Daniel Petrovics ,&nbsp;Federico Savini","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper proposes a conceptual framework for degrowth research on energy communities, organizations which rely on the principles of voluntary membership, democratic control of renewable energy sources and relative autonomy from market forces. Prevailing sentiments suggest that energy communities' cooperative and democratic structure may offer a path towards goals set out by degrowth scholars, such as a reduction in energy throughput. However, no framework exists from which to assess if and how this occurs in practice. Therefore, we identify four dimensions that affect the degrowth potential of energy communities: democratization, reduction, maintenance and substitution. We develop each of these dimensions and propose that energy communities may drive a reduction in energy throughput if they (a) foster democratic decision-making, (b) explicitly seek to reduce their members' energy consumption, (c) maintain their democratic structure and physical infrastructure over the long term and (d) actively promote substituting existing fossil-based energy with renewable sources. Based on these dimensions, we identify six key avenues for research on energy communities and degrowth. We suggest that degrowth energy research should continue analysing the tensions and links between these dimensions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103946"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy communities for degrowth: Democracy, reduction, maintenance and substitution\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Petrovics ,&nbsp;Federico Savini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper proposes a conceptual framework for degrowth research on energy communities, organizations which rely on the principles of voluntary membership, democratic control of renewable energy sources and relative autonomy from market forces. Prevailing sentiments suggest that energy communities' cooperative and democratic structure may offer a path towards goals set out by degrowth scholars, such as a reduction in energy throughput. However, no framework exists from which to assess if and how this occurs in practice. Therefore, we identify four dimensions that affect the degrowth potential of energy communities: democratization, reduction, maintenance and substitution. We develop each of these dimensions and propose that energy communities may drive a reduction in energy throughput if they (a) foster democratic decision-making, (b) explicitly seek to reduce their members' energy consumption, (c) maintain their democratic structure and physical infrastructure over the long term and (d) actively promote substituting existing fossil-based energy with renewable sources. Based on these dimensions, we identify six key avenues for research on energy communities and degrowth. We suggest that degrowth energy research should continue analysing the tensions and links between these dimensions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"121 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000271\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000271","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一个关于能源社区的去生长研究的概念框架,这些组织依赖于自愿成员原则,对可再生能源的民主控制和相对于市场力量的自治。普遍的观点认为,能源社区的合作和民主结构可能为实现去增长学者设定的目标提供了一条途径,比如减少能源产量。然而,没有一个框架可以用来评估这种情况是否以及如何在实践中发生。因此,我们确定了影响能源社区去增长潜力的四个维度:民主化、减少、维持和替代。我们发展了这些维度,并提出能源社区可以推动能源吞吐量的减少,如果他们(a)促进民主决策,(b)明确寻求减少其成员的能源消耗,(c)长期维持其民主结构和物理基础设施,(d)积极促进用可再生能源替代现有的化石能源。基于这些维度,我们确定了能源群落和去生长研究的六个关键途径。我们建议去生长能量研究应该继续分析这些维度之间的紧张关系和联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Energy communities for degrowth: Democracy, reduction, maintenance and substitution
This paper proposes a conceptual framework for degrowth research on energy communities, organizations which rely on the principles of voluntary membership, democratic control of renewable energy sources and relative autonomy from market forces. Prevailing sentiments suggest that energy communities' cooperative and democratic structure may offer a path towards goals set out by degrowth scholars, such as a reduction in energy throughput. However, no framework exists from which to assess if and how this occurs in practice. Therefore, we identify four dimensions that affect the degrowth potential of energy communities: democratization, reduction, maintenance and substitution. We develop each of these dimensions and propose that energy communities may drive a reduction in energy throughput if they (a) foster democratic decision-making, (b) explicitly seek to reduce their members' energy consumption, (c) maintain their democratic structure and physical infrastructure over the long term and (d) actively promote substituting existing fossil-based energy with renewable sources. Based on these dimensions, we identify six key avenues for research on energy communities and degrowth. We suggest that degrowth energy research should continue analysing the tensions and links between these dimensions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Addressing “the ones behind”: Public responses to technologies and the role of responsibility Private sector agency in low-carbon transitions: Rethinking energy security through hybrid governance in the Global South Infrastructure failures and aging populations: Quantifying the spatial overlap of power outages and older adult vulnerability The efficiency divide: Housing constraints on energy-saving practices in Darwin, Australia From anti-reflexive politicization to anti-reflexive policies: The emergence of renewable exclusion zones in United States environmental policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1