基于模型平均法的碳排放市场波动估计与预测

IF 5.5 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Modelling Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106976
Nianling Wang , Qianchao Wang , Yong Li
{"title":"基于模型平均法的碳排放市场波动估计与预测","authors":"Nianling Wang ,&nbsp;Qianchao Wang ,&nbsp;Yong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding volatility is essential for risk management and green investment decision-making in the carbon market. However, existing studies lack a unified framework for modeling and estimating carbon market volatility, and predictions are often affected by model uncertainty. Using data from EU emission allowances, we estimate parameters for multiple GARCH models via the Sequential Monte Carlo method and improve forecasting accuracy with model averaging techniques. Our results reveal that carbon market volatility is characterized by spikes, thick tails, asymmetry, and jumps. Based on Model Confidence Set test, model comparison demonstrates that averaged models consistently outperform individual models across various loss criteria. By integrating information from multiple models, the model averaging approach simplifies model selection and plays a pivotal role in supporting volatility timing strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48419,"journal":{"name":"Economic Modelling","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 106976"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation and forecast of carbon emission market volatility based on model averaging method\",\"authors\":\"Nianling Wang ,&nbsp;Qianchao Wang ,&nbsp;Yong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding volatility is essential for risk management and green investment decision-making in the carbon market. However, existing studies lack a unified framework for modeling and estimating carbon market volatility, and predictions are often affected by model uncertainty. Using data from EU emission allowances, we estimate parameters for multiple GARCH models via the Sequential Monte Carlo method and improve forecasting accuracy with model averaging techniques. Our results reveal that carbon market volatility is characterized by spikes, thick tails, asymmetry, and jumps. Based on Model Confidence Set test, model comparison demonstrates that averaged models consistently outperform individual models across various loss criteria. By integrating information from multiple models, the model averaging approach simplifies model selection and plays a pivotal role in supporting volatility timing strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Modelling\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106976\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026499932400333X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026499932400333X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解波动性对于碳市场的风险管理和绿色投资决策至关重要。然而,现有的研究缺乏一个统一的框架来模拟和估计碳市场波动,而且预测往往受到模型不确定性的影响。利用欧盟排放配额数据,我们通过序贯蒙特卡罗方法估计了多个GARCH模型的参数,并利用模型平均技术提高了预测精度。研究结果表明,碳市场波动具有峰值、厚尾、不对称性和跳跃特征。基于模型置信集检验,模型比较表明平均模型在各种损失标准下始终优于单个模型。模型平均方法通过集成多个模型的信息,简化了模型选择,在支持波动率择时策略方面发挥了关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation and forecast of carbon emission market volatility based on model averaging method
Understanding volatility is essential for risk management and green investment decision-making in the carbon market. However, existing studies lack a unified framework for modeling and estimating carbon market volatility, and predictions are often affected by model uncertainty. Using data from EU emission allowances, we estimate parameters for multiple GARCH models via the Sequential Monte Carlo method and improve forecasting accuracy with model averaging techniques. Our results reveal that carbon market volatility is characterized by spikes, thick tails, asymmetry, and jumps. Based on Model Confidence Set test, model comparison demonstrates that averaged models consistently outperform individual models across various loss criteria. By integrating information from multiple models, the model averaging approach simplifies model selection and plays a pivotal role in supporting volatility timing strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Modelling
Economic Modelling ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.60%
发文量
295
期刊介绍: Economic Modelling fills a major gap in the economics literature, providing a single source of both theoretical and applied papers on economic modelling. The journal prime objective is to provide an international review of the state-of-the-art in economic modelling. Economic Modelling publishes the complete versions of many large-scale models of industrially advanced economies which have been developed for policy analysis. Examples are the Bank of England Model and the US Federal Reserve Board Model which had hitherto been unpublished. As individual models are revised and updated, the journal publishes subsequent papers dealing with these revisions, so keeping its readers as up to date as possible.
期刊最新文献
Green development dividend or digital divide? Evidence on the uneven development of China's digital economy Is the energy transition impacting the Eurozone sovereign credit risk? Evidence from Machine Learning How natural disasters affect insurance decisions Production and portfolio choice under jump–diffusion productivity shocks Tail risk connectedness and systemic volatility in the cryptocurrency market: Evidence from a value-at-risk framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1