反垄断法、市场竞争与企业绿色创新

IF 5.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Economics & Finance Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.iref.2024.103768
Baowei Ma , Huiwen Li
{"title":"反垄断法、市场竞争与企业绿色创新","authors":"Baowei Ma ,&nbsp;Huiwen Li","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2024.103768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Utilizing a dataset from 2003 to 2016 encompassing Chinese firms listed on the A-share market, the current study conducts a robust analysis through a quasi-experimental approach, focusing on the enforcement of the Anti-Monopoly Law in 2008. By employing the Difference-in-Differences (DID) technique, it delves into the profound connections between anti-monopoly laws, market competition, and corporate green innovation. The rigorous enforcement of anti-monopoly laws has inhibited green innovation in enterprises with stronger original monopoly power, reducing the green innovation performance gap between them and enterprises with weaker monopoly power. Moreover, the study reveals that anti-monopoly regulations bolster the occurrence of green innovation by intensifying market competition, driving companies to pursue distinct competitive edges. The analysis further suggests that the negative impact of anti-monopoly laws on eco-innovation is more significant in state-controlled enterprises and in sectors with pronounced monopolistic traits that are not technology-intensive. This scholarly work not only contributes to the academic discourse on the nexus between anti-monopoly legislation and corporate inventive endeavors but also equips policymakers with tangible insights into leveraging legal frameworks to foster environmentally sustainable corporate innovation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 103768"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antitrust laws, market competition and corporate green innovation\",\"authors\":\"Baowei Ma ,&nbsp;Huiwen Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iref.2024.103768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Utilizing a dataset from 2003 to 2016 encompassing Chinese firms listed on the A-share market, the current study conducts a robust analysis through a quasi-experimental approach, focusing on the enforcement of the Anti-Monopoly Law in 2008. By employing the Difference-in-Differences (DID) technique, it delves into the profound connections between anti-monopoly laws, market competition, and corporate green innovation. The rigorous enforcement of anti-monopoly laws has inhibited green innovation in enterprises with stronger original monopoly power, reducing the green innovation performance gap between them and enterprises with weaker monopoly power. Moreover, the study reveals that anti-monopoly regulations bolster the occurrence of green innovation by intensifying market competition, driving companies to pursue distinct competitive edges. The analysis further suggests that the negative impact of anti-monopoly laws on eco-innovation is more significant in state-controlled enterprises and in sectors with pronounced monopolistic traits that are not technology-intensive. This scholarly work not only contributes to the academic discourse on the nexus between anti-monopoly legislation and corporate inventive endeavors but also equips policymakers with tangible insights into leveraging legal frameworks to foster environmentally sustainable corporate innovation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103768\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024007603\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024007603","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用2003年至2016年在a股市场上市的中国公司的数据集,通过准实验方法进行了稳健分析,重点关注2008年《反垄断法》的执行情况。运用差异中的差异(DID)方法,深入探讨了反垄断法、市场竞争与企业绿色创新之间的深刻联系。反垄断法的严格执行抑制了原垄断力较强企业的绿色创新,缩小了原垄断力较弱企业与原垄断力较弱企业之间的绿色创新绩效差距。此外,研究发现,反垄断法规通过加剧市场竞争,推动企业追求独特的竞争优势,从而促进了绿色创新的发生。分析进一步表明,反垄断法对生态创新的负面影响在国有控股企业和具有明显垄断特征的非技术密集型行业更为显著。这项学术工作不仅有助于反垄断立法与企业创新努力之间关系的学术论述,而且还为政策制定者提供了利用法律框架促进环境可持续企业创新的切实见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antitrust laws, market competition and corporate green innovation
Utilizing a dataset from 2003 to 2016 encompassing Chinese firms listed on the A-share market, the current study conducts a robust analysis through a quasi-experimental approach, focusing on the enforcement of the Anti-Monopoly Law in 2008. By employing the Difference-in-Differences (DID) technique, it delves into the profound connections between anti-monopoly laws, market competition, and corporate green innovation. The rigorous enforcement of anti-monopoly laws has inhibited green innovation in enterprises with stronger original monopoly power, reducing the green innovation performance gap between them and enterprises with weaker monopoly power. Moreover, the study reveals that anti-monopoly regulations bolster the occurrence of green innovation by intensifying market competition, driving companies to pursue distinct competitive edges. The analysis further suggests that the negative impact of anti-monopoly laws on eco-innovation is more significant in state-controlled enterprises and in sectors with pronounced monopolistic traits that are not technology-intensive. This scholarly work not only contributes to the academic discourse on the nexus between anti-monopoly legislation and corporate inventive endeavors but also equips policymakers with tangible insights into leveraging legal frameworks to foster environmentally sustainable corporate innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
期刊最新文献
Climate policy uncertainty exposure and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China Venture capital, investor patience, and corporate innovation: Evidence from China The impact of BRICS de-dollarization on exchange rate fluctuations FinTech capability and systemic risk in banking The impact of artificial intelligence and group effects on supply chain resilience in enterprises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1