经直肠超声引导前列腺活检后感染并发症的预防:聚维酮碘、氯己定和福尔马林消毒的比较

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY World Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1007/s00345-025-05498-4
Mert Başaranoğlu, Ali Nebioğlu, Murat Bozlu, Ali Gökçe, Erdem Akbay
{"title":"经直肠超声引导前列腺活检后感染并发症的预防:聚维酮碘、氯己定和福尔马林消毒的比较","authors":"Mert Başaranoğlu, Ali Nebioğlu, Murat Bozlu, Ali Gökçe, Erdem Akbay","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05498-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to compare the efficacy of three different antiseptic methods to determine the most effective prophylactic approach to prevent infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB). The methods evaluated were transrectal povidone-iodine injection (TRPI), biopsy needle disinfection with chlorhexidine, and biopsy needle disinfection with formalin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2018 and January 2023, 904 patients who underwent TRUS-PB were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had prophylactic antibiotic use and negative urine/rectal culture results. Patients were divided into three groups according to the antiseptic protocol: Group 1 (n = 245) received only TRPI injection into the rectum before biopsy, Group 2 (n = 295) received only chlorhexidine needle disinfection before biopsy, and Group 3 (n = 364) received only formalin needle disinfection before biopsy. The biopsy needles used in our clinic are not single-use and are used on other patients after sterilization. The primary endpoint was the incidence of infectious complications within 30 days post-procedure. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, while categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test, and post-hoc analysis was applied for pairwise comparisons between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with postoperative infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall infection rate was 20.4%. Infection rates were 4.5% in the TRPI group, 16.6% in the chlorhexidine group, and 34.1% in the formalin group (p < 0.001). The TRPI group showed significantly lower rates of all infectious complications compared to other groups. Disinfection of biopsy needles with chlorhexidine was found to be significantly more effective in preventing infectious complications compared to disinfection with formalin (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TRPI injection before TRUS-PB appears to be more effective in preventing post-biopsy infectious complications compared to needle disinfection with chlorhexidine or formalin. This method may be considered as a preferred antiseptic approach for TRUS-PB procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevention of infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: comparison of povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, and formalin disinfection.\",\"authors\":\"Mert Başaranoğlu, Ali Nebioğlu, Murat Bozlu, Ali Gökçe, Erdem Akbay\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00345-025-05498-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to compare the efficacy of three different antiseptic methods to determine the most effective prophylactic approach to prevent infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB). The methods evaluated were transrectal povidone-iodine injection (TRPI), biopsy needle disinfection with chlorhexidine, and biopsy needle disinfection with formalin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2018 and January 2023, 904 patients who underwent TRUS-PB were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had prophylactic antibiotic use and negative urine/rectal culture results. Patients were divided into three groups according to the antiseptic protocol: Group 1 (n = 245) received only TRPI injection into the rectum before biopsy, Group 2 (n = 295) received only chlorhexidine needle disinfection before biopsy, and Group 3 (n = 364) received only formalin needle disinfection before biopsy. The biopsy needles used in our clinic are not single-use and are used on other patients after sterilization. The primary endpoint was the incidence of infectious complications within 30 days post-procedure. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, while categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test, and post-hoc analysis was applied for pairwise comparisons between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with postoperative infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall infection rate was 20.4%. Infection rates were 4.5% in the TRPI group, 16.6% in the chlorhexidine group, and 34.1% in the formalin group (p < 0.001). The TRPI group showed significantly lower rates of all infectious complications compared to other groups. Disinfection of biopsy needles with chlorhexidine was found to be significantly more effective in preventing infectious complications compared to disinfection with formalin (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TRPI injection before TRUS-PB appears to be more effective in preventing post-biopsy infectious complications compared to needle disinfection with chlorhexidine or formalin. This method may be considered as a preferred antiseptic approach for TRUS-PB procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805847/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05498-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05498-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较三种不同的消毒方法的效果,以确定经直肠超声引导前列腺活检(TRUS-PB)后最有效的预防感染并发症的方法。评估的方法有经直肠注射聚维酮碘(TRPI)、氯己定消毒活检针和福尔马林消毒活检针。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2023年1月期间904例接受TRUS-PB治疗的患者。所有患者均预防性使用抗生素,尿/直肠培养结果阴性。根据消毒方案将患者分为三组:1组(245例)活检前仅直肠内注射TRPI, 2组(295例)活检前仅洗必定针消毒,3组(364例)活检前仅福尔马林针消毒。我们诊所使用的活检针不是一次性使用的,而是在消毒后用于其他患者。主要终点是术后30天内感染并发症的发生率。连续变量分析采用Mann-Whitney U检验,分类变量分析采用卡方检验,组间两两比较采用事后分析。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析评价与术后感染相关的因素。结果:总感染率为20.4%。TRPI组感染率为4.5%,氯己定组为16.6%,福尔马林组为34.1%。(p)结论:与氯己定或福尔马林针头消毒相比,TRPI注射在TRUS-PB之前更有效地预防活检后感染并发症。这种方法可能被认为是TRUS-PB程序的首选防腐方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevention of infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: comparison of povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, and formalin disinfection.

Purpose: We aimed to compare the efficacy of three different antiseptic methods to determine the most effective prophylactic approach to prevent infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB). The methods evaluated were transrectal povidone-iodine injection (TRPI), biopsy needle disinfection with chlorhexidine, and biopsy needle disinfection with formalin.

Methods: Between January 2018 and January 2023, 904 patients who underwent TRUS-PB were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had prophylactic antibiotic use and negative urine/rectal culture results. Patients were divided into three groups according to the antiseptic protocol: Group 1 (n = 245) received only TRPI injection into the rectum before biopsy, Group 2 (n = 295) received only chlorhexidine needle disinfection before biopsy, and Group 3 (n = 364) received only formalin needle disinfection before biopsy. The biopsy needles used in our clinic are not single-use and are used on other patients after sterilization. The primary endpoint was the incidence of infectious complications within 30 days post-procedure. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, while categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test, and post-hoc analysis was applied for pairwise comparisons between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with postoperative infection.

Results: The overall infection rate was 20.4%. Infection rates were 4.5% in the TRPI group, 16.6% in the chlorhexidine group, and 34.1% in the formalin group (p < 0.001). The TRPI group showed significantly lower rates of all infectious complications compared to other groups. Disinfection of biopsy needles with chlorhexidine was found to be significantly more effective in preventing infectious complications compared to disinfection with formalin (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: TRPI injection before TRUS-PB appears to be more effective in preventing post-biopsy infectious complications compared to needle disinfection with chlorhexidine or formalin. This method may be considered as a preferred antiseptic approach for TRUS-PB procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
期刊最新文献
Protocol-driven botulinum toxin injections for pediatric neurogenic bladder: long-term continence and bladder outcomes supporting its role as a minimally invasive alternative to augmentation cystoplasty. Escherichia coli promotes myofibroblast differentiation in urethral fibrosis urethral stricture in vivo and vitro via regulating TGFβ/Smad signaling pathway. Comparison of TFL and high-power Ho: YAG lasers with multiple pulse modulations: an in vitro study. The future of endourology is now. Single-port robotic radical prostatectomy: early results from a UK centre.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1