预测不同妊娠阶段胎儿巨大儿的机器学习方法:中国的一项回顾性研究。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07239-2
Qingyuan Liu, Simin Zhu, Meng Zhao, Lan Ma, Chenqian Wang, Xiaotong Sun, Yanyan Feng, Yifan Wu, Zhen Zeng, Lei Zhang
{"title":"预测不同妊娠阶段胎儿巨大儿的机器学习方法:中国的一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Qingyuan Liu, Simin Zhu, Meng Zhao, Lan Ma, Chenqian Wang, Xiaotong Sun, Yanyan Feng, Yifan Wu, Zhen Zeng, Lei Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07239-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Macrosomia presents significant risks to both maternal and neonatal health, however, accurate antenatal prediction remains a major challenge. This study aimed to develop machine learning approaches to enhance the prediction of fetal macrosomia at different stages of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 500 pregnant women who delivered singleton infants at Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital between December 2019 and July 2024. The training set comprised 208 cases of macrosomia and 208 non-macrosomia cases, with 84 additional cases used for external validation. A total of 23 candidate variables, including maternal characteristics, physical measurements, and laboratory tests were collected for feature selection. Seven algorithms were applied in combination with three sets of selected features, resulting in 21 fitted models. Model performance was evaluated via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maternal height, pre-pregnancy weight, first-trimester weight, pre-labor weight, gestational age at birth, gestational weight gain, and the proportion of male neonates were significantly greater in the macrosomia group compared to non-macrosomia group in the training set (p < 0.05). The top five predictors for macrosomia were pre-labor weight, gestational weight gain, the Pre-labor Hb/First-trimester Hb ratio, first-trimester Hb, and maternal height. Logistic regression yielded the highest AUC values in the pre-pregnancy (0.790) and first-trimester (0.815) periods in the validation set, whereas the ensemble model achieved the highest AUC value of 0.930 before labor. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis highlighted pre-labor weight, gestational age, gestational weight gain, first-trimester Hb, and neonatal sex as important factors for the prediction of macrosomia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to utilize machine learning with data from the pre-pregnancy, first-trimester, and pre-labor periods to predict macrosomia. The logistic regression model and the final ensemble model demonstrated strong predictive performance, offering valuable insights to improve pre-pregnancy counseling, antenatal assessment, and intrapartum decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning approaches for predicting fetal macrosomia at different stages of pregnancy: a retrospective study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Qingyuan Liu, Simin Zhu, Meng Zhao, Lan Ma, Chenqian Wang, Xiaotong Sun, Yanyan Feng, Yifan Wu, Zhen Zeng, Lei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-025-07239-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Macrosomia presents significant risks to both maternal and neonatal health, however, accurate antenatal prediction remains a major challenge. This study aimed to develop machine learning approaches to enhance the prediction of fetal macrosomia at different stages of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 500 pregnant women who delivered singleton infants at Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital between December 2019 and July 2024. The training set comprised 208 cases of macrosomia and 208 non-macrosomia cases, with 84 additional cases used for external validation. A total of 23 candidate variables, including maternal characteristics, physical measurements, and laboratory tests were collected for feature selection. Seven algorithms were applied in combination with three sets of selected features, resulting in 21 fitted models. Model performance was evaluated via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maternal height, pre-pregnancy weight, first-trimester weight, pre-labor weight, gestational age at birth, gestational weight gain, and the proportion of male neonates were significantly greater in the macrosomia group compared to non-macrosomia group in the training set (p < 0.05). The top five predictors for macrosomia were pre-labor weight, gestational weight gain, the Pre-labor Hb/First-trimester Hb ratio, first-trimester Hb, and maternal height. Logistic regression yielded the highest AUC values in the pre-pregnancy (0.790) and first-trimester (0.815) periods in the validation set, whereas the ensemble model achieved the highest AUC value of 0.930 before labor. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis highlighted pre-labor weight, gestational age, gestational weight gain, first-trimester Hb, and neonatal sex as important factors for the prediction of macrosomia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to utilize machine learning with data from the pre-pregnancy, first-trimester, and pre-labor periods to predict macrosomia. The logistic regression model and the final ensemble model demonstrated strong predictive performance, offering valuable insights to improve pre-pregnancy counseling, antenatal assessment, and intrapartum decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817776/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07239-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07239-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:巨大儿对孕产妇和新生儿健康都有重大风险,然而,准确的产前预测仍然是一个重大挑战。本研究旨在开发机器学习方法,以增强对怀孕不同阶段胎儿巨大儿的预测。方法:对2019年12月至2024年7月在北京清华长庚医院分娩的500名单胎孕妇进行回顾性研究。训练集包括208例巨大儿和208例非巨大儿,另外84例用于外部验证。共有23个候选变量,包括母亲特征、身体测量和实验室测试,用于特征选择。7种算法结合3组选定的特征,得到21个拟合模型。通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、准确度、精密度、灵敏度、特异性和f1评分来评估模型的性能。结果:在训练集中,与非巨大儿组相比,巨大儿组的产妇身高、孕前体重、孕前体重、分娩前体重、出生胎龄、孕期体重增加、男婴比例显著增加(p)。结论:这是第一个利用机器学习与孕前、妊娠早期和分娩前数据来预测巨大儿的研究。逻辑回归模型和最终集成模型显示出较强的预测性能,为改善孕前咨询、产前评估和产时决策提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning approaches for predicting fetal macrosomia at different stages of pregnancy: a retrospective study in China.

Background: Macrosomia presents significant risks to both maternal and neonatal health, however, accurate antenatal prediction remains a major challenge. This study aimed to develop machine learning approaches to enhance the prediction of fetal macrosomia at different stages of pregnancy.

Methods: This retrospective study involved 500 pregnant women who delivered singleton infants at Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital between December 2019 and July 2024. The training set comprised 208 cases of macrosomia and 208 non-macrosomia cases, with 84 additional cases used for external validation. A total of 23 candidate variables, including maternal characteristics, physical measurements, and laboratory tests were collected for feature selection. Seven algorithms were applied in combination with three sets of selected features, resulting in 21 fitted models. Model performance was evaluated via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score.

Results: Maternal height, pre-pregnancy weight, first-trimester weight, pre-labor weight, gestational age at birth, gestational weight gain, and the proportion of male neonates were significantly greater in the macrosomia group compared to non-macrosomia group in the training set (p < 0.05). The top five predictors for macrosomia were pre-labor weight, gestational weight gain, the Pre-labor Hb/First-trimester Hb ratio, first-trimester Hb, and maternal height. Logistic regression yielded the highest AUC values in the pre-pregnancy (0.790) and first-trimester (0.815) periods in the validation set, whereas the ensemble model achieved the highest AUC value of 0.930 before labor. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis highlighted pre-labor weight, gestational age, gestational weight gain, first-trimester Hb, and neonatal sex as important factors for the prediction of macrosomia.

Conclusion: This is the first study to utilize machine learning with data from the pre-pregnancy, first-trimester, and pre-labor periods to predict macrosomia. The logistic regression model and the final ensemble model demonstrated strong predictive performance, offering valuable insights to improve pre-pregnancy counseling, antenatal assessment, and intrapartum decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
A prospective cohort study comparing IADPSG and DIPSI criteria for diagnosing gestational diabetes and evaluating impact on maternal and neonatal health outcomes (DECIDE study protocol). Perioperative blood glucose and energy management in gestational diabetes mellitus: a survey of obstetric staff from selected regions in China. The relationship between trace element imbalance, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction in preeclampsia diagnosis. Association between infant feeding practices and infant growth by maternal HIV and antiretroviral therapy status: a prospective study in Cape Town, South Africa. Information and practices of antenatal colostrum expression: a cross-sectional study of pregnant women in Norway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1