基于疼痛和选择性去除龋齿组织的时间,使用和不使用化学-机械龋齿去除剂的非创伤性修复治疗的成本效益分析:公共卫生观点。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical Oral Investigations Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1007/s00784-025-06224-5
Rênnis Oliveira da Silva, Luísa Buoro da Silva, Marcia Frias Pinto Marinho, Erico Eduardo Ribeiro de Souza, Yuri Wanderley Cavalcanti, Andréa Fonseca-Gonçalves, Andréa Vaz Braga Pintor
{"title":"基于疼痛和选择性去除龋齿组织的时间,使用和不使用化学-机械龋齿去除剂的非创伤性修复治疗的成本效益分析:公共卫生观点。","authors":"Rênnis Oliveira da Silva, Luísa Buoro da Silva, Marcia Frias Pinto Marinho, Erico Eduardo Ribeiro de Souza, Yuri Wanderley Cavalcanti, Andréa Fonseca-Gonçalves, Andréa Vaz Braga Pintor","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06224-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the Cost-Efficiency of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) with a chemical-mechanical caries removal agent (CMCRA, Papacárie Duo Gel<sup>Ⓡ</sup>) compared to conventional ART, based on pain perceived and time for selective removal of carious tissue, from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Cost-Efficiency analysis was conducted using TreeAgePro software, considering a 12-month horizon and a hypothetical cohort based on Monte Carlo microsimulation. ART + CMCRA was compared to ART in deciduous teeth, based on 26,700 treatments performed on children attended by SUS in Rio de Janeiro. Direct costs were calculated in Brazilian currency using the microcosting technique. Efficiency measures related to pain and caries removal time were extracted from a high-quality randomized clinical trial. Probabilistic simulation considered a 95% confidence interval and a 5% variation in parameters, generating acceptability curves to estimate the probability of treatment choice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ART + CMCRA proved superior (p < 0,001) in terms of benefit. For pain perceived efficiency, ART + CMCRA resulted in a cost increase of R$ 0.23 per procedure, with an additional benefit of 47.53%. For time efficiency, there was a cost increase of R$ 0.24 per procedure, with an additional benefit of 14.19%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ART + CMCRA is a cost-efficient option for SUS. The implementation of this technique in Rio de Janeiro's public health system can be recommended due to the reduced pain, despite requiring a higher willingness to pay for the additional benefits.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The adoption of ART + CMCRA in SUS can significantly improve the experience of pediatric patients by reducing pain, making dental treatment more efficient and humane.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 2","pages":"134"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-efficiency analysis of atraumatic restorative treatment with and without chemical-mechanical caries removal agents based on pain and time for selective removal of carious tissue: a public health perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Rênnis Oliveira da Silva, Luísa Buoro da Silva, Marcia Frias Pinto Marinho, Erico Eduardo Ribeiro de Souza, Yuri Wanderley Cavalcanti, Andréa Fonseca-Gonçalves, Andréa Vaz Braga Pintor\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00784-025-06224-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the Cost-Efficiency of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) with a chemical-mechanical caries removal agent (CMCRA, Papacárie Duo Gel<sup>Ⓡ</sup>) compared to conventional ART, based on pain perceived and time for selective removal of carious tissue, from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Cost-Efficiency analysis was conducted using TreeAgePro software, considering a 12-month horizon and a hypothetical cohort based on Monte Carlo microsimulation. ART + CMCRA was compared to ART in deciduous teeth, based on 26,700 treatments performed on children attended by SUS in Rio de Janeiro. Direct costs were calculated in Brazilian currency using the microcosting technique. Efficiency measures related to pain and caries removal time were extracted from a high-quality randomized clinical trial. Probabilistic simulation considered a 95% confidence interval and a 5% variation in parameters, generating acceptability curves to estimate the probability of treatment choice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ART + CMCRA proved superior (p < 0,001) in terms of benefit. For pain perceived efficiency, ART + CMCRA resulted in a cost increase of R$ 0.23 per procedure, with an additional benefit of 47.53%. For time efficiency, there was a cost increase of R$ 0.24 per procedure, with an additional benefit of 14.19%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ART + CMCRA is a cost-efficient option for SUS. The implementation of this technique in Rio de Janeiro's public health system can be recommended due to the reduced pain, despite requiring a higher willingness to pay for the additional benefits.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The adoption of ART + CMCRA in SUS can significantly improve the experience of pediatric patients by reducing pain, making dental treatment more efficient and humane.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06224-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06224-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:从巴西统一卫生系统(SUS)的角度,基于感知疼痛和选择性去除龋齿组织的时间,评估化学-机械龋齿去除剂(CMCRA, Papacárie Duo GelⓇ)与传统ART相比的成本效益。材料和方法:使用TreeAgePro软件进行成本效益分析,考虑12个月的时间跨度和基于蒙特卡罗微观模拟的假设队列。将ART + CMCRA与ART在乳牙中的应用进行比较,这是基于在巴西里约热内卢接受SUS治疗的26,700例儿童的治疗。直接成本采用微观成本法以巴西货币计算。从一项高质量的随机临床试验中提取与疼痛和龋齿清除时间相关的效率指标。概率模拟考虑95%的置信区间和5%的参数变化,生成可接受曲线来估计治疗选择的概率。结果:ART + CMCRA治疗效果较好(p结论:ART + CMCRA治疗SUS具有成本效益。尽管需要更高的支付意愿来获得额外的好处,但由于减少了疼痛,可以推荐在巴西里约热内卢的公共卫生系统中实施该技术。临床意义:在SUS中采用ART + CMCRA可通过减轻疼痛,显著改善儿科患者的体验,使牙科治疗更加高效和人性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-efficiency analysis of atraumatic restorative treatment with and without chemical-mechanical caries removal agents based on pain and time for selective removal of carious tissue: a public health perspective.

Objective: To evaluate the Cost-Efficiency of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) with a chemical-mechanical caries removal agent (CMCRA, Papacárie Duo Gel) compared to conventional ART, based on pain perceived and time for selective removal of carious tissue, from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS).

Materials and methods: The Cost-Efficiency analysis was conducted using TreeAgePro software, considering a 12-month horizon and a hypothetical cohort based on Monte Carlo microsimulation. ART + CMCRA was compared to ART in deciduous teeth, based on 26,700 treatments performed on children attended by SUS in Rio de Janeiro. Direct costs were calculated in Brazilian currency using the microcosting technique. Efficiency measures related to pain and caries removal time were extracted from a high-quality randomized clinical trial. Probabilistic simulation considered a 95% confidence interval and a 5% variation in parameters, generating acceptability curves to estimate the probability of treatment choice.

Results: ART + CMCRA proved superior (p < 0,001) in terms of benefit. For pain perceived efficiency, ART + CMCRA resulted in a cost increase of R$ 0.23 per procedure, with an additional benefit of 47.53%. For time efficiency, there was a cost increase of R$ 0.24 per procedure, with an additional benefit of 14.19%.

Conclusion: ART + CMCRA is a cost-efficient option for SUS. The implementation of this technique in Rio de Janeiro's public health system can be recommended due to the reduced pain, despite requiring a higher willingness to pay for the additional benefits.

Clinical relevance: The adoption of ART + CMCRA in SUS can significantly improve the experience of pediatric patients by reducing pain, making dental treatment more efficient and humane.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
期刊最新文献
Dimensional and colorimetric changes of keratinized tissue following free gingival grafts around teeth: a prospective clinical study. Antibiotic resistance in odontogenic infections: A systematic review of current evidence and implications for guideline-based therapy. Caries prevention in permanent teeth - basic recommendations of the German S 3 guideline. Quality assessment of anterior composite restorations: clinical examination versus three digital photographic techniques. Oral microbiome profiling of primary oral candidiasis during infection and post-antifungal therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1