最大限度地提高严重事故模拟的准确性:WWER-1000中车站停电期间MELCOR代码采样方法的深入分析

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Nuclear Engineering and Design Pub Date : 2025-04-15 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.113925
R. Gharari , R. Ahangari , E. Hasanifard , B. Roostaii
{"title":"最大限度地提高严重事故模拟的准确性:WWER-1000中车站停电期间MELCOR代码采样方法的深入分析","authors":"R. Gharari ,&nbsp;R. Ahangari ,&nbsp;E. Hasanifard ,&nbsp;B. Roostaii","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.113925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the uncertainty in severe accident analysis of nuclear power plants, focusing on the thermal–hydraulic parameters of the WWER1000 reactor during station black-out scenarios. The primary challenge in such analyses lies in the inherent uncertainties associated with the simplifying assumptions embedded in computational codes. To address this, five prominent sampling methods—simple generation sampling, Latin hypercube sampling, SOBOL, HALTON, and LHS-SOBOL—are applied to improve the MELCOR code’s predictive accuracy. The results highlight that SGS produces non-uniform input distributions and performs poorly in comparison to the other methods. Additionally, key parameters, including hydrogen production, maximum containment pressure, and reactor pressure vessel rupture time, show significant variability, ranging from 150 to 602 kg, 14,100 to 28,000 s, and 0.62 to 1.05 MPa, respectively, with a 95 % confidence level. The findings emphasize the importance of selecting robust sampling techniques for enhancing the reliability of nuclear safety assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"435 ","pages":"Article 113925"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maximizing accuracy in severe accident simulations: An In-depth analysis of sampling methods for MELCOR code during station black-out in WWER-1000\",\"authors\":\"R. Gharari ,&nbsp;R. Ahangari ,&nbsp;E. Hasanifard ,&nbsp;B. Roostaii\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.113925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores the uncertainty in severe accident analysis of nuclear power plants, focusing on the thermal–hydraulic parameters of the WWER1000 reactor during station black-out scenarios. The primary challenge in such analyses lies in the inherent uncertainties associated with the simplifying assumptions embedded in computational codes. To address this, five prominent sampling methods—simple generation sampling, Latin hypercube sampling, SOBOL, HALTON, and LHS-SOBOL—are applied to improve the MELCOR code’s predictive accuracy. The results highlight that SGS produces non-uniform input distributions and performs poorly in comparison to the other methods. Additionally, key parameters, including hydrogen production, maximum containment pressure, and reactor pressure vessel rupture time, show significant variability, ranging from 150 to 602 kg, 14,100 to 28,000 s, and 0.62 to 1.05 MPa, respectively, with a 95 % confidence level. The findings emphasize the importance of selecting robust sampling techniques for enhancing the reliability of nuclear safety assessments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Engineering and Design\",\"volume\":\"435 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113925\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Engineering and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325001025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325001025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了核电厂严重事故分析中的不确定性,重点研究了电站停电情景下WWER1000反应堆的热工水力参数。这种分析的主要挑战在于与计算代码中嵌入的简化假设相关的固有不确定性。为了解决这个问题,五种主要的采样方法——简单生成采样、拉丁超立方体采样、SOBOL、HALTON和lhs -SOBOL——被应用于提高MELCOR代码的预测精度。结果表明,与其他方法相比,SGS产生的输入分布不均匀,性能较差。此外,关键参数,包括氢气产量、最大安全壳压力和反应堆压力容器破裂时间,显示出显著的变化,分别在150至602 kg、14,100至28,000 s和0.62至1.05 MPa之间,置信度为95%。研究结果强调了选择可靠的抽样技术以提高核安全评估可靠性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maximizing accuracy in severe accident simulations: An In-depth analysis of sampling methods for MELCOR code during station black-out in WWER-1000
This study explores the uncertainty in severe accident analysis of nuclear power plants, focusing on the thermal–hydraulic parameters of the WWER1000 reactor during station black-out scenarios. The primary challenge in such analyses lies in the inherent uncertainties associated with the simplifying assumptions embedded in computational codes. To address this, five prominent sampling methods—simple generation sampling, Latin hypercube sampling, SOBOL, HALTON, and LHS-SOBOL—are applied to improve the MELCOR code’s predictive accuracy. The results highlight that SGS produces non-uniform input distributions and performs poorly in comparison to the other methods. Additionally, key parameters, including hydrogen production, maximum containment pressure, and reactor pressure vessel rupture time, show significant variability, ranging from 150 to 602 kg, 14,100 to 28,000 s, and 0.62 to 1.05 MPa, respectively, with a 95 % confidence level. The findings emphasize the importance of selecting robust sampling techniques for enhancing the reliability of nuclear safety assessments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Nuclear Engineering and Design 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
377
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology. Fundamentals of Reactor Design include: • Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics • Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA) • Structural and Mechanical Engineering • Materials Science • Fuel Behavior and Design • Structural Plant Design • Engineering of Reactor Components • Experiments Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered: • Accident Mitigation Measures • Reactor Control Systems • Licensing Issues • Safeguard Engineering • Economy of Plants • Reprocessing / Waste Disposal • Applications of Nuclear Energy • Maintenance • Decommissioning Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Numerical study on the influence of internal heat generation on mixed convection heat transfer in a horizontal laminar pipe flow with wall cooling CRAFTY – A new separate-effect-test facility at LUT University for two-phase critical flow studies in transient nature Conclusions of OECD/NEA project on ‘LTO beyond 60 years’ Leveraging the High Flux Isotope Reactor for nuclear fuel development: a review of experiments, facilities, and capabilities Numerical investigation of abrupt pipe cross-sectional area changes on the occurrence of condensation-induced water hammer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1