Heng Gong , Thi Ngoc Phuong Le , Louisa Buckingham
{"title":"跨imrd结构医学研究文章部分的词汇束:注册域内的视角","authors":"Heng Gong , Thi Ngoc Phuong Le , Louisa Buckingham","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Employing a corpus of 1533 research articles in Medicine with a typical macrostructure pattern IMRD, this study investigates the cross-sectional distribution of four-word lexical bundles. The results show significant differences across the four IMRD sections in terms of the frequency of lexical bundle functions: both text- and participant-oriented bundles show a significant decreasing frequency distribution of D > I > R > M, while the pattern for research-oriented bundles is M > R > I > D. We find each section has one predominant lexical bundle: transition signals with I, procedure bundles with M, statistical reference bundles with R, and engagement bundles in D. We find within-register similarities in the bundle-functional profiles of I and D, R and D, M and R, and I and M. We explain these associations in light of the rhetorical functions of the IMRD sections and the embedded disciplinary culture of Medicine research. We draw on these within-register variations and similarities in formulating relevant pedagogical implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101487"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lexical bundles across IMRD-structured Medicine research article sections: A within-register perspective\",\"authors\":\"Heng Gong , Thi Ngoc Phuong Le , Louisa Buckingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Employing a corpus of 1533 research articles in Medicine with a typical macrostructure pattern IMRD, this study investigates the cross-sectional distribution of four-word lexical bundles. The results show significant differences across the four IMRD sections in terms of the frequency of lexical bundle functions: both text- and participant-oriented bundles show a significant decreasing frequency distribution of D > I > R > M, while the pattern for research-oriented bundles is M > R > I > D. We find each section has one predominant lexical bundle: transition signals with I, procedure bundles with M, statistical reference bundles with R, and engagement bundles in D. We find within-register similarities in the bundle-functional profiles of I and D, R and D, M and R, and I and M. We explain these associations in light of the rhetorical functions of the IMRD sections and the embedded disciplinary culture of Medicine research. We draw on these within-register variations and similarities in formulating relevant pedagogical implications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of English for Academic Purposes\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101487\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of English for Academic Purposes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158525000189\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158525000189","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lexical bundles across IMRD-structured Medicine research article sections: A within-register perspective
Employing a corpus of 1533 research articles in Medicine with a typical macrostructure pattern IMRD, this study investigates the cross-sectional distribution of four-word lexical bundles. The results show significant differences across the four IMRD sections in terms of the frequency of lexical bundle functions: both text- and participant-oriented bundles show a significant decreasing frequency distribution of D > I > R > M, while the pattern for research-oriented bundles is M > R > I > D. We find each section has one predominant lexical bundle: transition signals with I, procedure bundles with M, statistical reference bundles with R, and engagement bundles in D. We find within-register similarities in the bundle-functional profiles of I and D, R and D, M and R, and I and M. We explain these associations in light of the rhetorical functions of the IMRD sections and the embedded disciplinary culture of Medicine research. We draw on these within-register variations and similarities in formulating relevant pedagogical implications.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of English for Academic Purposes provides a forum for the dissemination of information and views which enables practitioners of and researchers in EAP to keep current with developments in their field and to contribute to its continued updating. JEAP publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges in the linguistic, sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic description of English as it occurs in the contexts of academic study and scholarly exchange itself.