IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain communications Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf006
Seyyed Bahram Borgheai, Enrico Opri, Faical Isbaine, Eric R Cole, Roohollah Jafari Deligani, Nealen G Laxpati, Benjamin B Risk, Jon T Willie, Robert E Gross, Nicholas AuYong, Cameron C McIntyre, Svjetlana Miocinovic
{"title":"Neural pathway activation in the subthalamic region depends on stimulation polarity.","authors":"Seyyed Bahram Borgheai, Enrico Opri, Faical Isbaine, Eric R Cole, Roohollah Jafari Deligani, Nealen G Laxpati, Benjamin B Risk, Jon T Willie, Robert E Gross, Nicholas AuYong, Cameron C McIntyre, Svjetlana Miocinovic","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcaf006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease; however, there is limited understanding of which subthalamic pathways are recruited in response to stimulation. Here, by focusing on the polarity of the stimulus waveform (cathodic versus anodic), our goal was to elucidate biophysical mechanisms that underlie electrical stimulation in the human brain. In clinical studies, cathodic stimulation more easily triggers behavioural responses, but anodic DBS broadens the therapeutic window. This suggests that neural pathways involved respond preferentially depending on stimulus polarity. To experimentally compare the activation of therapeutically relevant pathways during cathodic and anodic subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS, pathway activation was quantified by measuring evoked potentials resulting from antidromic or orthodromic activation in 15 Parkinson's disease patients undergoing DBS implantation. Cortical evoked potentials (cEPs) were recorded using subdural electrocorticography, DBS local evoked potentials (DLEPs) were recorded from non-stimulating contacts, and electromyography activity was recorded from arm and face muscles. We measured (i) the amplitude of short-latency cEP, previously demonstrated to reflect activation of the cortico-STN hyperdirect pathway, (ii) DLEP amplitude thought to reflect activation of STN-globus pallidus (GP) pathway and (iii) amplitudes of very short-latency cEPs and motor evoked potentials for activation of corticospinal/bulbar tract (CSBT). We constructed recruitment and strength-duration curves for each EP/pathway to compare the excitability for different stimulation polarities. We compared experimental data with the most advanced DBS computational models. Our results provide experimental evidence that subcortical cathodic and anodic stimulation activate the same pathways in the STN region and that cathodic stimulation is in general more efficient. However, relative efficiency varies for different pathways so that anodic stimulation is the least efficient in activating CSBT, more efficient in activating the hyperdirect pathway and as efficient as cathodic in activating STN-GP pathway. Our experiments confirm biophysical model predictions regarding neural activations in the central nervous system and provide evidence that stimulus polarity has differential effects on passing axons, terminal synapses, and local neurons. Comparison of experimental results with clinical DBS studies provides further evidence that the hyperdirect pathway may be involved in the therapeutic mechanisms of DBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"7 1","pages":"fcaf006"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深部脑刺激(DBS)是治疗帕金森病的一种有效方法;然而,人们对哪些丘脑下通路会对刺激做出反应的了解还很有限。在这里,通过关注刺激波形的极性(阴极与阳极),我们的目标是阐明人脑电刺激的生物物理机制。在临床研究中,阴极刺激更容易引发行为反应,而阳极 DBS 则扩大了治疗窗口。这表明,根据刺激极性的不同,相关神经通路会优先做出反应。为了在实验中比较阴极和阳极间脑下核(STN)DBS 期间激活治疗相关通路的情况,我们对 15 名接受 DBS 植入的帕金森病患者进行了量化,测量了反向或正向激活产生的诱发电位。皮层诱发电位(cEPs)通过硬膜下皮层电图记录,DBS 局部诱发电位(DLEPs)通过非刺激性接触记录,肌电图活动通过手臂和脸部肌肉记录。我们测量了:(i) 短延时 cEP 的振幅(之前已证明它反映了皮质-STN 超直达通路的激活);(ii) DLEP 的振幅(认为它反映了 STN-苍白球(GP)通路的激活);(iii) 极短延时 cEP 和运动诱发电位的振幅(反映了皮质脊髓/球束(CSBT)的激活)。我们为每个 EP/通路构建了招募和强度-持续时间曲线,以比较不同刺激极性的兴奋性。我们将实验数据与最先进的 DBS 计算模型进行了比较。我们的结果提供了实验证据,证明皮层下阴极和阳极刺激激活了 STN 区域的相同通路,而且阴极刺激一般更有效。但是,不同通路的相对效率不同,因此阳极刺激激活 CSBT 的效率最低,激活 hyperdirect 通路的效率较高,激活 STN-GP 通路的效率与阴极刺激相当。我们的实验证实了生物物理模型对中枢神经系统神经激活的预测,并提供了刺激极性对通过的轴突、末端突触和局部神经元有不同影响的证据。实验结果与临床 DBS 研究结果的比较进一步证明了超直接通路可能参与了 DBS 的治疗机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neural pathway activation in the subthalamic region depends on stimulation polarity.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease; however, there is limited understanding of which subthalamic pathways are recruited in response to stimulation. Here, by focusing on the polarity of the stimulus waveform (cathodic versus anodic), our goal was to elucidate biophysical mechanisms that underlie electrical stimulation in the human brain. In clinical studies, cathodic stimulation more easily triggers behavioural responses, but anodic DBS broadens the therapeutic window. This suggests that neural pathways involved respond preferentially depending on stimulus polarity. To experimentally compare the activation of therapeutically relevant pathways during cathodic and anodic subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS, pathway activation was quantified by measuring evoked potentials resulting from antidromic or orthodromic activation in 15 Parkinson's disease patients undergoing DBS implantation. Cortical evoked potentials (cEPs) were recorded using subdural electrocorticography, DBS local evoked potentials (DLEPs) were recorded from non-stimulating contacts, and electromyography activity was recorded from arm and face muscles. We measured (i) the amplitude of short-latency cEP, previously demonstrated to reflect activation of the cortico-STN hyperdirect pathway, (ii) DLEP amplitude thought to reflect activation of STN-globus pallidus (GP) pathway and (iii) amplitudes of very short-latency cEPs and motor evoked potentials for activation of corticospinal/bulbar tract (CSBT). We constructed recruitment and strength-duration curves for each EP/pathway to compare the excitability for different stimulation polarities. We compared experimental data with the most advanced DBS computational models. Our results provide experimental evidence that subcortical cathodic and anodic stimulation activate the same pathways in the STN region and that cathodic stimulation is in general more efficient. However, relative efficiency varies for different pathways so that anodic stimulation is the least efficient in activating CSBT, more efficient in activating the hyperdirect pathway and as efficient as cathodic in activating STN-GP pathway. Our experiments confirm biophysical model predictions regarding neural activations in the central nervous system and provide evidence that stimulus polarity has differential effects on passing axons, terminal synapses, and local neurons. Comparison of experimental results with clinical DBS studies provides further evidence that the hyperdirect pathway may be involved in the therapeutic mechanisms of DBS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
'Hyperbinding' in functional movement disorders: role of supplementary motor area efferent signalling. Response to: 'Hyperbinding' in functional movement disorders: role of supplementary motor area efferent signalling. Diffuse nuclear Overhauser effect MRI contrast changes detected in multiple sclerosis subjects at 7T. Glymphatic dysfunction exacerbates cognitive decline by triggering cortical degeneration in Parkinson's disease: evidence from diffusion-tensor MRI. The elusive relationship between retinal anatomy and brain amyloid.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1