糖尿病患者能量消耗与截肢水平的比较。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY Wound Repair and Regeneration Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1111/wrr.70007
Jan Karel Petric, Matthew J Johnson, Kelly Jeans, Ariel R G Fortenberry, Jijia Wang, Kirsten Tulchin-Francis, Dane K Wukich, Tiffany D F Graham
{"title":"糖尿病患者能量消耗与截肢水平的比较。","authors":"Jan Karel Petric, Matthew J Johnson, Kelly Jeans, Ariel R G Fortenberry, Jijia Wang, Kirsten Tulchin-Francis, Dane K Wukich, Tiffany D F Graham","doi":"10.1111/wrr.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the leading cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputations in the USA. After these amputations, patients exhibit reduced mobility and increased energy demands of walking. The best surgical practice is to preserve as much of a functional limb as possible, in part due to the fact that proximal amputations result in a greater increase in energy expenditure compared to more distal amputations. While differences in transfemoral, transtibial and partial foot amputation levels have been previously documented, no studies have directly compared transtibial and transmetatarsal amputees. The present study aimed to compare energy expenditure and patient-reported outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus who have undergone transmetatrsal (TMA) and transtibial amputations (TTA). Thirty-nine DM participants with either unilateral TMA, unilateral TTA or no amputations (control group) participated in this observational study. Energy expenditure, heart rate (HR) and distance travelled during six-minute walk test (6MWT), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) were measured at a single research visit. No significant differences between the three groups were detected in energy expenditure, HR or distance covered during 6MWT, as well as in PROMIS-29 or FAAM patient-reported outcomes. While the results of this study suggest no differences in functional and patient-reported outcomes between transmetatarsal and transtibial amputees, a larger sample size that would allow for control of comorbidities is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23864,"journal":{"name":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","volume":"33 1","pages":"e70007"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11848010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of energy expenditure with level of amputation in patients with diabetes mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Jan Karel Petric, Matthew J Johnson, Kelly Jeans, Ariel R G Fortenberry, Jijia Wang, Kirsten Tulchin-Francis, Dane K Wukich, Tiffany D F Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/wrr.70007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the leading cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputations in the USA. After these amputations, patients exhibit reduced mobility and increased energy demands of walking. The best surgical practice is to preserve as much of a functional limb as possible, in part due to the fact that proximal amputations result in a greater increase in energy expenditure compared to more distal amputations. While differences in transfemoral, transtibial and partial foot amputation levels have been previously documented, no studies have directly compared transtibial and transmetatarsal amputees. The present study aimed to compare energy expenditure and patient-reported outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus who have undergone transmetatrsal (TMA) and transtibial amputations (TTA). Thirty-nine DM participants with either unilateral TMA, unilateral TTA or no amputations (control group) participated in this observational study. Energy expenditure, heart rate (HR) and distance travelled during six-minute walk test (6MWT), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) were measured at a single research visit. No significant differences between the three groups were detected in energy expenditure, HR or distance covered during 6MWT, as well as in PROMIS-29 or FAAM patient-reported outcomes. While the results of this study suggest no differences in functional and patient-reported outcomes between transmetatarsal and transtibial amputees, a larger sample size that would allow for control of comorbidities is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wound Repair and Regeneration\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"e70007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11848010/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wound Repair and Regeneration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.70007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.70007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病(DM)是美国非创伤性下肢截肢的主要原因。截肢后,患者表现出活动能力下降和行走能量需求增加。最好的手术做法是尽可能多地保留肢体功能,部分原因是近端截肢比远端截肢会导致能量消耗增加更多。虽然经股骨、经胫骨和部分足截肢水平的差异先前有文献记载,但没有研究直接比较经胫骨和经跖骨截肢者。本研究旨在比较接受经跖骨(TMA)和经胫骨截肢(TTA)的糖尿病患者的能量消耗和患者报告的结果。39名单侧TMA、单侧TTA或未截肢的DM参与者(对照组)参加了这项观察性研究。在一次研究访问中测量了6分钟步行测试(6MWT)期间的能量消耗、心率(HR)和行走距离、足踝能力测量(FAAM)和患者报告的结果测量信息系统(promise -29)。在6MWT期间,三组之间的能量消耗、HR或覆盖距离以及promise -29或FAAM患者报告的结果没有发现显着差异。虽然本研究结果表明经跖骨和经胫截肢者在功能和患者报告的结果上没有差异,但需要更大的样本量来控制合并症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of energy expenditure with level of amputation in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the leading cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputations in the USA. After these amputations, patients exhibit reduced mobility and increased energy demands of walking. The best surgical practice is to preserve as much of a functional limb as possible, in part due to the fact that proximal amputations result in a greater increase in energy expenditure compared to more distal amputations. While differences in transfemoral, transtibial and partial foot amputation levels have been previously documented, no studies have directly compared transtibial and transmetatarsal amputees. The present study aimed to compare energy expenditure and patient-reported outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus who have undergone transmetatrsal (TMA) and transtibial amputations (TTA). Thirty-nine DM participants with either unilateral TMA, unilateral TTA or no amputations (control group) participated in this observational study. Energy expenditure, heart rate (HR) and distance travelled during six-minute walk test (6MWT), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) were measured at a single research visit. No significant differences between the three groups were detected in energy expenditure, HR or distance covered during 6MWT, as well as in PROMIS-29 or FAAM patient-reported outcomes. While the results of this study suggest no differences in functional and patient-reported outcomes between transmetatarsal and transtibial amputees, a larger sample size that would allow for control of comorbidities is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Wound Repair and Regeneration 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wound Repair and Regeneration provides extensive international coverage of cellular and molecular biology, connective tissue, and biological mediator studies in the field of tissue repair and regeneration and serves a diverse audience of surgeons, plastic surgeons, dermatologists, biochemists, cell biologists, and others. Wound Repair and Regeneration is the official journal of The Wound Healing Society, The European Tissue Repair Society, The Japanese Society for Wound Healing, and The Australian Wound Management Association.
期刊最新文献
High-Frequency Ultrasound Evaluation of Cutaneous Surgical Wound Healing: An Outpatient Experience. Dendritic Cell-Associated MARCKSL1 Regulates Fibroblast Differentiation During Wound Healing. Incisional Hernia Development: Wound Healing Gone Wrong? Transcriptomics in Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU): A Systematic Review. Folinic Acid Improves Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1