多金属盐地质弃置设施的安全评估:荷兰案例

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gete.2025.100645
Jeroen Bartol, Marja Vuorio
{"title":"多金属盐地质弃置设施的安全评估:荷兰案例","authors":"Jeroen Bartol,&nbsp;Marja Vuorio","doi":"10.1016/j.gete.2025.100645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the Netherlands, all radioactive waste is currently collected and stored above ground for at least 100 years by COVRA. After 100 years, all radioactive waste must be permanently disposed of. One option for permanent disposal currently considered is a purpose-built geological disposal facility in rock salt, where a combination of natural and engineered barriers is expected to provide the necessary safety. Rock salt, as a natural barrier, is considered impermeable when undisturbed. Therefore, radionuclides can only reach the surface via the mined openings of the geological disposal facility. Here, multiple engineered barriers provide the necessary safety. In the short term, these include concrete seals, HLW packages, and waste forms. In the long term, moisturized granular salt backfill provides containment. Here, we present the safety assessment of a geological disposal facility in rock salt, using the updated Dutch disposal concept and waste inventory. In total, seven different scenarios are modelled: the (1) normal evolution scenario in which the geological disposal facility evolves as expected, and six alternative scenarios: failure of (2) the high level waste packages, (3) failure of the tunnel seals, (4) failure of the spiral ramp seal, (5) flow path between a brine pocket and mine excavations, (6) less probable characteristics of radionuclide mobilization and transport, (7) and reduced long-term sealing by backfill. Model results show that when the geological disposal facility evolves as expected, no release of radionuclides is expected. Likewise, no release is expected in the six alternative scenarios, although differences exist in the extent to which radionuclides are able to travel within the geological disposal facility. These results indicate that the engineered barriers, combined with the natural barrier of the rock salt, are effective in isolating and providing containment during at the least the first million years after closure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56008,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100645"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety assessment for a geological disposal facility in domal salt: The Dutch case\",\"authors\":\"Jeroen Bartol,&nbsp;Marja Vuorio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gete.2025.100645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the Netherlands, all radioactive waste is currently collected and stored above ground for at least 100 years by COVRA. After 100 years, all radioactive waste must be permanently disposed of. One option for permanent disposal currently considered is a purpose-built geological disposal facility in rock salt, where a combination of natural and engineered barriers is expected to provide the necessary safety. Rock salt, as a natural barrier, is considered impermeable when undisturbed. Therefore, radionuclides can only reach the surface via the mined openings of the geological disposal facility. Here, multiple engineered barriers provide the necessary safety. In the short term, these include concrete seals, HLW packages, and waste forms. In the long term, moisturized granular salt backfill provides containment. Here, we present the safety assessment of a geological disposal facility in rock salt, using the updated Dutch disposal concept and waste inventory. In total, seven different scenarios are modelled: the (1) normal evolution scenario in which the geological disposal facility evolves as expected, and six alternative scenarios: failure of (2) the high level waste packages, (3) failure of the tunnel seals, (4) failure of the spiral ramp seal, (5) flow path between a brine pocket and mine excavations, (6) less probable characteristics of radionuclide mobilization and transport, (7) and reduced long-term sealing by backfill. Model results show that when the geological disposal facility evolves as expected, no release of radionuclides is expected. Likewise, no release is expected in the six alternative scenarios, although differences exist in the extent to which radionuclides are able to travel within the geological disposal facility. These results indicate that the engineered barriers, combined with the natural barrier of the rock salt, are effective in isolating and providing containment during at the least the first million years after closure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100645\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352380825000103\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352380825000103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety assessment for a geological disposal facility in domal salt: The Dutch case
In the Netherlands, all radioactive waste is currently collected and stored above ground for at least 100 years by COVRA. After 100 years, all radioactive waste must be permanently disposed of. One option for permanent disposal currently considered is a purpose-built geological disposal facility in rock salt, where a combination of natural and engineered barriers is expected to provide the necessary safety. Rock salt, as a natural barrier, is considered impermeable when undisturbed. Therefore, radionuclides can only reach the surface via the mined openings of the geological disposal facility. Here, multiple engineered barriers provide the necessary safety. In the short term, these include concrete seals, HLW packages, and waste forms. In the long term, moisturized granular salt backfill provides containment. Here, we present the safety assessment of a geological disposal facility in rock salt, using the updated Dutch disposal concept and waste inventory. In total, seven different scenarios are modelled: the (1) normal evolution scenario in which the geological disposal facility evolves as expected, and six alternative scenarios: failure of (2) the high level waste packages, (3) failure of the tunnel seals, (4) failure of the spiral ramp seal, (5) flow path between a brine pocket and mine excavations, (6) less probable characteristics of radionuclide mobilization and transport, (7) and reduced long-term sealing by backfill. Model results show that when the geological disposal facility evolves as expected, no release of radionuclides is expected. Likewise, no release is expected in the six alternative scenarios, although differences exist in the extent to which radionuclides are able to travel within the geological disposal facility. These results indicate that the engineered barriers, combined with the natural barrier of the rock salt, are effective in isolating and providing containment during at the least the first million years after closure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment
Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal is to publish research results of the highest quality and of lasting importance on the subject of geomechanics, with the focus on applications to geological energy production and storage, and the interaction of soils and rocks with the natural and engineered environment. Special attention is given to concepts and developments of new energy geotechnologies that comprise intrinsic mechanisms protecting the environment against a potential engineering induced damage, hence warranting sustainable usage of energy resources. The scope of the journal is broad, including fundamental concepts in geomechanics and mechanics of porous media, the experiments and analysis of novel phenomena and applications. Of special interest are issues resulting from coupling of particular physics, chemistry and biology of external forcings, as well as of pore fluid/gas and minerals to the solid mechanics of the medium skeleton and pore fluid mechanics. The multi-scale and inter-scale interactions between the phenomena and the behavior representations are also of particular interest. Contributions to general theoretical approach to these issues, but of potential reference to geomechanics in its context of energy and the environment are also most welcome.
期刊最新文献
Study on novel alkali-activated cementitious grout for scour control of offshore foundation Designing a repository in domal salt: The influence of design variants in different modelling environments Settlement analysis in the context of underground climate change Experimental study of evaporation from soil-atmosphere interfaces Impact of flow direction and soil characteristics on suffusion susceptibility: Analyzing soil resistance and filtration effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1