将2019-2021年英国洪水置于先行条件的背景下

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Flood Risk Management Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1111/jfr3.70016
Adam Griffin, Gianni Vesuviano, Donna Wilson, Catherine Sefton, Stephen Turner, Rachael Armitage, Gayatri Suman
{"title":"将2019-2021年英国洪水置于先行条件的背景下","authors":"Adam Griffin,&nbsp;Gianni Vesuviano,&nbsp;Donna Wilson,&nbsp;Catherine Sefton,&nbsp;Stephen Turner,&nbsp;Rachael Armitage,&nbsp;Gayatri Suman","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>England experienced a sequence of extreme flood events between June 2019 and April 2021. To understand the severity and likelihood of the events, a set of over 300 flow and river level stations was investigated for key events (identified by Environment Agency Area Teams), focusing on frequency analysis of peak flow, peak level and cumulative flow volume. In addition, groundwater, soil moisture and seasonal total rainfall were analysed to understand the antecedent conditions affecting the impacts of the rainfall experienced. While the period contained some of the wettest months on record, there were few extreme short-duration rainfall events. Record-breaking flows and river levels were seen across the country, in part due to the extreme antecedent conditions where many parts of England had record groundwater levels and soil moisture content preceding the events. A kernel density approach was used to identify statistically significant clusters of events over the study period (compared with a Poisson process) and found that most stations in northern and western England experienced a cluster during the study period. Urbanisation was investigated as a possible driver of these trends, but urban increase was not seen to be a significant driver.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Putting the English Flooding of 2019–2021 in the Context of Antecedent Conditions\",\"authors\":\"Adam Griffin,&nbsp;Gianni Vesuviano,&nbsp;Donna Wilson,&nbsp;Catherine Sefton,&nbsp;Stephen Turner,&nbsp;Rachael Armitage,&nbsp;Gayatri Suman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfr3.70016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>England experienced a sequence of extreme flood events between June 2019 and April 2021. To understand the severity and likelihood of the events, a set of over 300 flow and river level stations was investigated for key events (identified by Environment Agency Area Teams), focusing on frequency analysis of peak flow, peak level and cumulative flow volume. In addition, groundwater, soil moisture and seasonal total rainfall were analysed to understand the antecedent conditions affecting the impacts of the rainfall experienced. While the period contained some of the wettest months on record, there were few extreme short-duration rainfall events. Record-breaking flows and river levels were seen across the country, in part due to the extreme antecedent conditions where many parts of England had record groundwater levels and soil moisture content preceding the events. A kernel density approach was used to identify statistically significant clusters of events over the study period (compared with a Poisson process) and found that most stations in northern and western England experienced a cluster during the study period. Urbanisation was investigated as a possible driver of these trends, but urban increase was not seen to be a significant driver.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70016\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70016\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国在2019年6月至2021年4月期间经历了一系列极端洪水事件。为了了解这些事件的严重性和发生的可能性,研究人员对300多个流量和水位站进行了调查,以确定关键事件(由环境署区域小组确定),重点分析峰值流量、峰值水位和累积流量的频率。此外,还分析了地下水、土壤水分和季节总降雨量,以了解影响降雨影响的前因条件。虽然这一时期出现了有记录以来最潮湿的几个月,但很少出现极端的短时间降雨事件。全国各地都出现了破纪录的流量和河流水位,部分原因是极端的前期条件,在事件发生之前,英格兰许多地区的地下水水位和土壤含水量都达到了创纪录的水平。核密度方法用于确定研究期间统计上显著的事件集群(与泊松过程相比),并发现英格兰北部和西部的大多数站点在研究期间经历了集群。城市化作为这些趋势的可能驱动因素进行了调查,但城市增长并不是一个重要的驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Putting the English Flooding of 2019–2021 in the Context of Antecedent Conditions

England experienced a sequence of extreme flood events between June 2019 and April 2021. To understand the severity and likelihood of the events, a set of over 300 flow and river level stations was investigated for key events (identified by Environment Agency Area Teams), focusing on frequency analysis of peak flow, peak level and cumulative flow volume. In addition, groundwater, soil moisture and seasonal total rainfall were analysed to understand the antecedent conditions affecting the impacts of the rainfall experienced. While the period contained some of the wettest months on record, there were few extreme short-duration rainfall events. Record-breaking flows and river levels were seen across the country, in part due to the extreme antecedent conditions where many parts of England had record groundwater levels and soil moisture content preceding the events. A kernel density approach was used to identify statistically significant clusters of events over the study period (compared with a Poisson process) and found that most stations in northern and western England experienced a cluster during the study period. Urbanisation was investigated as a possible driver of these trends, but urban increase was not seen to be a significant driver.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
期刊最新文献
Correction to “Empowering Communities Through Urban Flood Resilience: A New Vision for Sustainable Drainage Delivery” Performance Evaluation of Automated Flood Inundation Mapping Techniques Using Multi-Temporal Sentinel-1 SAR Data Rainstorm Flood Risk Assessment in the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor Under Different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways of the 21st Century Issue Information From Forecast to Action: Using Flood Impact Storylines to Optimize Mobile Levee Deployment and Emergency Response Strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1