确定未满足的医疗保健需求的肾移植受者经历移植物损失:从患者的经验学习。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000005364
Anita Marie Slominska, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella, M Khaled Shamseddin, Saly El Wazze, Kathleen Gaudio, Amanda Vinson, Ann Bugeja, Marie-Chantal Fortin, Marcelo Cantarovich, Julie Ho, Shaifali Sandal
{"title":"确定未满足的医疗保健需求的肾移植受者经历移植物损失:从患者的经验学习。","authors":"Anita Marie Slominska, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella, M Khaled Shamseddin, Saly El Wazze, Kathleen Gaudio, Amanda Vinson, Ann Bugeja, Marie-Chantal Fortin, Marcelo Cantarovich, Julie Ho, Shaifali Sandal","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney transplant recipients with graft loss (KTR-GL) are an increasing group of patients whose care needs are largely unmet. The lack of patient perspectives is a key research gap. We conducted an in-depth exploration of the experiences of KTR-GL to identify their healthcare needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study adopted an interpretive descriptive methodology. Data collection entailed semistructured narrative interviews conducted until data saturation was achieved and was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample included 23 KTR-GL (women: 34.8%; mean age, 54.3 y). Six themes were identified that represent areas in which participants' needs may be inadequately acknowledged and/or met: (1) setting expectations (longevity of the graft, transplant is not a cure, risk of graft failure, anticipating transplant loss, and balancing hope and realism), (2) communicating with care team (support and empathy and clarifying the cause of graft failure), (3) support for transition to dialysis (shaped by prior experience, preparedness for the initiation of dialysis, lack of options, and dialysis requires adjustment), (4) navigating the path to retransplantation (understanding patient preferences, clarity and transparency, addressing ineligibility, preemptive transplant, and living donation), (5) psychosocial resources (access to psychological services, specific and adequate psychological support, reliable social worker, and peer support), and (6) lessons learned (building mutual trust, self-advocacy, defining a successful transplant, and gaining resilience).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this in-depth exploration of the experiences of KTR-GL, we have identified several unmet healthcare needs that have practice and policy implications. Incorporating a patient-centered approach is needed to improve the healthcare experiences and, potentially, the outcomes of KTR-GL.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"1425-1436"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying the Unmet Healthcare Needs of Kidney Transplant Recipients Who Experience Graft Loss: Learning From Patients' Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Anita Marie Slominska, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella, M Khaled Shamseddin, Saly El Wazze, Kathleen Gaudio, Amanda Vinson, Ann Bugeja, Marie-Chantal Fortin, Marcelo Cantarovich, Julie Ho, Shaifali Sandal\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TP.0000000000005364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney transplant recipients with graft loss (KTR-GL) are an increasing group of patients whose care needs are largely unmet. The lack of patient perspectives is a key research gap. We conducted an in-depth exploration of the experiences of KTR-GL to identify their healthcare needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study adopted an interpretive descriptive methodology. Data collection entailed semistructured narrative interviews conducted until data saturation was achieved and was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample included 23 KTR-GL (women: 34.8%; mean age, 54.3 y). Six themes were identified that represent areas in which participants' needs may be inadequately acknowledged and/or met: (1) setting expectations (longevity of the graft, transplant is not a cure, risk of graft failure, anticipating transplant loss, and balancing hope and realism), (2) communicating with care team (support and empathy and clarifying the cause of graft failure), (3) support for transition to dialysis (shaped by prior experience, preparedness for the initiation of dialysis, lack of options, and dialysis requires adjustment), (4) navigating the path to retransplantation (understanding patient preferences, clarity and transparency, addressing ineligibility, preemptive transplant, and living donation), (5) psychosocial resources (access to psychological services, specific and adequate psychological support, reliable social worker, and peer support), and (6) lessons learned (building mutual trust, self-advocacy, defining a successful transplant, and gaining resilience).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this in-depth exploration of the experiences of KTR-GL, we have identified several unmet healthcare needs that have practice and policy implications. Incorporating a patient-centered approach is needed to improve the healthcare experiences and, potentially, the outcomes of KTR-GL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1425-1436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005364\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005364","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾移植受者移植物丢失(KTR-GL)是一个越来越多的患者群体,他们的护理需求在很大程度上得不到满足。缺乏患者的观点是一个关键的研究缺口。我们深入研究了KTR-GL的经验,以确定他们的医疗保健需求。方法:本定性研究采用解释性描述方法。数据收集需要进行半结构化的叙述性访谈,直到数据饱和,并使用归纳主题分析进行分析。结果:我们的样本包括23例KTR-GL(女性:34.8%;平均年龄,54.3岁)。确定了六个主题,代表了参与者的需求可能未得到充分承认和/或满足的领域:(1)设定期望(移植物的寿命、移植不能治愈、移植物失败的风险、预测移植物损失、平衡希望和现实),(2)与护理团队沟通(支持和同情并澄清移植物失败的原因),(3)支持过渡到透析(由先前的经验决定,为开始透析做准备,缺乏选择,透析需要调整),(4)引导再移植的路径(了解患者的偏好,明确和透明,解决不合格问题,先发制人的移植和活体捐赠),(5)社会心理资源(获得心理服务,具体和充分的心理支持,可靠的社会工作者和同伴支持),以及(6)经验教训(建立相互信任,自我倡导,定义成功的移植,并获得恢复力)。结论:在对KTR-GL经验的深入探索中,我们确定了几个具有实践和政策意义的未满足的医疗保健需求。需要采用以患者为中心的方法来改善医疗保健体验,并可能改善KTR-GL的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying the Unmet Healthcare Needs of Kidney Transplant Recipients Who Experience Graft Loss: Learning From Patients' Experience.

Background: Kidney transplant recipients with graft loss (KTR-GL) are an increasing group of patients whose care needs are largely unmet. The lack of patient perspectives is a key research gap. We conducted an in-depth exploration of the experiences of KTR-GL to identify their healthcare needs.

Methods: This qualitative study adopted an interpretive descriptive methodology. Data collection entailed semistructured narrative interviews conducted until data saturation was achieved and was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Our sample included 23 KTR-GL (women: 34.8%; mean age, 54.3 y). Six themes were identified that represent areas in which participants' needs may be inadequately acknowledged and/or met: (1) setting expectations (longevity of the graft, transplant is not a cure, risk of graft failure, anticipating transplant loss, and balancing hope and realism), (2) communicating with care team (support and empathy and clarifying the cause of graft failure), (3) support for transition to dialysis (shaped by prior experience, preparedness for the initiation of dialysis, lack of options, and dialysis requires adjustment), (4) navigating the path to retransplantation (understanding patient preferences, clarity and transparency, addressing ineligibility, preemptive transplant, and living donation), (5) psychosocial resources (access to psychological services, specific and adequate psychological support, reliable social worker, and peer support), and (6) lessons learned (building mutual trust, self-advocacy, defining a successful transplant, and gaining resilience).

Conclusions: In this in-depth exploration of the experiences of KTR-GL, we have identified several unmet healthcare needs that have practice and policy implications. Incorporating a patient-centered approach is needed to improve the healthcare experiences and, potentially, the outcomes of KTR-GL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation
Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.30%
发文量
1906
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year. Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal. Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed. The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation. ​
期刊最新文献
Antiobesity Interventions in Living Organ Donor Candidates: Ethical and Policy Considerations. The Natural History of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction in Single and Bilateral Orthotopic Lung Transplant Recipients. Testing Treatments in Posttransplant Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Recurrence. Liver Transplantation Following Organ Donation After Medical Assistance in Dying: One Step Further. Optimizing Matching in Liver Transplantation: Both, Donor and Recipient Age Matter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1