生活质量:在外科实践和研究中一个重要的终点

Hans Troidl , Juergen Kusche, Karl-Heinz Vestweber, Ernst Eypasch, Ludwig Koeppen, Bertil Bouillon
{"title":"生活质量:在外科实践和研究中一个重要的终点","authors":"Hans Troidl ,&nbsp;Juergen Kusche,&nbsp;Karl-Heinz Vestweber,&nbsp;Ernst Eypasch,&nbsp;Ludwig Koeppen,&nbsp;Bertil Bouillon","doi":"10.1016/0021-9681(87)90009-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Surgery asks patients to trade present discomfort and risk for future gains. Although research reports on the effectiveness of surgery have largely focused on mortality, length of hospital stay, major complications, and laboratory analyses, the principal criteria guiding surgeons' clinical decisions and patients' acceptance of treatment are most often the patients' subjective feelings and capabilities, the quality of their lives. This is true for both major and minor surgical procedures. We discuss the role of information on functional capacity, overall well-being, and quality of life in the assessment of surgical outcomes. Broadening the choice of endpoints beyond traditional, so-called “hard” variables in surgical studies has advantages for both surgeons and patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chronic diseases","volume":"40 6","pages":"Pages 523-528"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90009-9","citationCount":"127","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life: An important endpoint both in surgical practice and research\",\"authors\":\"Hans Troidl ,&nbsp;Juergen Kusche,&nbsp;Karl-Heinz Vestweber,&nbsp;Ernst Eypasch,&nbsp;Ludwig Koeppen,&nbsp;Bertil Bouillon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0021-9681(87)90009-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Surgery asks patients to trade present discomfort and risk for future gains. Although research reports on the effectiveness of surgery have largely focused on mortality, length of hospital stay, major complications, and laboratory analyses, the principal criteria guiding surgeons' clinical decisions and patients' acceptance of treatment are most often the patients' subjective feelings and capabilities, the quality of their lives. This is true for both major and minor surgical procedures. We discuss the role of information on functional capacity, overall well-being, and quality of life in the assessment of surgical outcomes. Broadening the choice of endpoints beyond traditional, so-called “hard” variables in surgical studies has advantages for both surgeons and patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chronic diseases\",\"volume\":\"40 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 523-528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90009-9\",\"citationCount\":\"127\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chronic diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021968187900099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chronic diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021968187900099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 127

摘要

手术要求患者为了未来的收益而放弃目前的不适和风险。尽管关于手术有效性的研究报告主要集中在死亡率、住院时间、主要并发症和实验室分析上,但指导外科医生临床决策和患者接受治疗的主要标准通常是患者的主观感受和能力,以及他们的生活质量。无论是大手术还是小手术,都是如此。我们讨论了功能能力、整体健康和生活质量信息在评估手术结果中的作用。在外科研究中,在传统的所谓“硬”变量之外扩大终点的选择对外科医生和患者都有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality of life: An important endpoint both in surgical practice and research

Surgery asks patients to trade present discomfort and risk for future gains. Although research reports on the effectiveness of surgery have largely focused on mortality, length of hospital stay, major complications, and laboratory analyses, the principal criteria guiding surgeons' clinical decisions and patients' acceptance of treatment are most often the patients' subjective feelings and capabilities, the quality of their lives. This is true for both major and minor surgical procedures. We discuss the role of information on functional capacity, overall well-being, and quality of life in the assessment of surgical outcomes. Broadening the choice of endpoints beyond traditional, so-called “hard” variables in surgical studies has advantages for both surgeons and patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the coordination of care. Polyuria. Which 5-ASA? Variation in colonic mucosal concentration of different pharmaceutical mesalamine formulations Author's reply Author's reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1