口服氟喹诺酮类药物与传统静脉抗假单胞菌化疗治疗囊性纤维化的疗效比较。

T Jensen, S S Pedersen, N Høiby, C Koch
{"title":"口服氟喹诺酮类药物与传统静脉抗假单胞菌化疗治疗囊性纤维化的疗效比较。","authors":"T Jensen,&nbsp;S S Pedersen,&nbsp;N Høiby,&nbsp;C Koch","doi":"10.1007/BF02013055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The clinical efficacy of the conventional aminoglycoside plus beta-lactam treatment was compared to that of monotherapy with oral quinolones in 26 adult cystic fibrosis patients in an open prospective clinical trial in which six two-week courses of antipseudomonas treatment were administered with an interval of approximately three months between treatments. In each patient two courses of conventional treatment were followed by two courses of quinolone treatment and then by another two courses of conventional treatment. The observed improvements in pulmonary function were somewhat higher when the patients received conventional treatments, and in the most seriously affected patients conventional treatment was significantly better than quinolone treatment. On the basis of these findings it is suggested that quinolone monotherapy cannot replace conventional antipseudomonal chemotherapy in patients with severe pulmonary involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":11958,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02013055","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of oral fluoroquinolones versus conventional intravenous antipseudomonal chemotherapy in treatment of cystic fibrosis.\",\"authors\":\"T Jensen,&nbsp;S S Pedersen,&nbsp;N Høiby,&nbsp;C Koch\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF02013055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The clinical efficacy of the conventional aminoglycoside plus beta-lactam treatment was compared to that of monotherapy with oral quinolones in 26 adult cystic fibrosis patients in an open prospective clinical trial in which six two-week courses of antipseudomonas treatment were administered with an interval of approximately three months between treatments. In each patient two courses of conventional treatment were followed by two courses of quinolone treatment and then by another two courses of conventional treatment. The observed improvements in pulmonary function were somewhat higher when the patients received conventional treatments, and in the most seriously affected patients conventional treatment was significantly better than quinolone treatment. On the basis of these findings it is suggested that quinolone monotherapy cannot replace conventional antipseudomonal chemotherapy in patients with severe pulmonary involvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02013055\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

在一项开放的前瞻性临床试验中,对26名成人囊性纤维化患者进行了常规氨基糖苷加β -内酰胺治疗与口服喹诺酮类药物单药治疗的临床疗效进行了比较,其中6个为期两周的抗假单胞菌治疗疗程,治疗间隔约为3个月。每位患者在接受两个疗程的常规治疗后,再接受两个疗程的喹诺酮类药物治疗,然后再接受两个疗程的常规治疗。常规治疗对肺功能的改善程度更高,在病情最严重的患者中,常规治疗明显优于喹诺酮治疗。基于这些发现,建议喹诺酮单药治疗不能取代严重肺部受累患者的常规抗假单胞菌化疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of oral fluoroquinolones versus conventional intravenous antipseudomonal chemotherapy in treatment of cystic fibrosis.

The clinical efficacy of the conventional aminoglycoside plus beta-lactam treatment was compared to that of monotherapy with oral quinolones in 26 adult cystic fibrosis patients in an open prospective clinical trial in which six two-week courses of antipseudomonas treatment were administered with an interval of approximately three months between treatments. In each patient two courses of conventional treatment were followed by two courses of quinolone treatment and then by another two courses of conventional treatment. The observed improvements in pulmonary function were somewhat higher when the patients received conventional treatments, and in the most seriously affected patients conventional treatment was significantly better than quinolone treatment. On the basis of these findings it is suggested that quinolone monotherapy cannot replace conventional antipseudomonal chemotherapy in patients with severe pulmonary involvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modulation of human neutrophil and monocyte oxidative burst by Legionella pneumophila sonic extract. Evaluation of three methods for typing herpes simplex virus. Comparative activity of LY146032 against anaerobic cocci. Comparative in vitro activity of the new peptolide antibiotic LY146032 against staphylococci. LY146032 treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis in hamsters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1