普通课程与统一基础-临床课程毕业生的比较。

A Barbato, R Frazier, R Leischner, L Gunzburger, T Loesch, L M Yang
{"title":"普通课程与统一基础-临床课程毕业生的比较。","authors":"A Barbato,&nbsp;R Frazier,&nbsp;R Leischner,&nbsp;L Gunzburger,&nbsp;T Loesch,&nbsp;L M Yang","doi":"10.1097/00001888-198807000-00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study reported here was to identify differences between graduates who were in different curricula at Loyola University of Chicago Stritch School of Medicine. The physicians who had been in the special track, which combined the basic and clinical sciences throughout the program, chose specialties in family practice and psychiatry more than the regular track students and more often were salaried. One-third of those in the special curriculum felt the greatest strength of their medical school training was the preparation for independent learning, and a majority viewed a practice in which there were uncertainties in diagnosis as desirable. The traditional program graduate preferred to deal with cases in which important decisions had to be made rapidly and the effects of treatment could be immediately addressed. The two groups disagreed as to who should have major control of health care, on issues of peer review in the office, and on the emphasis physicians should give preventive care.</p>","PeriodicalId":31052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00001888-198807000-00001","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of graduates of regular curriculum and unified basic-science-clinical curriculum.\",\"authors\":\"A Barbato,&nbsp;R Frazier,&nbsp;R Leischner,&nbsp;L Gunzburger,&nbsp;T Loesch,&nbsp;L M Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/00001888-198807000-00001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of the study reported here was to identify differences between graduates who were in different curricula at Loyola University of Chicago Stritch School of Medicine. The physicians who had been in the special track, which combined the basic and clinical sciences throughout the program, chose specialties in family practice and psychiatry more than the regular track students and more often were salaried. One-third of those in the special curriculum felt the greatest strength of their medical school training was the preparation for independent learning, and a majority viewed a practice in which there were uncertainties in diagnosis as desirable. The traditional program graduate preferred to deal with cases in which important decisions had to be made rapidly and the effects of treatment could be immediately addressed. The two groups disagreed as to who should have major control of health care, on issues of peer review in the office, and on the emphasis physicians should give preventive care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":31052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00001888-198807000-00001\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-198807000-00001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-198807000-00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本研究报告的目的是为了确定在芝加哥医学院洛约拉大学不同课程的毕业生之间的差异。在整个项目中结合了基础科学和临床科学的特殊课程上学习的医生,比普通课程的学生更多地选择了家庭实践和精神病学专业,而且往往是带薪的。参加特殊课程的学生中,有三分之一的人认为,他们在医学院接受培训的最大优势是为独立学习做准备,大多数人认为,在诊断中存在不确定性的做法是可取的。传统项目的毕业生更喜欢处理那些必须迅速做出重要决定和治疗效果可以立即解决的病例。在谁应该主要控制医疗保健、办公室的同行评议问题以及医生应该重视预防保健等问题上,两组人存在分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of graduates of regular curriculum and unified basic-science-clinical curriculum.

The purpose of the study reported here was to identify differences between graduates who were in different curricula at Loyola University of Chicago Stritch School of Medicine. The physicians who had been in the special track, which combined the basic and clinical sciences throughout the program, chose specialties in family practice and psychiatry more than the regular track students and more often were salaried. One-third of those in the special curriculum felt the greatest strength of their medical school training was the preparation for independent learning, and a majority viewed a practice in which there were uncertainties in diagnosis as desirable. The traditional program graduate preferred to deal with cases in which important decisions had to be made rapidly and the effects of treatment could be immediately addressed. The two groups disagreed as to who should have major control of health care, on issues of peer review in the office, and on the emphasis physicians should give preventive care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Examining the Status of Competency-Oriented in Medical Science Education in Iran Designing an Application to Empower Academic Staff Members in the Field of E-Learning Design and Development of Electronic Moulage of Brachial Plexus Muscles to Enhance the Learning of Upper Limb Anatomy: An Interventional Study Applying a Meta-synthesis Approach to Present a Blended Learning Model for Talent Development How to Develop a Memory Game for Clinical Courses: A Leading Approach to the Interaction of Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1