替代毒性测试系统的验证:已吸取的教训和需要吸取的教训。

Molecular toxicology Pub Date : 1987-09-01
M Balls, R Clothier
{"title":"替代毒性测试系统的验证:已吸取的教训和需要吸取的教训。","authors":"M Balls,&nbsp;R Clothier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Validation in the context of in vitro toxicity tests is defined, and various aspects of the validation process are discussed, including the design and conduct of interlaboratory validation schemes; the selection of tests, participating laboratories, and test chemicals; the selection and use of in vivo data; in vivo/in vitro data comparison; the question of \"false\" results; in vitro cytotoxicity as a predictor of actual lethal toxicity; and the validation of alternatives to the Draize eye irritancy tests. It is concluded that a thorough reevaluation of current practice is essential if the promise and potential of nonanimal toxicity tests are to be fully realized and if valid alternative tests acceptable to regulatory agencies are to be developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":77750,"journal":{"name":"Molecular toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of alternative toxicity test systems: lessons learned and to be learned.\",\"authors\":\"M Balls,&nbsp;R Clothier\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Validation in the context of in vitro toxicity tests is defined, and various aspects of the validation process are discussed, including the design and conduct of interlaboratory validation schemes; the selection of tests, participating laboratories, and test chemicals; the selection and use of in vivo data; in vivo/in vitro data comparison; the question of \\\"false\\\" results; in vitro cytotoxicity as a predictor of actual lethal toxicity; and the validation of alternatives to the Draize eye irritancy tests. It is concluded that a thorough reevaluation of current practice is essential if the promise and potential of nonanimal toxicity tests are to be fully realized and if valid alternative tests acceptable to regulatory agencies are to be developed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定义了体外毒性试验背景下的验证,讨论了验证过程的各个方面,包括实验室间验证方案的设计和实施;选择测试、参与实验室和测试化学品;体内数据的选择和使用;体内/体外数据比较;“假”结果的问题;体外细胞毒性作为实际致死毒性的预测因子;以及验证Draize眼睛刺激测试的替代方案。结论是,如果要充分实现非动物毒性试验的希望和潜力,如果要开发监管机构可接受的有效替代试验,就必须对目前的做法进行彻底的重新评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of alternative toxicity test systems: lessons learned and to be learned.

Validation in the context of in vitro toxicity tests is defined, and various aspects of the validation process are discussed, including the design and conduct of interlaboratory validation schemes; the selection of tests, participating laboratories, and test chemicals; the selection and use of in vivo data; in vivo/in vitro data comparison; the question of "false" results; in vitro cytotoxicity as a predictor of actual lethal toxicity; and the validation of alternatives to the Draize eye irritancy tests. It is concluded that a thorough reevaluation of current practice is essential if the promise and potential of nonanimal toxicity tests are to be fully realized and if valid alternative tests acceptable to regulatory agencies are to be developed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Xenobiotic regulation of glutathione S-transferase Ya gene expression. Review: gene amplification--a cellular response to genotoxic stress. Limitations of the fluorescent probe viability assay. Induction of a novel damage-specific DNA binding protein correlates with enhanced DNA repair in primate cells. Induction of a novel damage-specific DNA binding protein correlates with enhanced DNA repair in primate cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1