萘普生与吡洛芬治疗骨关节炎的疗效和耐受性比较。

Pharmatherapeutica Pub Date : 1987-01-01
I Boussina, T L Vischer
{"title":"萘普生与吡洛芬治疗骨关节炎的疗效和耐受性比较。","authors":"I Boussina,&nbsp;T L Vischer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A double-blind, double-dummy study design was used to compare the efficacy and tolerance of naproxen with that of pirprofen in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Sixty patients were assigned randomly to receive either 500 mg naproxen twice daily or 400 mg pirprofen twice daily for 4 weeks. Both groups were similar in all respects except age, which was significantly greater in the naproxen-treated patients than in the pirprofen-treated patients. Both treatments yielded statistically significant improvement in duration of stiffness after inactivity, global pain, pain on full passive movement, pain during a selected activity, and physicians' and patients' assessments of overall arthritic condition. There were no significant differences between the two groups in either the incidence or the severity of adverse effects of the drugs, most of which involved gastro-intestinal disturbances. Both medications were shown to be well tolerated, acceptable, and effective for treating osteoarthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19862,"journal":{"name":"Pharmatherapeutica","volume":"5 1","pages":"16-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and tolerance of naproxen versus pirprofen in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis.\",\"authors\":\"I Boussina,&nbsp;T L Vischer\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A double-blind, double-dummy study design was used to compare the efficacy and tolerance of naproxen with that of pirprofen in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Sixty patients were assigned randomly to receive either 500 mg naproxen twice daily or 400 mg pirprofen twice daily for 4 weeks. Both groups were similar in all respects except age, which was significantly greater in the naproxen-treated patients than in the pirprofen-treated patients. Both treatments yielded statistically significant improvement in duration of stiffness after inactivity, global pain, pain on full passive movement, pain during a selected activity, and physicians' and patients' assessments of overall arthritic condition. There were no significant differences between the two groups in either the incidence or the severity of adverse effects of the drugs, most of which involved gastro-intestinal disturbances. Both medications were shown to be well tolerated, acceptable, and effective for treating osteoarthritis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmatherapeutica\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"16-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmatherapeutica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmatherapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用双盲、双假人研究设计,比较萘普生与吡洛芬治疗骨关节炎的疗效和耐受性。60名患者被随机分配接受500毫克萘普生每日两次或400毫克吡洛芬每日两次,持续4周。两组在所有方面都相似,除了年龄,服用萘普生的患者明显大于服用吡洛芬的患者。两种治疗方法在静止后僵硬的持续时间、全身疼痛、完全被动运动时的疼痛、选定活动时的疼痛以及医生和患者对整体关节炎状况的评估方面都有统计学上的显著改善。两组在药物不良反应的发生率和严重程度上没有显著差异,其中大多数涉及胃肠道紊乱。两种药物均表现出良好的耐受性、可接受性和治疗骨关节炎的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and tolerance of naproxen versus pirprofen in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis.

A double-blind, double-dummy study design was used to compare the efficacy and tolerance of naproxen with that of pirprofen in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Sixty patients were assigned randomly to receive either 500 mg naproxen twice daily or 400 mg pirprofen twice daily for 4 weeks. Both groups were similar in all respects except age, which was significantly greater in the naproxen-treated patients than in the pirprofen-treated patients. Both treatments yielded statistically significant improvement in duration of stiffness after inactivity, global pain, pain on full passive movement, pain during a selected activity, and physicians' and patients' assessments of overall arthritic condition. There were no significant differences between the two groups in either the incidence or the severity of adverse effects of the drugs, most of which involved gastro-intestinal disturbances. Both medications were shown to be well tolerated, acceptable, and effective for treating osteoarthritis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flupenthixol and fluvoxamine in mild to moderate depression: a comparison in general practice. Treatment of chronic occlusive arterial disease with pentoxifylline: changes in clinical and haemodynamic parameters. Effects of penbutolol on plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and antidiuretic hormone levels before and after exercise: a double-blind comparison against placebo. Absence of interaction between ramipril, a new ACE-inhibitor, and phenprocoumon, an anticoagulant agent. Zuclopenthixol and haloperidol/levomepromazine in the treatment of elderly patients with symptoms of aggressiveness and agitation: a double-blind, multi-centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1