确定准备分娩研究的优先事项

Barbara S. Thomas PhD
{"title":"确定准备分娩研究的优先事项","authors":"Barbara S. Thomas PhD","doi":"10.1111/j.1552-6909.1984.tb02190.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Priorities for research on prepared childbirth were identified by means of a statewide Delphi Study. Sample groups of childbirth educators and maternity nurses formulated research topics and set priorities among the topics. Overall, 50 items were specified in four categories: Prenatal Education/Preparation, Labor and Delivery (normal), Postpartum, and Complications. Data were analyzed to identify priorities in each category and to determine the levels of consensus among samples. The need for research on specific areas of prepared childbirth, as perceived by these sample groups, is reported. Although a high level of consensus is apparent, interesting differences emerged.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75963,"journal":{"name":"JOGN nursing; journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing","volume":"13 6","pages":"Pages 400-408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1984.tb02190.x","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Priorities for Prepared Childbirth Research\",\"authors\":\"Barbara S. Thomas PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1552-6909.1984.tb02190.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Priorities for research on prepared childbirth were identified by means of a statewide Delphi Study. Sample groups of childbirth educators and maternity nurses formulated research topics and set priorities among the topics. Overall, 50 items were specified in four categories: Prenatal Education/Preparation, Labor and Delivery (normal), Postpartum, and Complications. Data were analyzed to identify priorities in each category and to determine the levels of consensus among samples. The need for research on specific areas of prepared childbirth, as perceived by these sample groups, is reported. Although a high level of consensus is apparent, interesting differences emerged.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOGN nursing; journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 400-408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1984.tb02190.x\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOGN nursing; journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090031115308851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOGN nursing; journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090031115308851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通过全州德尔菲研究确定了准备分娩研究的优先事项。分娩教育工作者和产科护士的样本组制定了研究主题,并在主题之间确定了优先事项。总共有50个项目,分为四类:产前教育/准备、分娩和分娩(正常)、产后和并发症。对数据进行分析,以确定每个类别中的优先事项,并确定样本之间的共识程度。报告指出,需要对这些抽样组所认为的准备分娩的具体领域进行研究。虽然高度的共识是显而易见的,但有趣的差异也出现了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying Priorities for Prepared Childbirth Research

Priorities for research on prepared childbirth were identified by means of a statewide Delphi Study. Sample groups of childbirth educators and maternity nurses formulated research topics and set priorities among the topics. Overall, 50 items were specified in four categories: Prenatal Education/Preparation, Labor and Delivery (normal), Postpartum, and Complications. Data were analyzed to identify priorities in each category and to determine the levels of consensus among samples. The need for research on specific areas of prepared childbirth, as perceived by these sample groups, is reported. Although a high level of consensus is apparent, interesting differences emerged.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The first trimester. Genetic screening. Guest Editorial Use of Betadine in the Pregnant Woman Identifying Priorities for Prepared Childbirth Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1