患者访谈的准确性和临床工作人员在确定药物依从性方面的估计

Staffan E. Norell
{"title":"患者访谈的准确性和临床工作人员在确定药物依从性方面的估计","authors":"Staffan E. Norell","doi":"10.1016/0271-5384(81)90063-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In research, as well as in daily practice, patient interviews and estimates by clinical staff are used to determine patients' adherence to drug regimens. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of these methods in determining medication compliance among patients treated with pilocarpine to prevent visual loss from glaucoma. This was done by comparisons with objective and detailed information on self-medication behaviour obtained with a recording medication monitor. Results indicated that estimates by clinical staff were not useful in determining medication compliance. Patient interviews indentified 7 out of 16 patients who missed doses at least once a week. However, underreporting of missed doses was a major problem in determining medication compliance by interview. Of 73 patients interviewed, only 4% reported two or more missed doses during the past 7 days, whereas monitor records showed that 33% of the patients missed at least 2 doses, and 16% missed at least 6 doses, during the past week.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79264,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part E, Medical psychology","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 57-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5384(81)90063-6","citationCount":"144","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of patient interviews and estimates by clinical staff in determining medication compliance\",\"authors\":\"Staffan E. Norell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0271-5384(81)90063-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In research, as well as in daily practice, patient interviews and estimates by clinical staff are used to determine patients' adherence to drug regimens. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of these methods in determining medication compliance among patients treated with pilocarpine to prevent visual loss from glaucoma. This was done by comparisons with objective and detailed information on self-medication behaviour obtained with a recording medication monitor. Results indicated that estimates by clinical staff were not useful in determining medication compliance. Patient interviews indentified 7 out of 16 patients who missed doses at least once a week. However, underreporting of missed doses was a major problem in determining medication compliance by interview. Of 73 patients interviewed, only 4% reported two or more missed doses during the past 7 days, whereas monitor records showed that 33% of the patients missed at least 2 doses, and 16% missed at least 6 doses, during the past week.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social science & medicine. Part E, Medical psychology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 57-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-5384(81)90063-6\",\"citationCount\":\"144\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social science & medicine. Part E, Medical psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0271538481900636\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part E, Medical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0271538481900636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 144

摘要

在研究中,以及在日常实践中,患者访谈和临床工作人员的评估被用来确定患者对药物治疗方案的依从性。本研究的目的是评估这些方法在确定接受匹罗卡品治疗以预防青光眼视力丧失的患者用药依从性方面的准确性。这是通过与记录药物监测器获得的自我用药行为的客观和详细信息进行比较来完成的。结果表明,临床工作人员的估计在确定药物依从性方面是无用的。患者访谈确定了16名患者中有7名每周至少错过一次剂量。然而,漏报剂量是通过访谈确定服药依从性的主要问题。在接受采访的73名患者中,只有4%报告在过去7天内错过了两次或两次以上的剂量,而监测记录显示,33%的患者在过去一周内至少错过了2次剂量,16%的患者至少错过了6次剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy of patient interviews and estimates by clinical staff in determining medication compliance

In research, as well as in daily practice, patient interviews and estimates by clinical staff are used to determine patients' adherence to drug regimens. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of these methods in determining medication compliance among patients treated with pilocarpine to prevent visual loss from glaucoma. This was done by comparisons with objective and detailed information on self-medication behaviour obtained with a recording medication monitor. Results indicated that estimates by clinical staff were not useful in determining medication compliance. Patient interviews indentified 7 out of 16 patients who missed doses at least once a week. However, underreporting of missed doses was a major problem in determining medication compliance by interview. Of 73 patients interviewed, only 4% reported two or more missed doses during the past 7 days, whereas monitor records showed that 33% of the patients missed at least 2 doses, and 16% missed at least 6 doses, during the past week.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The interpretation of women's experience: A critical appraisal of the literature on breast cancer Parent talk at intensive care unit rounds Age- and sex-related differences in patterns of drug overdose and abuse Stressful life events, psychological symptoms, and psychosocial adjustment in Anglo, Black, and Cuban elderly The perception of different occupations within the medical profession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1