生物技术中的发明与显而易见性评估。

Australasian biotechnology Pub Date : 1994-09-01

K Finney

{"title":"生物技术中的发明与显而易见性评估。","authors":"K Finney","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the requirements for patentability of an invention is that the invention involves an inventive step or in other words, is not obvious. In recent years, the obviousness of inventions in biotechnology has had to be judicially considered as a consequence of new methodologies being applied in biotechnology. This paper addresses how a research worker might go about assessing whether his or her invention is obvious in the light of developments in this area of patent law.","PeriodicalId":77018,"journal":{"name":"Australasian biotechnology","volume":"4 5","pages":"280-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inventions in biotechnology and the assessment of obviousness.\",\"authors\":\"K Finney\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the requirements for patentability of an invention is that the invention involves an inventive step or in other words, is not obvious. In recent years, the obviousness of inventions in biotechnology has had to be judicially considered as a consequence of new methodologies being applied in biotechnology. This paper addresses how a research worker might go about assessing whether his or her invention is obvious in the light of developments in this area of patent law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":77018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"4 5\",\"pages\":\"280-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

发明可专利性的要求之一是该发明涉及创造性步骤，换句话说，不明显。近年来，由于生物技术中应用了新的方法，必须对生物技术中发明的明显性进行公正的考虑。本文讨论了研究人员如何根据专利法这一领域的发展来评估他或她的发明是否明显。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Inventions in biotechnology and the assessment of obviousness.

One of the requirements for patentability of an invention is that the invention involves an inventive step or in other words, is not obvious. In recent years, the obviousness of inventions in biotechnology has had to be judicially considered as a consequence of new methodologies being applied in biotechnology. This paper addresses how a research worker might go about assessing whether his or her invention is obvious in the light of developments in this area of patent law.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Australasian biotechnology

自引率

0.00%

发文量