同行评议:准备评估者。

S Meredith
{"title":"同行评议:准备评估者。","authors":"S Meredith","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article proposes a different approach to address a key issue within the performance appraisal process: the preparation of Peer Evaluators. The need to regularly assess and verify the clinical expertise of registered nurses has long been recognized. Health care facilities have responded, acknowledging that competency--based evaluation systems can contribute to RN autonomy, accountability, and the refinement of professional standards. The evolution of peer review has expanded the benefits and efficacy of such systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":77058,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of nursing administration","volume":"7 2","pages":"69-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer review: preparing the evaluator.\",\"authors\":\"S Meredith\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article proposes a different approach to address a key issue within the performance appraisal process: the preparation of Peer Evaluators. The need to regularly assess and verify the clinical expertise of registered nurses has long been recognized. Health care facilities have responded, acknowledging that competency--based evaluation systems can contribute to RN autonomy, accountability, and the refinement of professional standards. The evolution of peer review has expanded the benefits and efficacy of such systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of nursing administration\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"69-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of nursing administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of nursing administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种不同的方法来解决绩效考核过程中的一个关键问题:编制同行评价员。长期以来,人们一直认识到有必要定期评估和核实注册护士的临床专业知识。卫生保健机构已经做出了回应,承认基于能力的评估系统可以促进注册护士的自主权、问责制和专业标准的完善。同行评议的发展扩大了这类系统的益处和功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peer review: preparing the evaluator.

This article proposes a different approach to address a key issue within the performance appraisal process: the preparation of Peer Evaluators. The need to regularly assess and verify the clinical expertise of registered nurses has long been recognized. Health care facilities have responded, acknowledging that competency--based evaluation systems can contribute to RN autonomy, accountability, and the refinement of professional standards. The evolution of peer review has expanded the benefits and efficacy of such systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Home care--when will the information age arrive? Perspective: the world, your work and you! Witmer establishes provincial task force to review nursing services. Health care issues: managing services and people in home care: today's challenge. Bridging the gap: medical directives for acute care nurse practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1