[时钟测试:绘制用于检测老年患者认知障碍的时钟]。

Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie Pub Date : 1994-07-01
C Ploenes, S Sharp, M Martin
{"title":"[时钟测试:绘制用于检测老年患者认知障碍的时钟]。","authors":"C Ploenes,&nbsp;S Sharp,&nbsp;M Martin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients of a geriatric hospital (n = 263; 145 women, 118 men) had the task of drawing a clock and indicating a given time by the placements of hands. Errors were classified hierarchically by using a five-category-panel based on defined criteria. Its use as a \"first-line\" screening test for cognitive disorders in old age was evaluated. Retest- (r = 0.89) and interrater- correlations (r = 0.81) were satisfying. The results of this \"clock drawing test\" were compared both to the outcome in the Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) and to the general judgment of the patients' cognitive status, based on the history, the report of informants, on clinical observation and examination. Patients with faultless clock drawings performed well in the AMT. However, prediction of the outcome in the AMT gradually became impossible with poorer performance in the clock drawing test, resulting in a low specificity (0.74) for a normal AMT. Specificity of the clock drawing test increased (0.79) for the general judgment of cognitive disorder, with sensitivity remaining constant (0.84). Sudden onset of cognitive disorder (most commonly confusion) in case of acute disease was discovered by the clock drawing test. Focusing on all patients without apparent cognitive disorder and with normal AMT-result, the subgroup of patients with faultless clock drawings was significantly younger (t = 5.0); p < 0.001). It is suggested to use the clock drawing test in addition to conventional psychometric screening tests because it requires visuospatial skills and conceptual thinking in addition to mere mnestic and verbal qualities.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":76845,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie","volume":"27 4","pages":"246-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The Clock Test: drawing a clock for detection of cognitive disorders in geriatric patients].\",\"authors\":\"C Ploenes,&nbsp;S Sharp,&nbsp;M Martin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients of a geriatric hospital (n = 263; 145 women, 118 men) had the task of drawing a clock and indicating a given time by the placements of hands. Errors were classified hierarchically by using a five-category-panel based on defined criteria. Its use as a \\\"first-line\\\" screening test for cognitive disorders in old age was evaluated. Retest- (r = 0.89) and interrater- correlations (r = 0.81) were satisfying. The results of this \\\"clock drawing test\\\" were compared both to the outcome in the Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) and to the general judgment of the patients' cognitive status, based on the history, the report of informants, on clinical observation and examination. Patients with faultless clock drawings performed well in the AMT. However, prediction of the outcome in the AMT gradually became impossible with poorer performance in the clock drawing test, resulting in a low specificity (0.74) for a normal AMT. Specificity of the clock drawing test increased (0.79) for the general judgment of cognitive disorder, with sensitivity remaining constant (0.84). Sudden onset of cognitive disorder (most commonly confusion) in case of acute disease was discovered by the clock drawing test. Focusing on all patients without apparent cognitive disorder and with normal AMT-result, the subgroup of patients with faultless clock drawings was significantly younger (t = 5.0); p < 0.001). It is suggested to use the clock drawing test in addition to conventional psychometric screening tests because it requires visuospatial skills and conceptual thinking in addition to mere mnestic and verbal qualities.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"246-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年医院的病人(n = 263;145名女性,118名男性)的任务是画一个时钟,并通过手的位置指示给定的时间。通过使用基于定义标准的五类面板对错误进行分层分类。评估了其作为老年认知障碍“一线”筛查试验的用途。复测- (r = 0.89)和间相关性(r = 0.81)令人满意。将“画钟测试”的结果与简略智力测验(AMT)的结果进行比较,并根据病史、举报人的报告、临床观察和检查对患者认知状况的一般判断。时钟图完美的患者在AMT中表现良好。然而,由于时钟绘制测试的性能较差,AMT的结果逐渐无法预测,导致正常AMT的特异性较低(0.74)。时钟绘制试验对认知障碍一般判断的特异性增加(0.79),敏感性保持不变(0.84)。在急性疾病的情况下,通过时钟绘制试验发现了突然发作的认知障碍(最常见的是混乱)。在所有无明显认知障碍且amt结果正常的患者中,时钟图无缺陷的患者亚组明显年轻化(t = 5.0);P < 0.001)。建议在常规的心理测试筛选测试之外使用时钟绘制测试,因为它需要视觉空间技能和概念思维,而不仅仅是记忆和语言素质。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[The Clock Test: drawing a clock for detection of cognitive disorders in geriatric patients].

Patients of a geriatric hospital (n = 263; 145 women, 118 men) had the task of drawing a clock and indicating a given time by the placements of hands. Errors were classified hierarchically by using a five-category-panel based on defined criteria. Its use as a "first-line" screening test for cognitive disorders in old age was evaluated. Retest- (r = 0.89) and interrater- correlations (r = 0.81) were satisfying. The results of this "clock drawing test" were compared both to the outcome in the Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) and to the general judgment of the patients' cognitive status, based on the history, the report of informants, on clinical observation and examination. Patients with faultless clock drawings performed well in the AMT. However, prediction of the outcome in the AMT gradually became impossible with poorer performance in the clock drawing test, resulting in a low specificity (0.74) for a normal AMT. Specificity of the clock drawing test increased (0.79) for the general judgment of cognitive disorder, with sensitivity remaining constant (0.84). Sudden onset of cognitive disorder (most commonly confusion) in case of acute disease was discovered by the clock drawing test. Focusing on all patients without apparent cognitive disorder and with normal AMT-result, the subgroup of patients with faultless clock drawings was significantly younger (t = 5.0); p < 0.001). It is suggested to use the clock drawing test in addition to conventional psychometric screening tests because it requires visuospatial skills and conceptual thinking in addition to mere mnestic and verbal qualities.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Determinants of nursing home admission of elderly patients and chances for prevention. A longitudinal study in Germany]. [Extended family, immediate family and caregiver contacts of 100-year-old patients in Hungary]. [Demography of aging in Spain]. [Assisted living: possibilities, limits and architectural requirements--considerations from the viewpoint of an architect with ecopsychological orientation]. [Suitable housing--experiences of counseling facilities in Austria and Germany].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1