{"title":"面部轮廓形态分析中几种多元统计方法的比较研究。特异性和局限性]。","authors":"R Fenart, D Nazat, R Baillet","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Upon 5 cutaneous angles and 4 bony angles, measured in facial profile, several (mono and plurivariate) methods were used for research of sexual differences. We explain why discriminant analysis is the only one to bring a very significant result.</p>","PeriodicalId":75637,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de l'Association des anatomistes","volume":"78 241","pages":"19-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparative study of several processes of multivariate statistics in the morphologic analysis of the facial profile. Specificity and limits].\",\"authors\":\"R Fenart, D Nazat, R Baillet\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Upon 5 cutaneous angles and 4 bony angles, measured in facial profile, several (mono and plurivariate) methods were used for research of sexual differences. We explain why discriminant analysis is the only one to bring a very significant result.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin de l'Association des anatomistes\",\"volume\":\"78 241\",\"pages\":\"19-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin de l'Association des anatomistes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin de l'Association des anatomistes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Comparative study of several processes of multivariate statistics in the morphologic analysis of the facial profile. Specificity and limits].
Upon 5 cutaneous angles and 4 bony angles, measured in facial profile, several (mono and plurivariate) methods were used for research of sexual differences. We explain why discriminant analysis is the only one to bring a very significant result.