[产房里的父亲——分娩前后的调查]。

M David, H Kentenich
{"title":"[产房里的父亲——分娩前后的调查]。","authors":"M David,&nbsp;H Kentenich","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meanwhile the attendance of fathers in the labour room is common. From 1. 7. 90-15. 10. 91 510 German fathers were interviewed before and 45' after labour. In comparison a smaller number (n = 56) of fathers were questioned who had decided not to attend. The evaluated data was split in the following three categories: 1. pre-post comparison; 2. \"participants\" and \"non-participants\" comparison; 3. special problems. The most mentioned reason for participation (over 85%) was the positive influence on the women. More then 70% of the attendants even wanted to support their wives during complicated delivery and surgical interventions. Approximately 5% of the fathers attending a clinic delivery would then prefer a home delivery because they more or less felt as a substitute to medical personnel. Non participants evidently were anxious due to missing preparation and information about the parturition. Sometimes the women desired no participation of their partners. About 23% of the men decided to attend labour just before birth. Practical recommendations are given and the change in the point of view of the fathers during course of labour is presented in this paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":23919,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Fathers in the labor room--a survey before and after delivery].\",\"authors\":\"M David,&nbsp;H Kentenich\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Meanwhile the attendance of fathers in the labour room is common. From 1. 7. 90-15. 10. 91 510 German fathers were interviewed before and 45' after labour. In comparison a smaller number (n = 56) of fathers were questioned who had decided not to attend. The evaluated data was split in the following three categories: 1. pre-post comparison; 2. \\\"participants\\\" and \\\"non-participants\\\" comparison; 3. special problems. The most mentioned reason for participation (over 85%) was the positive influence on the women. More then 70% of the attendants even wanted to support their wives during complicated delivery and surgical interventions. Approximately 5% of the fathers attending a clinic delivery would then prefer a home delivery because they more or less felt as a substitute to medical personnel. Non participants evidently were anxious due to missing preparation and information about the parturition. Sometimes the women desired no participation of their partners. About 23% of the men decided to attend labour just before birth. Practical recommendations are given and the change in the point of view of the fathers during course of labour is presented in this paper.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与此同时,父亲在产房的陪伴是很常见的。从1。7. 90 - 15所示。10. 9510名德国父亲在分娩前接受了采访,45名在分娩后接受了采访。相比之下,决定不参加的父亲人数较少(n = 56)。评估数据分为以下三类:1。张后比较;2. “参与者”与“非参与者”比较;3.特殊的问题。提到最多的参与原因(超过85%)是对妇女的积极影响。超过70%的陪护人员甚至想在复杂的分娩和手术干预中支持他们的妻子。大约5%参加诊所分娩的父亲更喜欢在家分娩,因为他们或多或少觉得可以代替医务人员。由于缺少准备工作和分娩信息,非参与者明显感到焦虑。有时,女性不希望她们的伴侣参与。约23%的男性决定在出生前参加分娩。本文提出了切实可行的建议,并提出了父亲在分娩过程中观点的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Fathers in the labor room--a survey before and after delivery].

Meanwhile the attendance of fathers in the labour room is common. From 1. 7. 90-15. 10. 91 510 German fathers were interviewed before and 45' after labour. In comparison a smaller number (n = 56) of fathers were questioned who had decided not to attend. The evaluated data was split in the following three categories: 1. pre-post comparison; 2. "participants" and "non-participants" comparison; 3. special problems. The most mentioned reason for participation (over 85%) was the positive influence on the women. More then 70% of the attendants even wanted to support their wives during complicated delivery and surgical interventions. Approximately 5% of the fathers attending a clinic delivery would then prefer a home delivery because they more or less felt as a substitute to medical personnel. Non participants evidently were anxious due to missing preparation and information about the parturition. Sometimes the women desired no participation of their partners. About 23% of the men decided to attend labour just before birth. Practical recommendations are given and the change in the point of view of the fathers during course of labour is presented in this paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Symposium on Uterine Contraction and Beginning of Labor. Aachen, September 1993]. [Uterine contraction and labor onset. Overview]. [Control of labor onset in the human]. [Biochemical principles of cervix ripening and dilatation]. [Role of the cervix uteri at labor onset from ultrasound studies].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1