[盆腔淋巴结切除术:腹腔镜还是剖腹手术?]。

Journal d'urologie Pub Date : 1996-01-01
F Péloquin, F Saad
{"title":"[盆腔淋巴结切除术:腹腔镜还是剖腹手术?]。","authors":"F Péloquin,&nbsp;F Saad","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We analyzed the results of our first 26 laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissections performed in patients with cancer of the prostate and compared our findings with those obtained in a series of 16 laparotomy dissections. The two groups were comparable for plasma serum prostate specific antigen level (21.04 +/- 19 ng/ml vs. 29.3 +/- 12.8; p = 0.15 Student's unpaired t test), clinical stage at rectal examination and pathology stage. There was a significant difference in the number of post-operative days (4.3 +/- 2.45 days vs. 2.29 +/- 1.55 days; p = 0.025 Student's unpaired t test). The number of nodes removed was comparable (p = 0.35 Fischer exact test). Laparoscopic dissection of pelvic nodes is an interesting alternative to open surgery. Postoperative hospitalization is shorter and operative time is acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":77191,"journal":{"name":"Journal d'urologie","volume":"102 1","pages":"28-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Pelvic lymphadenectomy: celioscopy or laparotomy?].\",\"authors\":\"F Péloquin,&nbsp;F Saad\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We analyzed the results of our first 26 laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissections performed in patients with cancer of the prostate and compared our findings with those obtained in a series of 16 laparotomy dissections. The two groups were comparable for plasma serum prostate specific antigen level (21.04 +/- 19 ng/ml vs. 29.3 +/- 12.8; p = 0.15 Student's unpaired t test), clinical stage at rectal examination and pathology stage. There was a significant difference in the number of post-operative days (4.3 +/- 2.45 days vs. 2.29 +/- 1.55 days; p = 0.025 Student's unpaired t test). The number of nodes removed was comparable (p = 0.35 Fischer exact test). Laparoscopic dissection of pelvic nodes is an interesting alternative to open surgery. Postoperative hospitalization is shorter and operative time is acceptable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal d'urologie\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"28-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal d'urologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal d'urologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们分析了前26例前列腺癌患者腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫的结果,并将我们的发现与16例剖腹手术清扫的结果进行了比较。两组血清前列腺特异性抗原水平具有可比性(21.04 +/- 19 ng/ml vs. 29.3 +/- 12.8;p = 0.15 Student's unpaired t检验)、直肠检查的临床分期和病理分期。术后天数差异有统计学意义(4.3 +/- 2.45天vs. 2.29 +/- 1.55天;p = 0.025学生非配对t检验)。切除的淋巴结数量具有可比性(p = 0.35 Fischer精确检验)。腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术是开放手术的一种有趣的替代方法。术后住院时间短,手术时间可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Pelvic lymphadenectomy: celioscopy or laparotomy?].

We analyzed the results of our first 26 laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissections performed in patients with cancer of the prostate and compared our findings with those obtained in a series of 16 laparotomy dissections. The two groups were comparable for plasma serum prostate specific antigen level (21.04 +/- 19 ng/ml vs. 29.3 +/- 12.8; p = 0.15 Student's unpaired t test), clinical stage at rectal examination and pathology stage. There was a significant difference in the number of post-operative days (4.3 +/- 2.45 days vs. 2.29 +/- 1.55 days; p = 0.025 Student's unpaired t test). The number of nodes removed was comparable (p = 0.35 Fischer exact test). Laparoscopic dissection of pelvic nodes is an interesting alternative to open surgery. Postoperative hospitalization is shorter and operative time is acceptable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Premature ejaculation]. [Bilateral testicular metastasis of cancer of the prostate]. [Spermatocytic seminoma. Apropos of a case and review of the literature]. [Urachal remnants: excision or surveillance? Apropos of 3 cases and review of the literature]. [Nephrectomy for cancer in pregnant women. Apropos of a case].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1