{"title":"临床实践指南:质量改进工具与法律规范。","authors":"C G Wise, J E Billi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of clinical guidelines in malpractice litigation has been controversial. The primary purpose of guidelines as a quality improvement tool must be sustained, and applications of guidelines beyond this purpose must be done carefully, with full recognition of inherent limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":79476,"journal":{"name":"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application","volume":"1 4","pages":"212-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical practice guidelines: quality improvement tools versus legal norms.\",\"authors\":\"C G Wise, J E Billi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The role of clinical guidelines in malpractice litigation has been controversial. The primary purpose of guidelines as a quality improvement tool must be sustained, and applications of guidelines beyond this purpose must be done carefully, with full recognition of inherent limitations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"212-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical practice guidelines: quality improvement tools versus legal norms.
The role of clinical guidelines in malpractice litigation has been controversial. The primary purpose of guidelines as a quality improvement tool must be sustained, and applications of guidelines beyond this purpose must be done carefully, with full recognition of inherent limitations.
分享
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
