基于模型的生育和避孕效果研究方法。

C R Weinberg, H Zhou
{"title":"基于模型的生育和避孕效果研究方法。","authors":"C R Weinberg,&nbsp;H Zhou","doi":"10.1023/a:1006531316675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Statistical methods recently developed to aid in identifying environmental exposures with reproductive toxicity can also be applied to trials of interventions undertaken specifically to impair fertility, i.e. methods of contraception. Although only applicable in a trial that includes a reliable benchmark for identifying the day of ovulation, the proposed measures of contraceptive efficacy derived from such a trial offer certain interpretive advantages over the more traditional approaches of evaluating contraceptives. Extensions of the same models also allow one to evaluate efficacy under any assumed pattern of imperfect use. One can also evaluate methods based on biomarkers for the fertile phase of the cycle, such as hydration of the cervical mucus, that may prove to be enormously helpful to couples who wish to use periodic abstinence as their method. In prospective studies of fertility, couples who occasionally use a barrier method should not be excluded from the study, but can be retained, without biasing the estimates for fertility parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":76977,"journal":{"name":"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception","volume":"13 2-3","pages":"97-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1006531316675","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model-based approaches to studying fertility and contraceptive efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"C R Weinberg,&nbsp;H Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1023/a:1006531316675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Statistical methods recently developed to aid in identifying environmental exposures with reproductive toxicity can also be applied to trials of interventions undertaken specifically to impair fertility, i.e. methods of contraception. Although only applicable in a trial that includes a reliable benchmark for identifying the day of ovulation, the proposed measures of contraceptive efficacy derived from such a trial offer certain interpretive advantages over the more traditional approaches of evaluating contraceptives. Extensions of the same models also allow one to evaluate efficacy under any assumed pattern of imperfect use. One can also evaluate methods based on biomarkers for the fertile phase of the cycle, such as hydration of the cervical mucus, that may prove to be enormously helpful to couples who wish to use periodic abstinence as their method. In prospective studies of fertility, couples who occasionally use a barrier method should not be excluded from the study, but can be retained, without biasing the estimates for fertility parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception\",\"volume\":\"13 2-3\",\"pages\":\"97-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/a:1006531316675\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006531316675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006531316675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

最近发展的统计方法有助于查明具有生殖毒性的环境暴露,也可应用于专门为损害生育力而采取的干预措施的试验,即避孕方法。虽然只适用于包括确定排卵日期的可靠基准的试验,但从这种试验中得出的避孕效果的拟议措施比评估避孕药具的更传统方法具有某些解释上的优势。同一模型的扩展也允许人们在任何假设的不完美使用模式下评估功效。人们也可以评估基于生理周期可生育阶段的生物标志物的方法,比如宫颈粘液的水合作用,这可能对那些希望使用周期性禁欲作为方法的夫妇非常有帮助。在生育的前瞻性研究中,偶尔使用屏障方法的夫妇不应被排除在研究之外,但可以保留,而不会使生育参数的估计产生偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Model-based approaches to studying fertility and contraceptive efficacy.

Statistical methods recently developed to aid in identifying environmental exposures with reproductive toxicity can also be applied to trials of interventions undertaken specifically to impair fertility, i.e. methods of contraception. Although only applicable in a trial that includes a reliable benchmark for identifying the day of ovulation, the proposed measures of contraceptive efficacy derived from such a trial offer certain interpretive advantages over the more traditional approaches of evaluating contraceptives. Extensions of the same models also allow one to evaluate efficacy under any assumed pattern of imperfect use. One can also evaluate methods based on biomarkers for the fertile phase of the cycle, such as hydration of the cervical mucus, that may prove to be enormously helpful to couples who wish to use periodic abstinence as their method. In prospective studies of fertility, couples who occasionally use a barrier method should not be excluded from the study, but can be retained, without biasing the estimates for fertility parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nota editorial Workshop papers Free communications 1 Free communications 2 Free communications 3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1