大鼠在主动和被动听觉怪异范式中的事件相关电位

T Shinba
{"title":"大鼠在主动和被动听觉怪异范式中的事件相关电位","authors":"T Shinba","doi":"10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00047-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Event-related potentials (ERPs) of the rat were recorded at the frontal, temporal and parietal areas on the skull during active and passive auditory oddball paradigms, and consisted of P1 (12.7–37.7 ms), N1 (40.0–80.6 ms), P2 (91.7–202.7 ms), N2 (183.7–246.7 ms) and P3 (265.7–462.7 ms) components. Topography and relationship to the paradigm and stimulus types were examined, and unique features were found for each component. P1, N1 and N2 were prominent frontally. However, P2 showed maximum amplitude at the parietal area. N2 and P3 were consistently present only for rare stimuli. During the passive paradigm P3 had a tendency to be greater at the parietal area, but during the active paradigm it had a longer latency and a larger amplitude than during the passive paradigm. No significant difference between the recording sites was observed for P3 latency and amplitude during the active paradigm. The relationship to the paradigm and stimulus types indicates that the rat P3 corresponds to that of the human. There are differences, however, in surface distribution of the ERP components between the rat and the human. The topographical characteristics of the rat ERP, which are possibly due to differences in brain architecture and function, should be taken into consideration when the rat is used for ERP research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100401,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","volume":"104 5","pages":"Pages 447-452"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00047-6","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Event-related potentials of the rat during active and passive auditory oddball paradigms\",\"authors\":\"T Shinba\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00047-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Event-related potentials (ERPs) of the rat were recorded at the frontal, temporal and parietal areas on the skull during active and passive auditory oddball paradigms, and consisted of P1 (12.7–37.7 ms), N1 (40.0–80.6 ms), P2 (91.7–202.7 ms), N2 (183.7–246.7 ms) and P3 (265.7–462.7 ms) components. Topography and relationship to the paradigm and stimulus types were examined, and unique features were found for each component. P1, N1 and N2 were prominent frontally. However, P2 showed maximum amplitude at the parietal area. N2 and P3 were consistently present only for rare stimuli. During the passive paradigm P3 had a tendency to be greater at the parietal area, but during the active paradigm it had a longer latency and a larger amplitude than during the passive paradigm. No significant difference between the recording sites was observed for P3 latency and amplitude during the active paradigm. The relationship to the paradigm and stimulus types indicates that the rat P3 corresponds to that of the human. There are differences, however, in surface distribution of the ERP components between the rat and the human. The topographical characteristics of the rat ERP, which are possibly due to differences in brain architecture and function, should be taken into consideration when the rat is used for ERP research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section\",\"volume\":\"104 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 447-452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00047-6\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559797000476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559797000476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

在主动式和被动式听怪球模式下,记录大鼠颅骨额叶、颞叶和顶叶的事件相关电位(event -相关电位,ERPs),由P1 (12.7 ~ 37.7 ms)、N1 (40.0 ~ 80.6 ms)、P2 (91.7 ~ 202.7 ms)、N2 (183.7 ~ 246.7 ms)和P3 (265.7 ~ 462.7 ms)组成。研究了地形和与范式和刺激类型的关系,并发现了每个成分的独特特征。P1、N1和N2在正面较为突出。而P2在顶叶区振幅最大。N2和P3仅在罕见刺激下持续存在。在被动模式下,P3在顶叶区有更大的趋势,但在主动模式下,它比被动模式有更长的潜伏期和更大的振幅。在活动模式下,记录部位之间P3潜伏期和振幅无显著差异。与范式和刺激类型的关系表明,大鼠的P3与人类的P3相对应。然而,在大鼠和人类之间,ERP成分的表面分布存在差异。利用大鼠进行ERP研究时,应考虑到大鼠ERP的地形特征,这些特征可能是由于大脑结构和功能的差异造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Event-related potentials of the rat during active and passive auditory oddball paradigms

Event-related potentials (ERPs) of the rat were recorded at the frontal, temporal and parietal areas on the skull during active and passive auditory oddball paradigms, and consisted of P1 (12.7–37.7 ms), N1 (40.0–80.6 ms), P2 (91.7–202.7 ms), N2 (183.7–246.7 ms) and P3 (265.7–462.7 ms) components. Topography and relationship to the paradigm and stimulus types were examined, and unique features were found for each component. P1, N1 and N2 were prominent frontally. However, P2 showed maximum amplitude at the parietal area. N2 and P3 were consistently present only for rare stimuli. During the passive paradigm P3 had a tendency to be greater at the parietal area, but during the active paradigm it had a longer latency and a larger amplitude than during the passive paradigm. No significant difference between the recording sites was observed for P3 latency and amplitude during the active paradigm. The relationship to the paradigm and stimulus types indicates that the rat P3 corresponds to that of the human. There are differences, however, in surface distribution of the ERP components between the rat and the human. The topographical characteristics of the rat ERP, which are possibly due to differences in brain architecture and function, should be taken into consideration when the rat is used for ERP research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual Evoked Potentials Clinical Evoked Potentials: An Illustrated Manual Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Motor Evoked Potentials Cochlear implant performance and electrically-evoked auditory brain-stem response characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1