[精神病学中隔离的使用——一项文献研究]。

Verpleegkunde Pub Date : 1997-02-01
B Lendemeijer
{"title":"[精神病学中隔离的使用——一项文献研究]。","authors":"B Lendemeijer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reports on a literature review into the publications on the practise of seclusion. Attention will be paid to the moral debate on seclusion. The major part of the publications consider seclusion as a necessary intervention to manage problem behaviour. The first part of the article will consider definitional aspects and will result in concept clarification. The review shows differences at definitional aspects, motives for seclusion and patient characteristics. Data on frequencies, incidence and duration appear to be different. The experience of patients who are secluded are mostly negative, but positive reactions are also reported. Publications on the influence of the hospital characteristics to the use of seclusion seem to increase during time. Finally it is concluded that seclusion is an effective way to manage (potential) dangerous behaviour and that seclusion is an intervention which may create therapeutic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":79427,"journal":{"name":"Verpleegkunde","volume":"12 1","pages":"15-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The use of isolation in psychiatry--a literature study].\",\"authors\":\"B Lendemeijer\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article reports on a literature review into the publications on the practise of seclusion. Attention will be paid to the moral debate on seclusion. The major part of the publications consider seclusion as a necessary intervention to manage problem behaviour. The first part of the article will consider definitional aspects and will result in concept clarification. The review shows differences at definitional aspects, motives for seclusion and patient characteristics. Data on frequencies, incidence and duration appear to be different. The experience of patients who are secluded are mostly negative, but positive reactions are also reported. Publications on the influence of the hospital characteristics to the use of seclusion seem to increase during time. Finally it is concluded that seclusion is an effective way to manage (potential) dangerous behaviour and that seclusion is an intervention which may create therapeutic conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Verpleegkunde\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"15-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Verpleegkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verpleegkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对有关隐居实践的出版物进行了文献综述。将关注关于隐居的道德辩论。出版物的主要部分认为隔离是管理问题行为的必要干预措施。文章的第一部分将考虑定义方面,并将导致概念澄清。回顾显示在定义方面的差异,隔离的动机和患者的特点。关于频率、发病率和持续时间的数据似乎有所不同。被隔离的患者的经历大多是消极的,但也有积极的反应。随着时间的推移,关于医院特点对隔离使用影响的出版物似乎越来越多。最后得出结论,隔离是管理(潜在)危险行为的有效方法,隔离是一种可能创造治疗条件的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[The use of isolation in psychiatry--a literature study].

This article reports on a literature review into the publications on the practise of seclusion. Attention will be paid to the moral debate on seclusion. The major part of the publications consider seclusion as a necessary intervention to manage problem behaviour. The first part of the article will consider definitional aspects and will result in concept clarification. The review shows differences at definitional aspects, motives for seclusion and patient characteristics. Data on frequencies, incidence and duration appear to be different. The experience of patients who are secluded are mostly negative, but positive reactions are also reported. Publications on the influence of the hospital characteristics to the use of seclusion seem to increase during time. Finally it is concluded that seclusion is an effective way to manage (potential) dangerous behaviour and that seclusion is an intervention which may create therapeutic conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Functiedifferentiatie: een kader voor professionele groei of onbedoeld hiërarchisch denken? G-COMAN: de nurse-led implementatie van geriatrisch-chirurgisch co-management in UZ Leuven Digitale ondersteuning voor zelfmanagement en betekenisvolle activiteiten voor mensen met beginnende dementie. Waar visie ontbreekt, verkwijnt het vak. Aandacht gevraagd voor zingeving in de zorg Proud to be a nurse?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1