无创血压测定的重测信度和收敛效度:臂血压计与Peñaz-method。

J Kugler, J Rollnik, N Schmitz
{"title":"无创血压测定的重测信度和收敛效度:臂血压计与Peñaz-method。","authors":"J Kugler,&nbsp;J Rollnik,&nbsp;N Schmitz","doi":"10.1007/BF03356570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blood pressure is usually determined by arm sphygmomanometry. However, this technique does not allow continuous blood pressure monitoring. Over the last years, a technique introduced by Peñaz makes it feasible to determine blood pressure noninvasively and continuously from the finger artery. Study on 46 normotensives showed that both methods have high retest-reliabilities for systolic blood pressure while for diastolic blood pressure, arm sphygmomanometry resulted in lower reliabilities than the Peñaz-method. Between-method-comparisons showed only small correlations. Diastolic blood pressure levels were significantly lower in the Peñaz-method than in arm sphygmomanometry. In conclusion, blood pressure levels determined by arm sphygmomanometry and the Peñaz-method differ systematically because of different methodologies. If blood pressure or blood pressure changes are determined, the method and the circumstances of its application need to be carefully reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":77181,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","volume":"14 4","pages":"251-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03356570","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retest-reliability and convergent validity of noninvasive blood pressure determination: arm sphygmomanometry vs. Peñaz-method.\",\"authors\":\"J Kugler,&nbsp;J Rollnik,&nbsp;N Schmitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF03356570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Blood pressure is usually determined by arm sphygmomanometry. However, this technique does not allow continuous blood pressure monitoring. Over the last years, a technique introduced by Peñaz makes it feasible to determine blood pressure noninvasively and continuously from the finger artery. Study on 46 normotensives showed that both methods have high retest-reliabilities for systolic blood pressure while for diastolic blood pressure, arm sphygmomanometry resulted in lower reliabilities than the Peñaz-method. Between-method-comparisons showed only small correlations. Diastolic blood pressure levels were significantly lower in the Peñaz-method than in arm sphygmomanometry. In conclusion, blood pressure levels determined by arm sphygmomanometry and the Peñaz-method differ systematically because of different methodologies. If blood pressure or blood pressure changes are determined, the method and the circumstances of its application need to be carefully reported.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"251-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03356570\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

血压通常由手臂血压计测定。然而,这种技术不允许持续的血压监测。在过去的几年里,Peñaz引入的一项技术使得通过手指动脉无创地连续测定血压成为可能。对46个正常血压的研究表明,两种方法对收缩压的再测信度都很高,而对舒张压,手臂血压计的再测信度低于Peñaz-method。方法间比较只显示出很小的相关性。Peñaz-method的舒张压水平明显低于手臂血压计。总之,由于方法不同,手臂血压计和Peñaz-method测定的血压水平存在系统性差异。如果测定血压或血压变化,则需要仔细报告其应用的方法和情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retest-reliability and convergent validity of noninvasive blood pressure determination: arm sphygmomanometry vs. Peñaz-method.

Blood pressure is usually determined by arm sphygmomanometry. However, this technique does not allow continuous blood pressure monitoring. Over the last years, a technique introduced by Peñaz makes it feasible to determine blood pressure noninvasively and continuously from the finger artery. Study on 46 normotensives showed that both methods have high retest-reliabilities for systolic blood pressure while for diastolic blood pressure, arm sphygmomanometry resulted in lower reliabilities than the Peñaz-method. Between-method-comparisons showed only small correlations. Diastolic blood pressure levels were significantly lower in the Peñaz-method than in arm sphygmomanometry. In conclusion, blood pressure levels determined by arm sphygmomanometry and the Peñaz-method differ systematically because of different methodologies. If blood pressure or blood pressure changes are determined, the method and the circumstances of its application need to be carefully reported.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WCALive: broadcasting a major medical conference on the Internet. The inspiratory to end-tidal oxygen difference during exercise. Design and implementation of a PC-based data acquisition system for measuring ECG and respiratory signals. Auscultation revisited: the waveform and spectral characteristics of breath sounds during general anesthesia. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia during anaesthesia: assessment of respiration related beat-to-beat heart rate variability analysis methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1