手臂定位运动再现的横向差异:心理过程层面假说的检验。

M Yamauchi, K Imanaka, M Nakayama, J Matsunaga
{"title":"手臂定位运动再现的横向差异:心理过程层面假说的检验。","authors":"M Yamauchi,&nbsp;K Imanaka,&nbsp;M Nakayama,&nbsp;J Matsunaga","doi":"10.2114/jpa.17.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to determine whether the hypothesis on the levels of psychological processes (Hatta, 1977, 1978) accounts for lateral differences in arm positioning movement (a spatial localization task). Fifteen right-handed male subjects were asked to perform a constrained criterion movement, 12 cm in length, with the left or right arm. Then, after a 10-sec retention interval, they were asked to perform the movement with the same arm, estimating lengths of 6, 12 or 24 cm. Different levels of psychological processes were assumed to be involved in estimating these various movement lengths--half, the same, or double that of the original. All possible combinations of the arm (left/right) and three movement length were tested. The CE scores were lower (more accurate) for the left arm (half; 1.5 +/- 8.1 mm, same; 4.3 +/- 6.2mm, double; 5.9 +/- 20.3 mm) than those for the right arm (half; 5.9 +/- 7.6 mm, same; 10.6 +/- 10.6 mm, double; 11.8 +/- 23.6 mm) in all conditions, indicating a lateral difference (the right hemisphere dominance) in arm positioning tasks. This typical lateral difference, which displayed no significant difference among conditions, is supposed to be mediated by complex or high-level psychological processes. These psychological processes are required by the subjects in the estimation of the various movement lengths. This study suggests that the level of psychological processes is a crucial factor in the manifestation of lateral differences in the performance of arm positioning movements.</p>","PeriodicalId":79317,"journal":{"name":"Applied human science : journal of physiological anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2114/jpa.17.41","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lateral difference in the reproduction of arm positioning movement: an examination of the hypothesis on the levels of psychological processes.\",\"authors\":\"M Yamauchi,&nbsp;K Imanaka,&nbsp;M Nakayama,&nbsp;J Matsunaga\",\"doi\":\"10.2114/jpa.17.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to determine whether the hypothesis on the levels of psychological processes (Hatta, 1977, 1978) accounts for lateral differences in arm positioning movement (a spatial localization task). Fifteen right-handed male subjects were asked to perform a constrained criterion movement, 12 cm in length, with the left or right arm. Then, after a 10-sec retention interval, they were asked to perform the movement with the same arm, estimating lengths of 6, 12 or 24 cm. Different levels of psychological processes were assumed to be involved in estimating these various movement lengths--half, the same, or double that of the original. All possible combinations of the arm (left/right) and three movement length were tested. The CE scores were lower (more accurate) for the left arm (half; 1.5 +/- 8.1 mm, same; 4.3 +/- 6.2mm, double; 5.9 +/- 20.3 mm) than those for the right arm (half; 5.9 +/- 7.6 mm, same; 10.6 +/- 10.6 mm, double; 11.8 +/- 23.6 mm) in all conditions, indicating a lateral difference (the right hemisphere dominance) in arm positioning tasks. This typical lateral difference, which displayed no significant difference among conditions, is supposed to be mediated by complex or high-level psychological processes. These psychological processes are required by the subjects in the estimation of the various movement lengths. This study suggests that the level of psychological processes is a crucial factor in the manifestation of lateral differences in the performance of arm positioning movements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied human science : journal of physiological anthropology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2114/jpa.17.41\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied human science : journal of physiological anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa.17.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied human science : journal of physiological anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa.17.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的目的是确定关于心理过程水平的假设(Hatta, 1977,1978)是否解释了手臂定位运动(一项空间定位任务)的横向差异。15名右撇子男性受试者被要求用左臂或右臂做一个长度为12厘米的受限标准运动。然后,在10秒的保持间隔后,他们被要求用同样的手臂做这个动作,估计长度为6、12或24厘米。在估计这些不同的运动长度时,假定涉及不同程度的心理过程——是原来的一半、相同或两倍。测试了所有可能的手臂组合(左/右)和三种运动长度。左臂的CE分数较低(更准确)(一半;1.5 +/- 8.1 mm,相同;4.3 +/- 6.2mm,双管;5.9 +/- 20.3 mm)比右臂(一半;5.9 +/- 7.6 mm,相同;10.6 +/- 10.6毫米,双瓣;11.8 +/- 23.6 mm),表明在手臂定位任务中存在侧向差异(右半球优势)。这种典型的横向差异,在不同的条件下没有显著的差异,被认为是由复杂的或高级的心理过程介导的。这些心理过程是被试在估计不同运动长度时所需要的。本研究表明,心理过程的水平是手臂定位运动表现横向差异的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lateral difference in the reproduction of arm positioning movement: an examination of the hypothesis on the levels of psychological processes.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the hypothesis on the levels of psychological processes (Hatta, 1977, 1978) accounts for lateral differences in arm positioning movement (a spatial localization task). Fifteen right-handed male subjects were asked to perform a constrained criterion movement, 12 cm in length, with the left or right arm. Then, after a 10-sec retention interval, they were asked to perform the movement with the same arm, estimating lengths of 6, 12 or 24 cm. Different levels of psychological processes were assumed to be involved in estimating these various movement lengths--half, the same, or double that of the original. All possible combinations of the arm (left/right) and three movement length were tested. The CE scores were lower (more accurate) for the left arm (half; 1.5 +/- 8.1 mm, same; 4.3 +/- 6.2mm, double; 5.9 +/- 20.3 mm) than those for the right arm (half; 5.9 +/- 7.6 mm, same; 10.6 +/- 10.6 mm, double; 11.8 +/- 23.6 mm) in all conditions, indicating a lateral difference (the right hemisphere dominance) in arm positioning tasks. This typical lateral difference, which displayed no significant difference among conditions, is supposed to be mediated by complex or high-level psychological processes. These psychological processes are required by the subjects in the estimation of the various movement lengths. This study suggests that the level of psychological processes is a crucial factor in the manifestation of lateral differences in the performance of arm positioning movements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceived, actual, and seasonal changes in the shape of the face, hands and legs. Blood pressure and hormonal responses to short whole body cold exposure in subjects with high dietary salt intake. Changes in physical characteristics and performance of elite sailors following introduction of a sport science programme prior to the 1996 olympic games. Analysis of heart rate variability during mental task with reference to ambient temperature. Effects of mental task on heart rate variability during graded head-up tilt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1