远程保健项目中社区和提供者需求评估的定性方法。

H B Siden
{"title":"远程保健项目中社区和提供者需求评估的定性方法。","authors":"H B Siden","doi":"10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Needs assessment is a critical part of the design and implementation of telehealth projects. This study assessed the need for a telehealth link between a local community and a tertiary-care medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The assessment was conducted using multiple focus groups in a remote community and at a tertiary-care pediatric and women's medical center. Participants were physicians and allied health professionals at both sites and the parents of pediatric patients. Data were analyzed for comment categories and thematic items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The focus groups revealed a number of important positive and negative attitudes regarding telehealth and priorities for implementation. Uncertainty and trust were two themes that emerged from all groups. The resulting design of the telehealth program incorporated these responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Qualitative methods, including focus groups, can yield useful data on complex behavior and explore attitudes toward new and unfamiliar technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":79734,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":"4 3","pages":"225-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.225","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A qualitative approach to community and provider needs assessment in a telehealth project.\",\"authors\":\"H B Siden\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Needs assessment is a critical part of the design and implementation of telehealth projects. This study assessed the need for a telehealth link between a local community and a tertiary-care medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The assessment was conducted using multiple focus groups in a remote community and at a tertiary-care pediatric and women's medical center. Participants were physicians and allied health professionals at both sites and the parents of pediatric patients. Data were analyzed for comment categories and thematic items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The focus groups revealed a number of important positive and negative attitudes regarding telehealth and priorities for implementation. Uncertainty and trust were two themes that emerged from all groups. The resulting design of the telehealth program incorporated these responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Qualitative methods, including focus groups, can yield useful data on complex behavior and explore attitudes toward new and unfamiliar technology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"225-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.225\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

目标:需求评估是设计和实施远程保健项目的关键部分。本研究评估了在地方社区和三级保健医疗中心之间建立远程保健联系的必要性。方法:在一个偏远社区和一个三级护理儿科和妇女医疗中心使用多个焦点小组进行评估。参与者是两个地点的医生和专职卫生专业人员以及儿科患者的父母。分析了评论类别和专题项目的数据。结果:焦点小组揭示了关于远程保健和实施优先事项的一些重要的积极和消极态度。不确定性和信任是所有群体中出现的两个主题。最终的远程医疗方案设计纳入了这些回应。结论:定性方法,包括焦点小组,可以产生复杂行为的有用数据,并探索对新技术和不熟悉技术的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A qualitative approach to community and provider needs assessment in a telehealth project.

Objective: Needs assessment is a critical part of the design and implementation of telehealth projects. This study assessed the need for a telehealth link between a local community and a tertiary-care medical center.

Methods: The assessment was conducted using multiple focus groups in a remote community and at a tertiary-care pediatric and women's medical center. Participants were physicians and allied health professionals at both sites and the parents of pediatric patients. Data were analyzed for comment categories and thematic items.

Results: The focus groups revealed a number of important positive and negative attitudes regarding telehealth and priorities for implementation. Uncertainty and trust were two themes that emerged from all groups. The resulting design of the telehealth program incorporated these responses.

Conclusion: Qualitative methods, including focus groups, can yield useful data on complex behavior and explore attitudes toward new and unfamiliar technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Additional Abstract from the American Telemedicine Association's Fifth Annual Meeting May 21-24, 2000, Phoenix, Arizona. Behavioral Telemedicine: A New Approach to the Continuous Nonintrusive Monitoring of Activities of Daily Living Specialist–Primary Care Provider–Patient Communication in Telemedical Consultations Editorial: Telemedicine Nomenclature: What Does It Mean? Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1