死亡损害赔偿之诉:法律发展。

D H Miller
{"title":"死亡损害赔偿之诉:法律发展。","authors":"D H Miller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This note traces the history of the \"right-to-die\" damage action. These are cases in which health care providers have been sued for providing unwanted life-sustaining treatment. After briefly describing the development of basic right-to-die law, the principle theories behind damage claims and the cases themselves are discussed, and the primary stumbling blocks are analyzed.</p>","PeriodicalId":79729,"journal":{"name":"Specialty law digest. Health care (Monthly)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law.\",\"authors\":\"D H Miller\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This note traces the history of the \\\"right-to-die\\\" damage action. These are cases in which health care providers have been sued for providing unwanted life-sustaining treatment. After briefly describing the development of basic right-to-die law, the principle theories behind damage claims and the cases themselves are discussed, and the primary stumbling blocks are analyzed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Specialty law digest. Health care (Monthly)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Specialty law digest. Health care (Monthly)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Specialty law digest. Health care (Monthly)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇笔记追溯了“死亡权利”损害诉讼的历史。在这些案件中,卫生保健提供者因提供不必要的维持生命治疗而被起诉。在简要描述了基本死亡权利法的发展之后,讨论了损害赔偿要求背后的主要理论和案例本身,并分析了主要障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law.

This note traces the history of the "right-to-die" damage action. These are cases in which health care providers have been sued for providing unwanted life-sustaining treatment. After briefly describing the development of basic right-to-die law, the principle theories behind damage claims and the cases themselves are discussed, and the primary stumbling blocks are analyzed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Of suicide machines, euthanasia legislation, and the health care crisis. The Pharmaceutical Access and Prudent Purchasing Act of 1990: Federal law shifts the duty to warn from the physician to the pharmacist. A competitive analysis of most favored nations clauses in contracts between health care providers and insurers. Hospital medical staff privilege issues: "brother's keeper" revisited. A cost containment malpractice defense: implications for the standard of care and for indigent patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1