临床针对性的医疗记录审查。

Topics in health record management Pub Date : 1991-08-01

K S Lewis

{"title":"临床针对性的医疗记录审查。","authors":"K S Lewis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This clinical pertinence review process described was in effect for seven months, after which the author terminated affiliation with the hospital. Despite resistance by many physicians, this monthly review process focused the medical staff's attention on good documentation practices. To the author's knowledge, the plan is still in use.","PeriodicalId":79757,"journal":{"name":"Topics in health record management","volume":"12 1","pages":"52-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical record review for clinical pertinence.\",\"authors\":\"K S Lewis\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This clinical pertinence review process described was in effect for seven months, after which the author terminated affiliation with the hospital. Despite resistance by many physicians, this monthly review process focused the medical staff's attention on good documentation practices. To the author's knowledge, the plan is still in use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in health record management\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"52-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in health record management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in health record management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

所描述的临床相关性审查过程持续了七个月，之后作者终止了与医院的合作关系。尽管受到许多医生的抵制，这个每月审查过程还是将医务人员的注意力集中在良好的文件规范上。据作者所知，该计划仍在使用中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Medical record review for clinical pertinence.

This clinical pertinence review process described was in effect for seven months, after which the author terminated affiliation with the hospital. Despite resistance by many physicians, this monthly review process focused the medical staff's attention on good documentation practices. To the author's knowledge, the plan is still in use.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Topics in health record management

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Quality improvement techniques. Voice-activated reporting systems: an innovative technology. Research review: differentiation of roles and functions of medical record practitioners. Techniques for dataset design: a utilization management system model. Legal review: the medical records implications of state and federal anti-dumping provisions.