医疗改革中的伦理问题:专家与公众的比较。

J Summers
{"title":"医疗改革中的伦理问题:专家与公众的比较。","authors":"J Summers","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Those of us in the healthcare industry have done a good job in demonstrating the value of our services in relationship to other activities government might undertake. We have done less well in recognizing the demands of individuals to make decisions about their own lives and the healthcare benefits they want. We continue to believe we know best, even to the point that we distrust the public to make appropriate decisions on their own behalf. A major part of freedom is the opportunity to learn from mistakes. When professionals restrict our freedom to choose, we all lose important rights. As the various bills make their way through Congress, we should look beyond our healthcare blinders and see that the public will reject industry-driven plans with almost the same level of suspicion given to the government and business.</p>","PeriodicalId":79670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthcare materiel management","volume":"12 5","pages":"46, 48, 50 passim"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical issues in healthcare reform: the experts and the public compared.\",\"authors\":\"J Summers\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Those of us in the healthcare industry have done a good job in demonstrating the value of our services in relationship to other activities government might undertake. We have done less well in recognizing the demands of individuals to make decisions about their own lives and the healthcare benefits they want. We continue to believe we know best, even to the point that we distrust the public to make appropriate decisions on their own behalf. A major part of freedom is the opportunity to learn from mistakes. When professionals restrict our freedom to choose, we all lose important rights. As the various bills make their way through Congress, we should look beyond our healthcare blinders and see that the public will reject industry-driven plans with almost the same level of suspicion given to the government and business.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of healthcare materiel management\",\"volume\":\"12 5\",\"pages\":\"46, 48, 50 passim\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of healthcare materiel management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthcare materiel management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们这些医疗保健行业的人在展示我们的服务与政府可能承担的其他活动的价值方面做得很好。在认识到个人对自己的生活和他们想要的医疗福利做出决定的需求方面,我们做得不够好。我们仍然认为我们最了解情况,甚至到了我们不信任公众为自己做出适当决定的地步。自由的一个主要部分是从错误中学习的机会。当专业人士限制我们的选择自由时,我们都失去了重要的权利。随着各种法案在国会获得通过,我们应该超越我们的医疗保健眼罩,看到公众将以与对政府和企业几乎相同的怀疑程度拒绝行业驱动的计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethical issues in healthcare reform: the experts and the public compared.

Those of us in the healthcare industry have done a good job in demonstrating the value of our services in relationship to other activities government might undertake. We have done less well in recognizing the demands of individuals to make decisions about their own lives and the healthcare benefits they want. We continue to believe we know best, even to the point that we distrust the public to make appropriate decisions on their own behalf. A major part of freedom is the opportunity to learn from mistakes. When professionals restrict our freedom to choose, we all lose important rights. As the various bills make their way through Congress, we should look beyond our healthcare blinders and see that the public will reject industry-driven plans with almost the same level of suspicion given to the government and business.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Team Building Ozone Sterilization Catheters Disaster preparedness. Directory of resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1