医师对家庭诊所中临床药学遭遇的看法。

S O Price, M A Newnham
{"title":"医师对家庭诊所中临床药学遭遇的看法。","authors":"S O Price,&nbsp;M A Newnham","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to classify pharmacist-physician encounters in a family medicine center into three progressive levels of service in order to determine the physician's perception of the relative value of each level. The three levels of service were drug information, pharmacy consultation individualized to the patient, and pharmaceutical care-consultation with follow-up to monitor patient outcome. Physicians received a questionnaire with each encounter and were asked to rank questions regarding the quality of the information provided, the impact they perceived that the information had on patient care, and to assign a monetary value for each encounter. A total of 106 of 141 (75 percent) questionnaires suitable for analysis were stratified into drug information (25.5 percent), pharmacy consultation (49 percent), and pharmaceutical care (25.5 percent). Physicians' perceptions toward the quality, impact, and value of pharmacy services were favorable overall, but they perceived a significantly higher quality, impact, and value to pharmaceutical care encounters than for drug information and pharmacy consultation (p < 0.05).</p>","PeriodicalId":79758,"journal":{"name":"Topics in hospital pharmacy management","volume":"14 3","pages":"13-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician perceptions of clinical pharmacy encounters in a family practice clinic.\",\"authors\":\"S O Price,&nbsp;M A Newnham\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to classify pharmacist-physician encounters in a family medicine center into three progressive levels of service in order to determine the physician's perception of the relative value of each level. The three levels of service were drug information, pharmacy consultation individualized to the patient, and pharmaceutical care-consultation with follow-up to monitor patient outcome. Physicians received a questionnaire with each encounter and were asked to rank questions regarding the quality of the information provided, the impact they perceived that the information had on patient care, and to assign a monetary value for each encounter. A total of 106 of 141 (75 percent) questionnaires suitable for analysis were stratified into drug information (25.5 percent), pharmacy consultation (49 percent), and pharmaceutical care (25.5 percent). Physicians' perceptions toward the quality, impact, and value of pharmacy services were favorable overall, but they perceived a significantly higher quality, impact, and value to pharmaceutical care encounters than for drug information and pharmacy consultation (p < 0.05).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in hospital pharmacy management\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"13-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in hospital pharmacy management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in hospital pharmacy management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是将医师与药剂师在家庭医学中心的会面,分为三个渐进的服务水平,以确定医师对每个水平的相对价值的感知。三个层面的服务分别是药品信息、个体化药学咨询和药学护理咨询,并随访监测患者预后。医生在每次会面时都会收到一份问卷,并被要求对所提供信息的质量、他们认为这些信息对患者护理的影响等问题进行排名,并为每次会面分配一个货币价值。141份适合分析的问卷中,106份(75%)分为药品信息(25.5%)、药学咨询(49%)和药学服务(25.5%)。医生对药学服务的质量、影响和价值的感知总体上是有利的,但他们认为药学服务的质量、影响和价值显著高于药物信息和药学咨询(p < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physician perceptions of clinical pharmacy encounters in a family practice clinic.

The purpose of this study was to classify pharmacist-physician encounters in a family medicine center into three progressive levels of service in order to determine the physician's perception of the relative value of each level. The three levels of service were drug information, pharmacy consultation individualized to the patient, and pharmaceutical care-consultation with follow-up to monitor patient outcome. Physicians received a questionnaire with each encounter and were asked to rank questions regarding the quality of the information provided, the impact they perceived that the information had on patient care, and to assign a monetary value for each encounter. A total of 106 of 141 (75 percent) questionnaires suitable for analysis were stratified into drug information (25.5 percent), pharmacy consultation (49 percent), and pharmaceutical care (25.5 percent). Physicians' perceptions toward the quality, impact, and value of pharmacy services were favorable overall, but they perceived a significantly higher quality, impact, and value to pharmaceutical care encounters than for drug information and pharmacy consultation (p < 0.05).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opportunities for pharmaceutical care with critical pathways. The transition to medication system performance indicators. Development of a continuous quality improvement/total quality management program for medication use monitoring. Communication strategies to improve drug use evaluation. Use of critical pathways and indicators in pharmacy practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1