患者作为付款人-提供者合同的第三方受益人提起的诉讼。

Health care law newsletter Pub Date : 1995-09-01
P Aronson, M Lee
{"title":"患者作为付款人-提供者合同的第三方受益人提起的诉讼。","authors":"P Aronson,&nbsp;M Lee","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"No third party beneficiaries\" clauses, if drafted with care, can offer some measure of protection to providers. Although courts may give minimal weight to \"boilerplate\" clauses in determining contractual intent, a more detailed and substantive clause may be more persuasive. In drafting such clauses, however, care should be taken to clearly state the specific intentions of the parties, including the scope and purposes of the contract, the identity of the intended beneficiaries, and the classes of persons that are to be excluded as beneficiaries (e.g., HMO enrollees).</p>","PeriodicalId":79604,"journal":{"name":"Health care law newsletter","volume":"10 9","pages":"4-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Litigation by patients as third party beneficiaries of payor-provider contracts.\",\"authors\":\"P Aronson,&nbsp;M Lee\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>\\\"No third party beneficiaries\\\" clauses, if drafted with care, can offer some measure of protection to providers. Although courts may give minimal weight to \\\"boilerplate\\\" clauses in determining contractual intent, a more detailed and substantive clause may be more persuasive. In drafting such clauses, however, care should be taken to clearly state the specific intentions of the parties, including the scope and purposes of the contract, the identity of the intended beneficiaries, and the classes of persons that are to be excluded as beneficiaries (e.g., HMO enrollees).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health care law newsletter\",\"volume\":\"10 9\",\"pages\":\"4-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health care law newsletter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health care law newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“无第三方受益人”条款,如果精心起草,可以为提供者提供一定程度的保护。虽然法院在确定合同意图时可能对“样板”条款给予最低限度的重视,但更详细和实质性的条款可能更有说服力。然而,在起草这类条款时,应注意清楚地说明当事人的具体意图,包括合同的范围和目的、预期受益人的身份,以及将被排除在受益人之外的人员类别(例如,卫生组织的参保人员)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Litigation by patients as third party beneficiaries of payor-provider contracts.

"No third party beneficiaries" clauses, if drafted with care, can offer some measure of protection to providers. Although courts may give minimal weight to "boilerplate" clauses in determining contractual intent, a more detailed and substantive clause may be more persuasive. In drafting such clauses, however, care should be taken to clearly state the specific intentions of the parties, including the scope and purposes of the contract, the identity of the intended beneficiaries, and the classes of persons that are to be excluded as beneficiaries (e.g., HMO enrollees).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
State legislative approaches to regulating the use of genetic information. State Medicaid reform under Section 1115 demonstration authority. Arnett v. Dal Cielo: peer review confidentiality threatened by medical board investigational subpoenas. Commissioner v. Schleier: back to the drawing board on the taxation of employment dispute recoveries. Managed care liability and the capitated provider.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1