通过临床指标处理不良事件

R Portelli BAppSc (MRA), Grad Cert (Qual Imp in Health Care), B Collopy AM, MBBS, FRCS, FRACS, FRACMA, P Desmond MBBS, FRACP
{"title":"通过临床指标处理不良事件","authors":"R Portelli BAppSc (MRA), Grad Cert (Qual Imp in Health Care),&nbsp;B Collopy AM, MBBS, FRCS, FRACS, FRACMA,&nbsp;P Desmond MBBS, FRACP","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00294.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Abstract</b> In an attempt to improve the reporting rate of adverse drug reactions the Adverse Drug Reaction Advisory Committee approached the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards Care Evaluation Program to develop a set of indicators to improve healthcare standards by heightening awareness amongst clinical staff of the morbidity, mortality and financial implications of adverse drug reactions. Ten clinical indicators addressing: (i) reporting of adverse drug reactions; (ii) adherence to treatment protocols for anaphylaxis; (iii) monitoring of warfarin; and (iv) monitoring of streptokinase, were field tested in ten Australian health-care organizations, to determine that the data were available, that the indicators were relevant to clinical practice and that the measures were achievable. Based on the results of this field test, six adverse drug reaction clinical indicators will be introduced into the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards Evaluation and Quality Improvement Program from January 1999.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"19 2","pages":"79-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00294.x","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing adverse events through clinical indicators\",\"authors\":\"R Portelli BAppSc (MRA), Grad Cert (Qual Imp in Health Care),&nbsp;B Collopy AM, MBBS, FRCS, FRACS, FRACMA,&nbsp;P Desmond MBBS, FRACP\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00294.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <b>Abstract</b> In an attempt to improve the reporting rate of adverse drug reactions the Adverse Drug Reaction Advisory Committee approached the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards Care Evaluation Program to develop a set of indicators to improve healthcare standards by heightening awareness amongst clinical staff of the morbidity, mortality and financial implications of adverse drug reactions. Ten clinical indicators addressing: (i) reporting of adverse drug reactions; (ii) adherence to treatment protocols for anaphylaxis; (iii) monitoring of warfarin; and (iv) monitoring of streptokinase, were field tested in ten Australian health-care organizations, to determine that the data were available, that the indicators were relevant to clinical practice and that the measures were achievable. Based on the results of this field test, six adverse drug reaction clinical indicators will be introduced into the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards Evaluation and Quality Improvement Program from January 1999.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of quality in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"79-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00294.x\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of quality in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00294.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00294.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

为了提高药物不良反应的报告率,药物不良反应咨询委员会与澳大利亚医疗保健标准护理评估计划委员会合作,制定了一套指标,通过提高临床工作人员对药物不良反应的发病率、死亡率和财务影响的认识来提高医疗保健标准。十个临床指标涉及:(i)报告药物不良反应;(ii)遵守过敏反应治疗方案;(iii)华法林监测;(四)链激酶监测,在十个澳大利亚保健组织进行了实地测试,以确定数据可用,指标与临床实践相关,措施是可以实现的。根据这一实地试验的结果,从1999年1月起,澳大利亚保健标准评估和质量改进方案理事会将引入6项药物不良反应临床指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Addressing adverse events through clinical indicators

Abstract In an attempt to improve the reporting rate of adverse drug reactions the Adverse Drug Reaction Advisory Committee approached the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards Care Evaluation Program to develop a set of indicators to improve healthcare standards by heightening awareness amongst clinical staff of the morbidity, mortality and financial implications of adverse drug reactions. Ten clinical indicators addressing: (i) reporting of adverse drug reactions; (ii) adherence to treatment protocols for anaphylaxis; (iii) monitoring of warfarin; and (iv) monitoring of streptokinase, were field tested in ten Australian health-care organizations, to determine that the data were available, that the indicators were relevant to clinical practice and that the measures were achievable. Based on the results of this field test, six adverse drug reaction clinical indicators will be introduced into the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards Evaluation and Quality Improvement Program from January 1999.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health technology assessment. Notices Letters to the Editor Notices Author index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1