{"title":"金属正畸托槽临床使用后的变形及两种方法的脱粘。","authors":"A Coley-Smith, W P Rock","doi":"10.1093/ortho/26.2.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this paper was to compare distortion of the tie wings and bases of metallic orthodontic brackets following clinical use and after debond by either of two methods, and took the form of a prospective random control trial. Five-hundred-and-seven brackets were debonded using either bracket removing pliers or a lift off debonding instrument (LODI). By a system of random allocation contralateral opposing quadrants were debonded with a 0.019 x 0.025-inch archwire either in place or removed. After debond brackets were tested for slot closure by the fit of rectangular test wires from 0.016 x 0.022 to 0.021 x 0.025 inch in size. The LODI produced few slot closures sufficient to affect the fit of all but the largest test wire. Bracket removing pliers used after removal of the archwire produced significantly greater numbers of distorted brackets in response to testing with all but the largest wire. With the 0.021 x 0.025 inch wire in place the presence or absence of the archwire at the time of debond made no difference to the number of slot closures. Ten per cent of the brackets debonded using bracket removing pliers had distorted bases, no base damage was produced by the LODI. The use of bracket removing pliers at debond caused significantly more slot closures than use of the LODI. When bracket removing pliers are used the archwire should be left in place at the time of debond since this reduces the number of distortions.</p>","PeriodicalId":75621,"journal":{"name":"British journal of orthodontics","volume":"26 2","pages":"135-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ortho/26.2.135","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distortion of metallic orthodontic brackets after clinical use and debond by two methods.\",\"authors\":\"A Coley-Smith, W P Rock\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ortho/26.2.135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this paper was to compare distortion of the tie wings and bases of metallic orthodontic brackets following clinical use and after debond by either of two methods, and took the form of a prospective random control trial. Five-hundred-and-seven brackets were debonded using either bracket removing pliers or a lift off debonding instrument (LODI). By a system of random allocation contralateral opposing quadrants were debonded with a 0.019 x 0.025-inch archwire either in place or removed. After debond brackets were tested for slot closure by the fit of rectangular test wires from 0.016 x 0.022 to 0.021 x 0.025 inch in size. The LODI produced few slot closures sufficient to affect the fit of all but the largest test wire. Bracket removing pliers used after removal of the archwire produced significantly greater numbers of distorted brackets in response to testing with all but the largest wire. With the 0.021 x 0.025 inch wire in place the presence or absence of the archwire at the time of debond made no difference to the number of slot closures. Ten per cent of the brackets debonded using bracket removing pliers had distorted bases, no base damage was produced by the LODI. The use of bracket removing pliers at debond caused significantly more slot closures than use of the LODI. When bracket removing pliers are used the archwire should be left in place at the time of debond since this reduces the number of distortions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"135-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ortho/26.2.135\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/26.2.135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/26.2.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
本文采用前瞻性随机对照试验的形式,比较金属正畸托槽在临床使用后和脱粘后的系翼和基架变形情况。使用支架拆卸钳或升降脱粘仪(LODI)对557个支架进行脱粘。通过随机分配系统,对侧相对象限用0.019 x 0.025英寸的弓线拆除或拆除。剥离后的支架通过尺寸为0.016 x 0.022至0.021 x 0.025英寸的矩形测试线进行槽闭合测试。除了最大的测试线外,LODI几乎没有产生足以影响所有测试线配合的槽闭合。除去弓丝后使用的支架拆卸钳在除最大的弓丝外的所有测试中产生了明显更多的扭曲支架。随着0.021 x 0.025英寸导线到位,在剥离时是否存在拱形导线对插槽关闭的数量没有影响。10%的支架使用托架拆卸钳剥离有扭曲的基础,没有基础损坏产生的LODI。与使用LODI相比,在脱粘处使用托架拆卸钳会导致更多的槽封闭。当支架拆除钳使用时,弓丝应该留在原地,因为这减少了扭曲的数量。
Distortion of metallic orthodontic brackets after clinical use and debond by two methods.
The objective of this paper was to compare distortion of the tie wings and bases of metallic orthodontic brackets following clinical use and after debond by either of two methods, and took the form of a prospective random control trial. Five-hundred-and-seven brackets were debonded using either bracket removing pliers or a lift off debonding instrument (LODI). By a system of random allocation contralateral opposing quadrants were debonded with a 0.019 x 0.025-inch archwire either in place or removed. After debond brackets were tested for slot closure by the fit of rectangular test wires from 0.016 x 0.022 to 0.021 x 0.025 inch in size. The LODI produced few slot closures sufficient to affect the fit of all but the largest test wire. Bracket removing pliers used after removal of the archwire produced significantly greater numbers of distorted brackets in response to testing with all but the largest wire. With the 0.021 x 0.025 inch wire in place the presence or absence of the archwire at the time of debond made no difference to the number of slot closures. Ten per cent of the brackets debonded using bracket removing pliers had distorted bases, no base damage was produced by the LODI. The use of bracket removing pliers at debond caused significantly more slot closures than use of the LODI. When bracket removing pliers are used the archwire should be left in place at the time of debond since this reduces the number of distortions.