{"title":"信使模型ipa在托管式护理中需要谨慎。","authors":"R Tinsley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Messenger model independent practice associations (IPAs) are a popular choice for physicians coming to together to improve payer negotiations. However, it is easy for such models to run afoul of antitrust regulations, as did a messenger model IPA in Tampa, Fla. The following is a discussion of this case. You should be able to use it as a guide if and when you are ever involved in a messenger model IPA situation. This article also will provide tips and strategies for working in the messenger model IPA format.</p>","PeriodicalId":79686,"journal":{"name":"Medical group management journal","volume":"46 5","pages":"26-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Messenger model IPAs need caution in managed care.\",\"authors\":\"R Tinsley\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Messenger model independent practice associations (IPAs) are a popular choice for physicians coming to together to improve payer negotiations. However, it is easy for such models to run afoul of antitrust regulations, as did a messenger model IPA in Tampa, Fla. The following is a discussion of this case. You should be able to use it as a guide if and when you are ever involved in a messenger model IPA situation. This article also will provide tips and strategies for working in the messenger model IPA format.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical group management journal\",\"volume\":\"46 5\",\"pages\":\"26-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical group management journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical group management journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Messenger model IPAs need caution in managed care.
Messenger model independent practice associations (IPAs) are a popular choice for physicians coming to together to improve payer negotiations. However, it is easy for such models to run afoul of antitrust regulations, as did a messenger model IPA in Tampa, Fla. The following is a discussion of this case. You should be able to use it as a guide if and when you are ever involved in a messenger model IPA situation. This article also will provide tips and strategies for working in the messenger model IPA format.