水胶体敷料对毛髓窦切除后二次愈合的影响。

V Viciano, J E Castera, J Medrano, J Aguiló, J Torro, M G Botella, N Toldrá
{"title":"水胶体敷料对毛髓窦切除后二次愈合的影响。","authors":"V Viciano,&nbsp;J E Castera,&nbsp;J Medrano,&nbsp;J Aguiló,&nbsp;J Torro,&nbsp;M G Botella,&nbsp;N Toldrá","doi":"10.1080/110241500750009339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of hydrocolloid dressings in wound management after excision of pilonidal sinus.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>District hospital, Spain.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>38 patients with chronic pilonidal sinus.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Open excision with healing by second intention. Divided into three groups: conventional gauze dressing (control, n = 15), Comfeel (n = 12) and Varihesive (n = 11).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Median healing time, infection rate, intolerance, pain, comfort, ease of management, leakage, and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median healing time was 68 days (range 33-168) in the control group, compared with 65 days (range 40-137) in the two hydrocolloid groups combined. There were no differences between the hydrocolloid groups. There were no recurrences during the 74 months of follow-up. A third of the postoperative cultures in the control group grew pathogens compared with 1/23 of the patients treated with hydrocolloid dressings (p = 0.03). This was of no clinical relevance. 14/23 in the hydrocolloid group developed leaks. Pain was significantly less in the first four postoperative weeks among the patients in the hydrocolloid group than in the control group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hydrocolloid dressings lessen pain and increase comfort for patients after excision of pilonidal sinus, though time to healing is no shorten than when a conventional gauze dressing is used.</p>","PeriodicalId":22411,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/110241500750009339","citationCount":"63","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of hydrocolloid dressings on healing by second intention after excision of pilonidal sinus.\",\"authors\":\"V Viciano,&nbsp;J E Castera,&nbsp;J Medrano,&nbsp;J Aguiló,&nbsp;J Torro,&nbsp;M G Botella,&nbsp;N Toldrá\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/110241500750009339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of hydrocolloid dressings in wound management after excision of pilonidal sinus.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomised trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>District hospital, Spain.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>38 patients with chronic pilonidal sinus.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Open excision with healing by second intention. Divided into three groups: conventional gauze dressing (control, n = 15), Comfeel (n = 12) and Varihesive (n = 11).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Median healing time, infection rate, intolerance, pain, comfort, ease of management, leakage, and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median healing time was 68 days (range 33-168) in the control group, compared with 65 days (range 40-137) in the two hydrocolloid groups combined. There were no differences between the hydrocolloid groups. There were no recurrences during the 74 months of follow-up. A third of the postoperative cultures in the control group grew pathogens compared with 1/23 of the patients treated with hydrocolloid dressings (p = 0.03). This was of no clinical relevance. 14/23 in the hydrocolloid group developed leaks. Pain was significantly less in the first four postoperative weeks among the patients in the hydrocolloid group than in the control group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hydrocolloid dressings lessen pain and increase comfort for patients after excision of pilonidal sinus, though time to healing is no shorten than when a conventional gauze dressing is used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/110241500750009339\",\"citationCount\":\"63\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/110241500750009339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/110241500750009339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

摘要

目的:评价水胶体敷料在毛髓窦切除术后创面处理中的应用效果。设计:前瞻性随机试验。地点:西班牙地区医院。患者:慢性毛髓窦38例。干预措施:第二次意向愈合的开放切除。分为常规纱布敷料组(对照组,n = 15)、Comfeel组(n = 12)和Varihesive组(n = 11)。主要观察指标:中位愈合时间、感染率、不耐受、疼痛、舒适、管理难易程度、渗漏和复发。结果:对照组的中位愈合时间为68天(范围33-168),两水胶体组的联合愈合时间为65天(范围40-137)。水胶体组间无差异。在74个月的随访中无复发。对照组三分之一的术后培养物出现致病菌,而使用水胶体敷料的患者只有1/23出现致病菌(p = 0.03)。这与临床无关。水胶体组14/23发生渗漏。水胶体组术后4周疼痛明显减轻,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:水胶体敷料可减轻毛毛窦切除术后患者的疼痛,增加患者的舒适度,但其愈合时间并不比常规纱布敷料缩短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of hydrocolloid dressings on healing by second intention after excision of pilonidal sinus.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of hydrocolloid dressings in wound management after excision of pilonidal sinus.

Design: Prospective randomised trial.

Setting: District hospital, Spain.

Patients: 38 patients with chronic pilonidal sinus.

Interventions: Open excision with healing by second intention. Divided into three groups: conventional gauze dressing (control, n = 15), Comfeel (n = 12) and Varihesive (n = 11).

Main outcome measures: Median healing time, infection rate, intolerance, pain, comfort, ease of management, leakage, and recurrence.

Results: Median healing time was 68 days (range 33-168) in the control group, compared with 65 days (range 40-137) in the two hydrocolloid groups combined. There were no differences between the hydrocolloid groups. There were no recurrences during the 74 months of follow-up. A third of the postoperative cultures in the control group grew pathogens compared with 1/23 of the patients treated with hydrocolloid dressings (p = 0.03). This was of no clinical relevance. 14/23 in the hydrocolloid group developed leaks. Pain was significantly less in the first four postoperative weeks among the patients in the hydrocolloid group than in the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Hydrocolloid dressings lessen pain and increase comfort for patients after excision of pilonidal sinus, though time to healing is no shorten than when a conventional gauze dressing is used.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of surgeon's volume on early outcome after total gastrectomy. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic and open 360 degree fundoplication in mild and severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Factors that affect the variability in heart rate during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Risk factors for severe postoperative hypocalcaemia after operations for primary hyperparathyroidism. Effects of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor tyrphostin AG 556 on acute necrotising pancreatitis in rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1