{"title":"[口腔材料在细胞培养物上的细胞毒性试验]。","authors":"J Kolárová, M Hroch, M Cervinka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Authors compare the benefits and drawbacks of agar diffusion tests (with neutral red and with thiazolyl blue) and the filter diffusion test recommended as the standards for cytotoxicity testing of dental materials and their eluates. It seems that there are no differences between these diffusion tests after the treatment for 24 hours. Authors discuss the observed differences in the toxicity between a solid form of the material (ANA 2000 DUO, Evicrol Solar LC) and its eluate.</p>","PeriodicalId":79548,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica (Hradec Kralove). Supplementum","volume":"42 2","pages":"51-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Cytotoxicity tests of stomatologic materials on cell cultures].\",\"authors\":\"J Kolárová, M Hroch, M Cervinka\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Authors compare the benefits and drawbacks of agar diffusion tests (with neutral red and with thiazolyl blue) and the filter diffusion test recommended as the standards for cytotoxicity testing of dental materials and their eluates. It seems that there are no differences between these diffusion tests after the treatment for 24 hours. Authors discuss the observed differences in the toxicity between a solid form of the material (ANA 2000 DUO, Evicrol Solar LC) and its eluate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta medica (Hradec Kralove). Supplementum\",\"volume\":\"42 2\",\"pages\":\"51-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta medica (Hradec Kralove). Supplementum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica (Hradec Kralove). Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
作者比较了琼脂扩散试验(中性红和噻唑蓝)和推荐作为牙科材料及其洗脱液细胞毒性试验标准的过滤器扩散试验的优缺点。处理24小时后,这些扩散试验似乎没有差异。作者讨论了固体形式的材料(ANA 2000 DUO, Evicrol Solar LC)及其洗脱液之间观察到的毒性差异。
[Cytotoxicity tests of stomatologic materials on cell cultures].
Authors compare the benefits and drawbacks of agar diffusion tests (with neutral red and with thiazolyl blue) and the filter diffusion test recommended as the standards for cytotoxicity testing of dental materials and their eluates. It seems that there are no differences between these diffusion tests after the treatment for 24 hours. Authors discuss the observed differences in the toxicity between a solid form of the material (ANA 2000 DUO, Evicrol Solar LC) and its eluate.