风险调整比较审计。负鼠是否适用于头颈部手术?

H Griffiths, P Cuddihy, S Davis, S Parikh, A Tomkinson
{"title":"风险调整比较审计。负鼠是否适用于头颈部手术?","authors":"H Griffiths,&nbsp;P Cuddihy,&nbsp;S Davis,&nbsp;S Parikh,&nbsp;A Tomkinson","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00626.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Possum (the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality) is used in many surgical specialities for comparative audit. We investigated its validity in relation to head and neck surgery by retrospectively scoring 301 operative interventions. We also applied the P-Possum (Portsmouth Possum) equation for mortality. We compared our observed with the predicted outcomes. We introduced two new variables, radiotherapy and previous surgery to the operative site, to test their association with outcome. We found that Possum is valid for morbidity but predicts more accurately for high-risk than for low-risk groups. Neither Possum or P-Possum accurately predicts mortality. Radiotherapy and previous surgery were both significant for the development of postoperative complications (P = 0.002, P = 0.007 respectively) and are worthy of inclusion in a Possum score for head and neck surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10694,"journal":{"name":"Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences","volume":"27 6","pages":"517-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00626.x","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk-adjusted comparative audit. Is Possum applicable to head and neck surgery?\",\"authors\":\"H Griffiths,&nbsp;P Cuddihy,&nbsp;S Davis,&nbsp;S Parikh,&nbsp;A Tomkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00626.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Possum (the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality) is used in many surgical specialities for comparative audit. We investigated its validity in relation to head and neck surgery by retrospectively scoring 301 operative interventions. We also applied the P-Possum (Portsmouth Possum) equation for mortality. We compared our observed with the predicted outcomes. We introduced two new variables, radiotherapy and previous surgery to the operative site, to test their association with outcome. We found that Possum is valid for morbidity but predicts more accurately for high-risk than for low-risk groups. Neither Possum or P-Possum accurately predicts mortality. Radiotherapy and previous surgery were both significant for the development of postoperative complications (P = 0.002, P = 0.007 respectively) and are worthy of inclusion in a Possum score for head and neck surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"517-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00626.x\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00626.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00626.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

负鼠(生理和手术严重程度评分的死亡率枚举)被用于许多外科专业的比较审计。我们通过对301例手术干预进行回顾性评分来调查其与头颈部手术的有效性。我们还应用了P-Possum(朴茨茅斯负鼠)死亡率方程。我们将观察到的结果与预测的结果进行了比较。我们引入了两个新的变量,放疗和手术部位的既往手术,来测试它们与预后的关系。我们发现负鼠对发病率是有效的,但对高风险人群的预测比低风险人群更准确。Possum和P-Possum都不能准确预测死亡率。放疗和既往手术对术后并发症的发生均有显著影响(P = 0.002, P = 0.007),值得纳入头颈部手术Possum评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk-adjusted comparative audit. Is Possum applicable to head and neck surgery?

Possum (the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality) is used in many surgical specialities for comparative audit. We investigated its validity in relation to head and neck surgery by retrospectively scoring 301 operative interventions. We also applied the P-Possum (Portsmouth Possum) equation for mortality. We compared our observed with the predicted outcomes. We introduced two new variables, radiotherapy and previous surgery to the operative site, to test their association with outcome. We found that Possum is valid for morbidity but predicts more accurately for high-risk than for low-risk groups. Neither Possum or P-Possum accurately predicts mortality. Radiotherapy and previous surgery were both significant for the development of postoperative complications (P = 0.002, P = 0.007 respectively) and are worthy of inclusion in a Possum score for head and neck surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrity in medical research and publication. The Epley manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo--a systematic review. Combating bacterial resistance in otorhinolaryngology. 11Beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1 expression in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Sudden deafness: long-term follow-up and recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1