预测急性卒中预后:QEEG与加拿大神经学量表的比较。

E Cuspineda, C Machado, E Aubert, L Galán, F Llopis, Y Avila
{"title":"预测急性卒中预后:QEEG与加拿大神经学量表的比较。","authors":"E Cuspineda,&nbsp;C Machado,&nbsp;E Aubert,&nbsp;L Galán,&nbsp;F Llopis,&nbsp;Y Avila","doi":"10.1177/155005940303400104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine and compare the predictive value of quantitative EEG (QEEG) and the Canadian Neurological Scale (CaNS), in patients with an acute cerebral stroke.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Twenty-eight patients were studied with the diagnosis of acute ischemic middle cerebral artery stroke, within the first 72 hours of clinical evolution. Thirty-seven EEGs and clinical evaluations were collected: 13 during the first 24 hours after stroke onset, 9 between 24-48 hours and 15 between 48-72 hours. The QEEG studied variables were: the Z values (maximum, minimum and the Z medians from the 5 nearest points to each one) of absolute energies (AE) from the 4 classic frequencies bands. The clinical scale showed a smaller percent of correct prognosis than QEEG variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QEEG was demonstrated to be a powerful tool to predict the degree of residual functional disabilities after an acute ischemic stroke and showed a higher prognostic value than CaNS when they are performed within the first 72 hours of brain infarct.</p>","PeriodicalId":75713,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG (electroencephalography)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/155005940303400104","citationCount":"60","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting outcome in acute stroke: a comparison between QEEG and the Canadian Neurological Scale.\",\"authors\":\"E Cuspineda,&nbsp;C Machado,&nbsp;E Aubert,&nbsp;L Galán,&nbsp;F Llopis,&nbsp;Y Avila\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/155005940303400104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine and compare the predictive value of quantitative EEG (QEEG) and the Canadian Neurological Scale (CaNS), in patients with an acute cerebral stroke.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Twenty-eight patients were studied with the diagnosis of acute ischemic middle cerebral artery stroke, within the first 72 hours of clinical evolution. Thirty-seven EEGs and clinical evaluations were collected: 13 during the first 24 hours after stroke onset, 9 between 24-48 hours and 15 between 48-72 hours. The QEEG studied variables were: the Z values (maximum, minimum and the Z medians from the 5 nearest points to each one) of absolute energies (AE) from the 4 classic frequencies bands. The clinical scale showed a smaller percent of correct prognosis than QEEG variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QEEG was demonstrated to be a powerful tool to predict the degree of residual functional disabilities after an acute ischemic stroke and showed a higher prognostic value than CaNS when they are performed within the first 72 hours of brain infarct.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical EEG (electroencephalography)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/155005940303400104\",\"citationCount\":\"60\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical EEG (electroencephalography)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/155005940303400104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG (electroencephalography)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/155005940303400104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

摘要

目的:比较定量脑电图(QEEG)与加拿大神经学量表(can)对急性脑卒中患者的预测价值。方法:28例诊断为急性缺血性大脑中动脉卒中的患者,在临床发展的前72小时内进行研究。收集了37例脑电图和临床评估:13例发生在中风发作后的前24小时,9例发生在24-48小时,15例发生在48-72小时。QEEG研究的变量为:4个经典频段的绝对能量(AE)的Z值(最大值、最小值和离每个点最近的5个点的Z中值)。临床量表显示正确预后的百分比小于QEEG变量。结论:QEEG被证明是预测急性缺血性卒中后残余功能障碍程度的有力工具,并且在脑梗死后72小时内进行QEEG比can具有更高的预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting outcome in acute stroke: a comparison between QEEG and the Canadian Neurological Scale.

Objective: To determine and compare the predictive value of quantitative EEG (QEEG) and the Canadian Neurological Scale (CaNS), in patients with an acute cerebral stroke.

Methodology: Twenty-eight patients were studied with the diagnosis of acute ischemic middle cerebral artery stroke, within the first 72 hours of clinical evolution. Thirty-seven EEGs and clinical evaluations were collected: 13 during the first 24 hours after stroke onset, 9 between 24-48 hours and 15 between 48-72 hours. The QEEG studied variables were: the Z values (maximum, minimum and the Z medians from the 5 nearest points to each one) of absolute energies (AE) from the 4 classic frequencies bands. The clinical scale showed a smaller percent of correct prognosis than QEEG variables.

Conclusions: QEEG was demonstrated to be a powerful tool to predict the degree of residual functional disabilities after an acute ischemic stroke and showed a higher prognostic value than CaNS when they are performed within the first 72 hours of brain infarct.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Brain Death Effects on EEG of Drugs and Toxic Substances Disorders of Consciousness Neuromonitoring and Emergency EEG EEG Signal Acquisition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1