手术容积对全胃切除术早期预后的影响。

Tetsujl Fujita, Yoji Yamazaki
{"title":"手术容积对全胃切除术早期预后的影响。","authors":"Tetsujl Fujita,&nbsp;Yoji Yamazaki","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine correlation between number of total gastrectomies done by each of 21 surgeons and the early outcome of these operations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospital, Japan.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>136 patients treated by total gastrectomy for gastric cancer during a 4-year period.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Univariate and multivariate analyses of the effect of each surgeon's volume on the early outcome of total gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Differences in the morbidity and mortality after total gastrectomy between high-volume and low-volume surgeons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in the incidence of major complications of total gastrectomy between high-volume (7/66, 11%) and low-volume (17/70, 24%) surgeons (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Possible reasons for differences in outcome between high-volume and low-volume surgeons should be investigated in an attempt to define and describe the methods that are associated with the best outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":22411,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","volume":"168 10","pages":"535-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of surgeon's volume on early outcome after total gastrectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Tetsujl Fujita,&nbsp;Yoji Yamazaki\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine correlation between number of total gastrectomies done by each of 21 surgeons and the early outcome of these operations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University hospital, Japan.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>136 patients treated by total gastrectomy for gastric cancer during a 4-year period.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Univariate and multivariate analyses of the effect of each surgeon's volume on the early outcome of total gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Differences in the morbidity and mortality after total gastrectomy between high-volume and low-volume surgeons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in the incidence of major complications of total gastrectomy between high-volume (7/66, 11%) and low-volume (17/70, 24%) surgeons (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Possible reasons for differences in outcome between high-volume and low-volume surgeons should be investigated in an attempt to define and describe the methods that are associated with the best outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica\",\"volume\":\"168 10\",\"pages\":\"535-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨21位外科医生的全胃切除术次数与手术早期预后的关系。设计:回顾性病例系列。地点:日本大学医院。患者:4年间136例胃癌患者行全胃切除术。干预:单因素和多因素分析每位外科医生的体积对全胃切除术早期结果的影响。主要观察指标:大容量和小容量全胃切除术后发病率和死亡率的差异。结果:全胃切除术大容积(7/66,11%)与小容积(17/70,24%)术者主要并发症发生率差异有统计学意义(p = 0.04)。结论:应该调查大容量和小容量手术结果差异的可能原因,试图定义和描述与最佳结果相关的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of surgeon's volume on early outcome after total gastrectomy.

Objective: To examine correlation between number of total gastrectomies done by each of 21 surgeons and the early outcome of these operations.

Design: Retrospective case series.

Setting: University hospital, Japan.

Patients: 136 patients treated by total gastrectomy for gastric cancer during a 4-year period.

Intervention: Univariate and multivariate analyses of the effect of each surgeon's volume on the early outcome of total gastrectomy.

Main outcome measures: Differences in the morbidity and mortality after total gastrectomy between high-volume and low-volume surgeons.

Results: There was a significant difference in the incidence of major complications of total gastrectomy between high-volume (7/66, 11%) and low-volume (17/70, 24%) surgeons (p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Possible reasons for differences in outcome between high-volume and low-volume surgeons should be investigated in an attempt to define and describe the methods that are associated with the best outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of surgeon's volume on early outcome after total gastrectomy. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic and open 360 degree fundoplication in mild and severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Factors that affect the variability in heart rate during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Risk factors for severe postoperative hypocalcaemia after operations for primary hyperparathyroidism. Effects of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor tyrphostin AG 556 on acute necrotising pancreatitis in rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1