重新审视公平回合的论点。

New Zealand bioethics journal Pub Date : 2002-06-01

William Dunlop

{"title":"重新审视公平回合的论点。","authors":"William Dunlop","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Debate regarding the 'fair inning argument' has not always focused on that argument's most plausible formulation. The aim of this paper is to make substantial progress toward stating that argument in its most plausible form. Only when this is done can we confidently assess the fair innings argument.","PeriodicalId":87199,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand bioethics journal","volume":"3 2","pages":"22-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the fair innings argument.\",\"authors\":\"William Dunlop\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Debate regarding the 'fair inning argument' has not always focused on that argument's most plausible formulation. The aim of this paper is to make substantial progress toward stating that argument in its most plausible form. Only when this is done can we confidently assess the fair innings argument.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand bioethics journal\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"22-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand bioethics journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand bioethics journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

关于“公平开局论点”的争论并不总是集中在该论点最合理的表述上。本文的目的是在以最合理的形式陈述这一论点方面取得实质性进展。只有做到这一点，我们才能自信地评估公平回合的论点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Revisiting the fair innings argument.

Debate regarding the 'fair inning argument' has not always focused on that argument's most plausible formulation. The aim of this paper is to make substantial progress toward stating that argument in its most plausible form. Only when this is done can we confidently assess the fair innings argument.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

New Zealand bioethics journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

In that case: Shane is a professional rugby player who has a contract with a Super 12 team. Response. New Zealand's ethics committees. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. Protection of health research participants in the United States: a review of two cases. Cytogeneticists' stories around the ethics and social consequences of their work: a New Zealand case study.