{"title":"(统计记录。优势和非劣效性的随机对照临床试验:关键考虑因素]。","authors":"Ettore Marubini, Paola Rebora, Giuseppe Reina","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this statistical note, the fourth in the series, is to describe and critically appraise the randomized controlled clinical trial (RCCT) GUSTO V, which combined in a single RCCT both the superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses. In this note we present the logical path that the authors have presumably followed in planning a RCCT of such a kind. The results are reported and possible critical aspects are highlighted and debated upon. Finally the cardiologist reader is stimulated to give his own opinion on this kind of approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":80290,"journal":{"name":"Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","volume":"6 6","pages":"361-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Statistical notes. Randomized controlled clinical trials of both superiority and non-inferiority: critical considerations].\",\"authors\":\"Ettore Marubini, Paola Rebora, Giuseppe Reina\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this statistical note, the fourth in the series, is to describe and critically appraise the randomized controlled clinical trial (RCCT) GUSTO V, which combined in a single RCCT both the superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses. In this note we present the logical path that the authors have presumably followed in planning a RCCT of such a kind. The results are reported and possible critical aspects are highlighted and debated upon. Finally the cardiologist reader is stimulated to give his own opinion on this kind of approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"361-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本统计笔记的目的是描述和批判性评价随机对照临床试验GUSTO V (RCCT),该试验在单个RCCT中结合了优势和非劣效假设。在本文中,我们提出了作者在规划此类RCCT时可能遵循的逻辑路径。报告了结果,并强调和讨论了可能的关键方面。最后,鼓励心脏病专家读者对这种方法提出自己的意见。
[Statistical notes. Randomized controlled clinical trials of both superiority and non-inferiority: critical considerations].
The aim of this statistical note, the fourth in the series, is to describe and critically appraise the randomized controlled clinical trial (RCCT) GUSTO V, which combined in a single RCCT both the superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses. In this note we present the logical path that the authors have presumably followed in planning a RCCT of such a kind. The results are reported and possible critical aspects are highlighted and debated upon. Finally the cardiologist reader is stimulated to give his own opinion on this kind of approach.